Sony Xperia Pro-C tipped to come with compact body and faster charging
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xp6
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024Current QHD should be called 3K, but many still say 2K. T... moreThis device's display is 1080p or FHD+ assuming that resolution will be the same as Xperia 1 VI.
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xp6
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024Let's stop this fighting for once. Please use sources ... moreOr we can use 1---p instead.
X100 Pro has 1260p, iPhone 15 Pro Max has 1290p, Find X7 Ultra has 1440p and Xperia 1 V has 1644p screen. Simple.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 70d
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024Let's stop this fighting for once. Please use sources ... moreNo, FHD or Full HD is 1920 x 1080. 2K FHD can only mean 1920 x 1080. FHD+ is an umbrella term that refers to resolutions higher than FHD. QHD or Quad HD as I said is 2560 x 1440. In the same way, QHD+ is an umbrella term that refers to resolutions higher than QHD.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pw4
- 21 May 2024
John, 21 May 2024Ridiculous. They took from us the 4k display, the 21:9 rati... moreIf you want size, you're welcome to tape a tablet to your head. Normal people want a pocketable device that can be used with one hand, as intended.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Mu8
- 21 May 2024
2K, 4K resolutions technically only imply 2000, 4000 horizontal pixels, but, for a typical consumer, it also means 1440 and 2160 vertical pixels. But that's only if the aspect ratio is typical, which, nowadays, is 16:9. That's why it's incorrect to call such a screen only 2K or only FullHD. But let's not get our heads wrapped in the smallest of things, let's enjoy this sun while we can.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Mu8
- 21 May 2024
Let's stop this fighting for once. Please use sources that are at least somewhat good, not some random AI made websites that are full of ads.
We call a resolution a *K (* is any number, most commonly 2, 4) resolution because this refers to the display's horizontal resolution. We call a resolution HD, because it has a horizontal resolution of 1280 pixels in 16:9 aspect ratio and 720 pixels in vertical resolution. However, this naming only implies the horizontal resolution of 1280 pixels, there is a big number of different horizontal resolutions because of aspect ratio differences. However, this moniker enforces the vertical resolution, which should always be 720 pixels.
Saying that 2340x1080 is a 2K display or a FullHD display is not correct in pedantic terms. We say that this is 2K or FHD because it takes less time to understand and also write it, as well as more people are going to understand what are you trying to imply.
What I am saying is, if we are being pedantic, then the most correct term for a 2340x1080 display would be 2K FHD or FHD+. 2K implies that there are around 2000 horizontal pixels and FHD implies that there are 1080 vertical pixels. FHD+ implies that there is more than the standard 1920 horizontal pixels, but the vertical resolution is 1080 pixels. End of story.
- Smithravi
- 0sU
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024Current QHD should be called 3K, but many still say 2K.
T... moreFHD 16:9 --> 1920x1080 (almost 2K on width; also known as 2K; Cinema 2K 2048 × 1080)
QHD 16:9--> 2560x1440 (2.5K on width; also known as 1440p; overall 4 times pixels on 720p)
4K UHD 16:9 --> 3840x2160 (almost 4K on width and in Cinema 4K 4096 × 2160 )
This is valid only for 16:9 aspect ratio screens. Nowadays smartphone displays have odd 20:9/19.5:9 screen sizes --> Though FHD+ and QHD+ might have the same 1080 and 1440 on height, they will have different width (reason why "+" is mentioned; no single name is agreed upon)
Now coming back to arguments here; 2K means FHD+ and it should have almost 2K pixels on width with minimum 1920p. Once the height on width increased significantly depending on aspect ratio and reaches 2.5k on width and 1440p on height, it is no more 2K. Most of these resolutions are defined by the overall number of pixels present. You can't call 4000p width and 1p height a 4K because you only have overall 4k pixels on the screen where as true 4K will have almost or over 8,294,400 pixels."
- m
- mrleft
- 64i
- 21 May 2024
Hopefully this turns out to be real. This could be perfect for my interests if it's sub-70mm wide.
- m
- mrleft
- 64i
- 21 May 2024
John, 21 May 2024Ridiculous. They took from us the 4k display, the 21:9 rati... moreThe Xperia 1 VI is bigger than the 1 V. Smaller phones can and should also exist.
- Y
- Yusuf abdullahi
- r3c
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024By the way, if the display resolution of this phone is the ... moreI love it
- ?
- Anonymous
- 70d
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024Current QHD should be called 3K, but many still say 2K. T... moreBy the way, if the display resolution of this phone is the same as that of the Xperia 1 VI, it is 2340 x 1080.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 70d
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024Current QHD should be called 3K, but many still say 2K. T... moreI guess you mean QHD+. QHD is 2560 x 1440. HD is 720p. Obviously, QHD or Quad HD is 4 times of 720p.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024I'm not taking sides here, but half the globe call the... moreCurrent QHD should be called 3K, but many still say 2K.
This device is QHD, not 1080p
- ?
- Anonymous
- 70d
- 21 May 2024
Anonymous, 21 May 2024I'm not taking sides here, but half the globe call the... moreYou can help by using correct terms.
- D
- Dolle
- mrr
- 21 May 2024
Love the small size!!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8XP
- 21 May 2024
I'm not taking sides here, but half the globe call the 1220 x 2712 (redmi), the Chinese 1.5k resolution. Somebody please come clean the mess. We're not talking the same language anymore.
- N
- Nameless
- L1m
- 21 May 2024
Seems like an action cam setup on the phone.
- J
- John
- gqL
- 21 May 2024
Ridiculous. They took from us the 4k display, the 21:9 ratio and now the size... So bad