Samsung is being sued over the Galaxy S20 series' camera glass issues

30 April 2021
You can take part in the lawsuit if you are a US resident.

Sort by:

  • D
  • AnonD-834088
  • TqA
  • 30 Apr 2021

sq2013, 30 Apr 2021I'm the same. I buy Xiaomi, umidigi, infinix or Vivo. ... moreWell said fella, maybe ppl will realize just because it's a Top Brand phone costing £500 £800 or even a £1000 plus phone, doesn't mean that there's gonna be flawes down the line,and why are ppl so obsessed with updates,cannot get my head around that,if it's not broken than why try to fix it,👍

    • D
    • AnonD-940827
    • 8pQ
    • 30 Apr 2021

    YUKI93, 30 Apr 2021I don't ever see a phone cover that covers the camera ... moreSpigen. Best covers since 2017. Never used other brands. Camera bump, screen and phone is protected. And it absorb damage, instead of the plastic that only directly transfer the damage from a fall.

      • D
      • AnonD-940827
      • 8pQ
      • 30 Apr 2021

      JohnPieux, 30 Apr 2021I should sue you for not reading the article before posting... moreI'm not the one who aren't using covers. Used protection since Nokia 3310, even though that phone lasted better than a tank.

        • s
        • sq2013
        • 0Fx
        • 30 Apr 2021

        AnonD-834088, 30 Apr 2021YEAH, there's a problem alright,stop making a killing ... moreI'm the same. I buy Xiaomi, umidigi, infinix or Vivo. I don't think that you can set a minimum cost on phones. Some people can afford them and want them. But if you're going to charge a grand. Make sure you are giving customers the best possible product. Don't take shortcuts and don't think customers are idiots and can't see when they're being played.

          • D
          • AnonD-940827
          • 8pQ
          • 30 Apr 2021

          bett, 30 Apr 2021camera is not covered with a caseIt is, if you buy spigen.! But yes, Samsung covers doesn't protect what's important. Neither does 99% of the ones you see in ads.

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • d%$
            • 30 Apr 2021

            If Samsung was Chinese, they would be callied SPIES and banned from USA for this camera glass issue.

              • D
              • AnonD-834088
              • TqA
              • 30 Apr 2021

              sq2013, 30 Apr 2021"It's still unknown how widespread the issue is b... moreYEAH, there's a problem alright,stop making a killing on customers through these hard times,I don't buy Top Brand phones any more since 2016, CUBOT fan now 👍

                My Sister's S6 Edge camera glass also cracked for no reason 2 years ago!!

                  • s
                  • sq2013
                  • 0Fx
                  • 30 Apr 2021

                  Sonu4678, 30 Apr 2021Before you feel uplifted by hearing this news, you might wa... more"It's still unknown how widespread the issue is but the company has since acknowledged the problem and said that the users are not at fault."

                  You said that it's not a widespread issue but perhaps you should read the article. It's not known how widespread the issue is. It could be widespread and it may not be. However I am pretty sure that a lawsuit wouldn't be considered if it was a few instances as any case would be dismissed out of hand and also Samsung, as the article states, have acknowledged that there's a problem.

                    • s
                    • sq2013
                    • 0Fx
                    • 30 Apr 2021

                    Sonu4678, 30 Apr 2021Before you feel uplifted by hearing this news, you might wa... more" US law firm, however, thinks that this isn't enough and Samsung has breached several consumer-protection laws. The firm in question is Hagens Berman and claims that the Korean tech giant has misled the consumers. The glass for the camera module is low-quality and doesn't reflect the price of the devices."

                    Gsmarena could face litigation if they were just saying that. That it's a fact is a fact because it wouldn't have been published otherwise. Such a statement would be ran by their legal team. Otherwise Samsung's legal team would be coming for gsmarena. That's how this works. I'm not getting giddy. I don't know if you work for Samsung or are some sort of paid advocate but you, like me, should be outraged as a consumer, that these charlatans are taking such liberties with their customers. Have a word with yourself. This is not about being partisan and liking one brand over another. Yes, I'm a Xiaomi fan and love the value and performance for their phones. However, I'd be just as judgemental, and not in a positive way, towards Xiaomi if similar product defects were found on their flagship range. However they have not skimped on materials with regards build quality and their mi 11 ultra and mi 11 are stellar products using premium materials and they're still marginally cheaper than their counterparts or direct comparison within the Samsung range. I don't care what company you are, don't try and con customers.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • LkB
                      • 30 Apr 2021

                      i0S.- Never.- Again, 30 Apr 2021Well this is why they put Victus glass on both sides of the... moreIt is rare to see devices with gorilla glass used to cover cameras.

                        i0S.- Never.- Again, 30 Apr 2021Well this is why they put Victus glass on both sides of the... moreit all adds up

                          • s
                          • sq2013
                          • 0Fx
                          • 30 Apr 2021

                          Sonu4678, 30 Apr 2021Before you feel uplifted by hearing this news, you might wa... more" US law firm, however, thinks that this isn't enough and Samsung has breached several consumer-protection laws. The firm in question is Hagens Berman and claims that the Korean tech giant has misled the consumers. The glass for the camera module is low-quality and doesn't reflect the price of the devices."

                            • b
                            • bett
                            • fnH
                            • 30 Apr 2021

                            AnonD-940827, 30 Apr 2021Samsung should sue the people for being dumb enough to not ... morecamera is not covered with a case

                              • b
                              • bett
                              • fnH
                              • 30 Apr 2021

                              bruh

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • 0Ru
                                • 30 Apr 2021

                                sq2013, 30 Apr 2021Sorry but they've every right. These phones are over a... more100 percent agree 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

                                  Anonymous, 30 Apr 2021yeah they exist to increase chances of getting your phone d... moreDo you even hear yourself? Rofl it's your fault if you break your device.

                                    beep bop boop, 30 Apr 2021Samsung cares about their customers so much that they get s... moreWell this is why they put Victus glass on both sides of the S21 Ultra

                                      sq2013, 30 Apr 2021Sorry but they've every right. These phones are over a... moreAgreed

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • LkB
                                        • 30 Apr 2021

                                        AnonD-940827, 30 Apr 2021Samsung should sue the people for being dumb enough to not ... moreI supposed this is ironic.