Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra - quick camera comparison

13 April 2025
How does the new setup perform compared to the outgoing model?

Sort by:

Anonymous, 14 Apr 2025Why are the X8 pictures blurrier? the W in the first photo ... morebro's so used to bad sensors that he thinks good sensors are broken 🤣🤣🤣

    • A
    • Almik
    • AZY
    • 14 hours ago

    Anonymous, 14 Apr 2025Why are the X8 pictures blurrier? the W in the first photo ... moreBecause of shallower depth of field, it's written in the article. If you want to have deeper depth of field (all image sharp), then buy something with smaller sensor and/or slower lens aperture. But I'm sure 9 of 10 people would be more satisfied with X8 Ultra...

      Anonymous, 14 Apr 2025Why are the X8 pictures blurrier? the W in the first photo ... moreDeeper depth of field and more sharpening on Find X7 Ultra's photos in general. At least for the two telephoto cameras, the actual amount of captured details is noticeably higher on Find X8 Ultra.

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • 7@q
        • 14 Apr 2025

        Why are the X8 pictures blurrier? the W in the first photo is a good example of the X7 having more detail. Here's hoping the X200 Ultra isn't a complete downgrade like this

          Inedian, 14 Apr 2025Nokia 808 Pureview stills were impressive, still are. Those... more100%!!!

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • raQ
            • 14 Apr 2025

            Nick Tegrataker, 13 Apr 2025Not to mention GSMArena completely got rid of the studio ca... moreWhat do you think of Notebookcheck smartphone reviews?

              raditz594, 14 Apr 2025808 photos are just softer than what we get nowl. You can s... morei've seen RAW samples of the X100 Pro and use RAW from time to time on my S22 Ultra and really love it.

              BUT it just isn't the same as the 808 man, similar? sure. But it's nowhere near that phone. God I love its samples so much... And that flash!! GOOD LORD........!!!!!

                • I
                • Inedian
                • L2r
                • 14 Apr 2025

                jiyen235, 14 Apr 2025yeah i've seen RAW files of the X100 Pro and they'... moreNokia 808 Pureview stills were impressive, still are. Those who want cheap phone (160€) with impressive cam and are not bothered by today
                impressive displays and CPU, Nokia 808 is the one to get.

                I know when i had Galaxy Note 8 in 2017, in that time i didn't know about Nokia 808, i would take 808 instead of all those flagships and that was time i was using only classic SMS :)

                  jiyen235, 13 Apr 2025sony has NOT come close lol, their sensors are too tiny for... more808 photos are just softer than what we get nowl. You can still achieve this look if you want to

                    AntonelPAPI, 13 Apr 2025That's exactly why I'm going to buy a red one on ... moregonna be a great purchase!

                      Inedian, 14 Apr 2025Although when i use SuperRaw on Vivo X90PP, the photos and ... moreyeah i've seen RAW files of the X100 Pro and they're splendid. But even then, the Nokia is in a class of its own. Naturally high res sensor that's made with both 4:3 and 16:9 shooting in mind.... What sort of genius even came up with that?

                      Also, that phone has naturally high dynamic range idk what it is but it's my observation. Even tho there's no computational HDR processing the photos dont look horrendous in terms of dynamic range. Now THAT'S a classy sensor!!!!

                      Honestly the X300 Ultra could just use the same sensor and use Vivo's processing and im sure people would give it the best phone camera of 2026 award.

                        Anonymous, 13 Apr 2025If I am not wrong, samsung was given highest " zoom&qu... moreAgain, it's PhoneArena, so what do you expect lol.

                          unxpctd, 14 Apr 2025This is why I want to see Foveon sensors used. Give us some... moreUnfortunately, Foveon X3 sensors will NEVER come to smartphones because it has an utterly atrocious high ISO performance compared to conventional CMOS sensors with CFA. Exotic technology means nothing if it can't take good-looking photos to begin with.. Practicality matters.

                            • I
                            • Inedian
                            • L2r
                            • 14 Apr 2025

                            jiyen235, 13 Apr 2025sony has NOT come close lol, their sensors are too tiny for... moreAlthough when i use SuperRaw on Vivo X90PP, the photos and its organic look reminds me and are similiar with Nokia 808... excellent photos in SRAW.

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • 0p}
                              • 14 Apr 2025

                              The bokeh is significantly better on the new phone. Seems like mobile photography is approaching DSLR levels of quality.

                                Anonymous, 13 Apr 2025I'm a bit unsure about their methodology for testing s... morelisten to the samples and judge for yourself. Their samples are highly accurate.

                                My S22 Ultra and my relatives' Pixel 7, S23 U, S25 U, iPhone 11-14 Pros/Pro Maxes and stuff all sound similar to what i heard over here.

                                  Goku UI, 13 Apr 2025PhoneArena is biased just like DxOMark...at least DxO Mark has history in the progressional photography industry and has made their own RAW processor

                                    Anonymous, 13 Apr 2025Studio shots. You can see phones from 2022-24 were not ... moreThis is why I want to see Foveon sensors used. Give us something new and exciting! Try new stuff! I appreciate Fuji also for their non-conventional nature too. This is the process that drives progress.

                                    Foveon sensors have higher color information and possible higher sharpness as a result of needing less aggressive anti-aliasing filters compared to Bayer sensors. They had a real hard time in the DSRL era, so I wish they would pivot and see what else is possible.

                                    "Subsequent X3-equipped cameras have less aliasing because they include micro-lenses, which provide an anti-aliasing filter by averaging the optical signal over an area commensurate with the sample density. This is not possible in any color channel of a Bayer-type sensor. Aliasing from the Foveon X3 sensor is "far less bothersome because it's monochrome," said Norman Koren.[19] In theory, it is possible for a Foveon X3 sensor with the same number of photodiodes as a Bayer sensor and no separate anti-aliasing filter to attain a higher spatial resolution than that Bayer sensor."

                                      jiyen235, 13 Apr 2025sony has NOT come close lol, their sensors are too tiny for... moreThat's exactly why I'm going to buy a red one on eBay, box included, they're around $150.

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • 0p}
                                        • 13 Apr 2025

                                        Aierlan, 13 Apr 2025Yeah, I agree with all your points. I found that old studi... moreStudio shots.

                                        You can see phones from 2022-24 were not outperforming old phones (2018-2020). Too embarassing to keep posting.

                                        Weird parte is how this site praises most phones when photos are ultra nasty.
                                        Many reviews have unusable jpegs ( often motorola, realme and asus), still they write good things.

                                        Too bad no one is going to use bayer cfa again. QB is clearly inferior tech and was created to increase profits.

                                          1 of 3