Samsung announces 1.4nm chip roadmap, production capacity expansion

04 October 2022
The 2nm node is expected in 2025.

Sort by:

Anonymous, 05 Oct 2022Useless Exynos crap overheating non efficient no matter wha... moreMuch better than slowdragon, no one in UK Europe Middle East buys that garbage.
Even dev don't like it.
There's loads on ebay , no one buys that garbage, accept USA. You're 10%, no one will take you seriously.

    SonOfTesla, 05 Oct 2022Oh boi Samsung.. From exploding and bloating batteries.. fr... morein case people ran out of methane gas, they would use a samsung to cook food

      PMKLR3m, 04 Oct 2022They didn't master 5nm, but already moving to 1.4nm. ... morejust like megapixels and ram sizes🤭🤭

        SShock, 05 Oct 2022All chip fabs have yield issues in the beginning. TSMC isn&... moreI wish the others would improve because TSMC is having a really strong monopoly in the fab process with Intel, Apple, Qualcomm, AMD, Nvidia all going for TSMC fabs. If Samsung and Glofo start improving, then that'll give TSMC some good competition, and they'll lower their prices. Right now TSMC wants a price hike on their newest fabs, and that's gonna hurt the industry in the long run.

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • tDP
          • 05 Oct 2022

          AnonD-731363, 04 Oct 20223nm, 2nm 1 nm??? Whats next??? And how such a small chip ... moreN0 (N zero), N-1 (N minus 1), N-2 (N minus 2)

            • S
            • Ss
            • rJd
            • 05 Oct 2022

            They need to work on battery rather then chipset

              Eatkfc, 05 Oct 2022Samsung chips have yield problem but over the time they imp... moreAll chip fabs have yield issues in the beginning. TSMC isn't some magical all powerful foundry. And it also depends on what kind of chips you're making as it then defines the yields. If you're making GPU's for RTX 3090Ti or RTX 4090, you'll only be able to fit lets say 25 of them on a single waffer. If you're making chipsets for budget phone, you can fit 250 of them on a single waffer. If you have defects on a waffer with 25 chips, you're losing a lot of final products and thus have terrible yields. Where on waffer with 250 chips, even if you lose 25 due to defects, you still get a lot of chips out of it. If you lost all 25 for bigger chips, you did all the work for nothing as you got no chips out of the process.

              And people don't realize that for Samsung, TSMC, GlobalFoundries, Intel, SK Hynix and other smaller chip foundries heavily rely on capabilities of ASML to actually provide them with lithographic equipment precise enough to manufacture such chips. ASML is a huge European (Dutch to be precise) company that designs and manufactures machines that actually "forge" chips. Without that, TSMC and all other are pretty much nothing.

                Anonymous, 04 Oct 2022What happens when we run out of numbers? Like 0 nanomete... moreAngstrom

                  • R
                  • Rosso
                  • g8$
                  • 05 Oct 2022

                  Eatkfc, 05 Oct 20227nm is not efficient than 3 or 2 nm. The problem with samsu... moreThere is more to efficiency then size of a chip, so in reality a 7nm chip can be more efficient then 2nm or 3nm one, tho the smaller one will always have higher potential

                    • R
                    • Rosso
                    • g8$
                    • 05 Oct 2022

                    Luis Moulinie, 05 Oct 2022I never thought a 1.4 nanometers chip was posible :0 What ... moreA Google search told me atoms are 0.1-0.5 nanometres

                    Still insane tho

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • nDy
                      • 05 Oct 2022

                      Luis Moulinie, 05 Oct 2022I never thought a 1.4 nanometers chip was posible :0 What ... moreatoms are too big for this world

                        I never thought a 1.4 nanometers chip was posible :0
                        What I know is an atom is 2 nanometers

                          Anonymous, 04 Oct 2022TSMC 7nm is probably more efficient, lol7nm is not efficient than 3 or 2 nm. The problem with samsung chip is yield rate. If sammy can improve the yield rate it will be on par with TSMC number.

                            Yukvgffh, 04 Oct 2022The nm doesn't mean anything anymore. Samsung had issu... moreSamsung chips have yield problem but over the time they improve it.

                              Excellent

                                Anonymous, 04 Oct 2022What happens when we run out of numbers? Like 0 nanomete... moreNo. We go back to higher numbers again when we start with 3D Quantum Processors

                                  • D
                                  • Dan
                                  • 7Xj
                                  • 05 Oct 2022

                                  So they are preparing the power hungry ovens. Okeh.

                                    • S
                                    • SonOfTesla
                                    • y6V
                                    • 05 Oct 2022

                                    Oh boi Samsung.. From exploding and bloating batteries.. from issues with the Snapdragon 888 and 8Gen1 due to your poor 5/4nm fabrications... And now you are going to 1.4nm lol
                                    Maybe this can cook a fried chicken with its awesome thermals lol

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • d%$
                                      • 05 Oct 2022

                                      Useless Exynos crap overheating non efficient no matter what nanometer

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • tZ0
                                        • 05 Oct 2022

                                        DocShep, 04 Oct 2022This is why Samsung is betterAhahahaha. Thanks for the laughs