Nokia 6220 classic
- F
- Fred
- PN2
- 25 Jun 2008
Fred, 25 Jun 2008Just want to confirm if this phone got a 2.5mm or 3.5mm jack?It comes with a 2.5mm jack (and no 2.5mm to 3.5mm adapter).
Doesn't worry me as I use bluetooth headphones.
- s
- saruga
- S0I
- 25 Jun 2008
Fred, 25 Jun 2008Just want to confirm if this phone got a 2.5mm or 3.5mm jack?2.5 mmm. Go to the nokia site and see dud.
- F
- Fred
- wuj
- 25 Jun 2008
Just want to confirm if this phone got a 2.5mm or 3.5mm jack?
- s
- saruga
- S0I
- 24 Jun 2008
Anonymous, 01 Jan 1970389 euros
- s
- s
- iFr
- 23 Jun 2008
it's already available here in kuwait ^-^
- o
- omer
- 25L
- 23 Jun 2008
Chad, 22 Jun 2008Mate i'm no fake here is a pic of my monitor screen taken b... morewe all are counting on you about the review of your 6220 classic.about everything... So wite this early.okiz take care
- a
- aatu
- nxP
- 23 Jun 2008
Anonymous, 23 Jun 2008Nokia 6220 classic, 108 x 47 x 15 mm,
5 MP, 2592х1944 pixe... more(Part 3, because this board doesn't seem to like "arrow"-symbols. Now in full text, mods/admins can delete parts 1 and 2)
Like you can see from my previous post, I don't mind paying a little premium, if the specs are right. In this case the specs are better for 6220c, even though it's cheaper (I would have liked to have (less than(!))13mm thickness, but 6220c was best there is with Xenon).
The last line in your post kind of puzzles me. You show specs and ask for opinions concerning style etc.?
The only thing relating to style on specs is physical size, in which Nokia is better, btw... (You do know the G810 is kind of a brick?)
Furthermore, G810 is more likely to be compared with Nokia N82 (in size, price, etc). Yet I chose 6220c over N82.
But regarding price vs. specs: G810 would have to be 30-40% cheaper than 6220c for me to consider it.
And about cameraphones: that's exactly what I wanted, so that I could have camera with me all the time, without it taking extra space. And 6220c is targeted to this genre.
But if you want a basic, shiny mobile, I'd say LG KF510 (!), KF750, KE970, KE850 or Samsung F480, F490 (!), Armani are best choices.
- a
- aatu
- nxP
- 23 Jun 2008
aatu, 23 Jun 2008Like you can see from my previous post, I don't mind paying... more(Part 2, I don't know why it capped this...)
... (I would have liked to have
- a
- aatu
- nxP
- 23 Jun 2008
Anonymous, 23 Jun 2008Nokia 6220 classic, 108 x 47 x 15 mm, 5 MP, 2592х1944 pixe... moreLike you can see from my previous post, I don't mind paying a little premium, if the specs are right. In this case the specs are better for 6220c, even though it's cheaper (I would have liked to have
- ?
- Anonymous
- n4W
- 23 Jun 2008
aatu, 22 Jun 2008Note: "Flash" does not equal to Xenon-flash, so most of tho... moreNokia 6220 classic, 108 x 47 x 15 mm,
5 MP, 2592х1944 pixels,
Carl Zeiss optics,
autofocus, video(VGA 30fps),
Xenon flash; secondary videocall camera
240 x 320 pixels, 2.2 inches
Standard battery, Li-Ion 900 mAh (BP-5M)
Samsung G810 103 x 52.9 x 17.9 mm
5 MP, 2560х1920 pixels,
autofocus, face detection,
video(VGA),
xenon flash,
3x optical zoom
240 x 320 pixels, 2.6 inches
Standard battery, Li-Ion 1200 mAh
That is easy to compare,there is list of specifications !
What is the price for the distinction betwen this two phones in aspect of style,look,quality, emotions ?
- ?
- Anonymous
- n4W
- 23 Jun 2008
aatu, 22 Jun 2008Note: "Flash" does not equal to Xenon-flash, so most of tho... moreOK aatu. It is your opinion and your choice about what you prefere. I respect that. But I do think that mob .phone is not even close to real digital camera, with xenon or not whatever. That is why i own real digital cameras Fuji fd100 and Pentax K200, 10-100 times better than any mobile phone. I just want stylish, fast responsive, with clear and loud talking sound, user friendli phone with excelent quality. I realy think that the choice is one. Samsung. My opinion is based on my 10 year experience with many Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, Sagem, Ericson, Sony Ericson, LG, Alcatel phones. I do want to buy some HTC like TouchPro but.....it is way to expensive for just "mobile phone" and i realy do not need so many options (i have laptop for that), except that superb VGA screen :). The same for iPhone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- n4W
- 23 Jun 2008
aatu, 22 Jun 2008Note: "Flash" does not equal to Xenon-flash, so most of tho... moreOK aatu. It is your opinion and your choice about what you prefere. I respect that. But I do think that mob .phone is not even close to real digital camera, with xenon or not whatever. That is why i own real digital cameras Fuji fd100 and Pentax K200, 10-100 times better than any mobile phone. I just want stylish, fast responsive, with clear and loud talking sound, user friendli phone with excelent quality. I realy think that the choice is one. Samsung. My opinion is based on my 10 year experience with many Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, Sagem, Ericson, Sony Ericson, LG, Alcatel phones. I do want to buy some HTC like TouchPro but.....it is way to expensive for just "mobile phone" and i realy do not need so many options (i have laptop for that), except that superb VGA screen :). The same for iPhone.
- R
- RMS
- SkE
- 23 Jun 2008
Chad, 22 Jun 2008Mate i'm no fake here is a pic of my monitor screen taken b... moreok bravo i got it.so you are the lucky one using the phone.well i m from uae and still waiting to get my hands on this preety device.dear can you tell me about the sound quality and battery..i will be very thankful to u and how is ur xperinz what u will suggest me for nokia 6220 c
- u
- user
- ceq
- 23 Jun 2008
i would like to know why nowdays all nokia model has high SAR value rate? Hopefully nokia would do something, at least below 1.0
- a
- aatu
- nxP
- 22 Jun 2008
Anonymous, 21 Jun 2008I wrote "build quality and style", but if u considering spe... moreNote: "Flash" does not equal to Xenon-flash, so most of those mentioned phones don't apply.
About build: I haven't tested that many phones, but yes, rumours state that to get 6220c low priced, they're compromising on material quality. Time will tell how it plays out.
About style: I already stated other manufacturers have some nice looking and thin alternatives, but to be honest, I don't think 6220c is ugly, either. Whatever rocks your boat, I guess.
And if you want something beautiful, I'd say LG KF510 is VERY nice, but that's pretty much all there is for that phone...
About some of the suggested phones (the rest have even more flaws):
Yes, i900 would be very nice, except it doesn't come with Xenon, AND it will cost way more. I could even forgive 100€ (max) price premium over 6220c if it had Xenon (and lens cover btw).
G810 would also be nice, except it costs more and it's thicker.
F490 is very nice (I even thought about getting this one), except no Xenon or GPS. IF it had at least Xenon (and lens cover woulnd't do harm either), I'd buy this one. (It's thin, 5Mpix, 3.3" screen and almost as cheap as 6220c.)
PS. To RMS about "fake posts": For example in Finland, some stores have stated small on-and-off stocks since mid-June...
- C
- Chad
- vCK
- 22 Jun 2008
lil_junk, 22 Jun 2008does tis phone have video ringtone(.mp4) function? Yes you can set Mp4 videos for ringtones.
@ Michael yes i got it on a contract
- M
- Michael
- R5v
- 22 Jun 2008
lil_junk, 22 Jun 2008does tis phone have video ringtone(.mp4) function? so this phone is in Australia I want to see it in the Philippines as soon as possible. So you got yours with a contract is that correct, good deal in my opinion
- l
- lil_junk
- F4p
- 22 Jun 2008
does tis phone have video ringtone(.mp4) function?
- C
- Chad
- vCK
- 22 Jun 2008
RMS, 22 Jun 2008it is clearly mentioned in Q3 but god know from where these... moreMate i'm no fake here is a pic of my monitor screen taken by my new Nokia 6220c.
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/4829/22062007008vu1.jpg
And if you are from Aust you can get it from Virgin mobile here.
www.virginmobile.com.au
Hope that is enough proof for all the doubters
- R
- RMS
- SkE
- 22 Jun 2008
it is clearly mentioned in Q3 but god know from where these ppl are getting this mobile wothout telling us properly how the device work.
I guess that all these post are fake....