Nokia 6233
- d
- dj
- Ss{
- 11 Mar 2006
I dont understand how could talking time be max 4 hours and stand-by 340 hours?!
Nokia 6280 have almost same functionality, display,battery, good speed and have bad stand-by time and talking time in real life - just see comment on it.
I dont expect this phone bee max 3-4 days stand-by if not using.
- A
- Adric
- nsG
- 11 Mar 2006
I hope its quality is much more improoved than the mediocre 6230i and a step closer to SE,Samsung and Sharp...
I had 3230 and it was the worst quality phone i ever had in my life,
too many OS problems and dust enters under the screen and make it very blur, Nokia's quarantee wont cover it.
Nokia's reabilty suffers these times...
because they are in the hunt of features
- ?
- Anonymous
- iIR
- 10 Mar 2006
i think it luks like a nice looking phone. and i luks similar to nokia 6230i which i have, i think nokia's are really reliable so i will purchase this phone.
- a
- andy
- ijC
- 09 Mar 2006
3g dosent mean only video calls could be data. peace x x
- R
- Richard
- 2IB
- 09 Mar 2006
Hi everyone, I was silent in this forum for quite sometimes, since 6230i was first posted.(name as Rich) Just a word to share, 6233 will be next hot phone for selection after 6230i. Hope this phone will not improve by not having acsending problem.
Anyway, the internal memory should be 70MB & not 6MB as posted(see Nokia website)
See u fans later....
- v
- vvaqas
- PGh
- 08 Mar 2006
it is not necessary to use 3G as two-way video call it can be use as to increase the rate for transfering bytes
- ?
- Anonymous
- PFg
- 07 Mar 2006
its a masterpiece of nokia, if u want a flash for the camera & secondary camera for video calling, the price will be up rise twice and dont u ever forget, this is a classic product of nokia, buy 6680 or any other else to get flash n secondary cameras.
- Z
- ZaZa
- Mva
- 07 Mar 2006
3G is not equal to two-way video calls!!!!!!
Do you understand???
- L
- Levi
- RKp
- 06 Mar 2006
3G???????????????? But how????? With only 1 rear camera???????? ......
- A
- Amiya
- T2$
- 04 Mar 2006
Very nice phone.It would be better if it had a flash for camera and also had a secondary camera
- B
- BEDZ
- iL%
- 04 Mar 2006
Memory card format change again, thank you Nokia for letting other companies now pass you.
- s
- sean
- Rxw
- 03 Mar 2006
nice phone, although it would of been a bonus if it included a secondary cam for video calling to enhance its 3g capabilities and a flash for the camera.
- a
- andrew
- Mvf
- 03 Mar 2006
Top selling at Nokia was 6230 and 6230i ! The little genius son of them is 6233.They expect to sell a lot too . His target is not just business or fun , is for everibody !
- A
- Aparadectos
- nsG
- 02 Mar 2006
Newbie?
son my exp on the field is older than ur self,
u dont have to insult ppl when u have no arguemetns to post, concantrate on the post not the poster...
and u r wrong again,
Nokia doesnt have, Nokia WILL have,
as always, u r the one thas has to learn the difference of announcing a phone and of actually lounch it, N92 isnt on the market,
u cant claim its superiority on TV feature as Samsung has already handsets working in korea and will probably lounch P900 sooner than N92, u r making the same mistakes again and again,
tha same mistakes u did on the superior and inovative N80 the only 3mp phone wich SE,Samsung couldnt chalenge...
when u make some mistakes u must have at least the courage to recognize them as a man,
maybe u will learn smth some day,
dont hide beside insults
- v
- viperkid
- PRQ
- 02 Mar 2006
i think it would be better if they put a secondary VGA camera for video call.. well..
Aparadectos:
stop bigging up SE and arrogantly feel proud of urself cuz there's no reason y u must by saying:
"SE,Samsung and Sharp will always be a step forward!"
SE = only QVGA screen with 256k colours
nokia = now has 352 x 416 screen res with 16 million colours plus WLAN, uPnP! nokia announced model/s with DVB-H TV already plus push to talk and EDGE are available way way back then and SE only had EDGE recently, is that what u call a STEP FORWARD! you gotta be kidding or i better say UR KIDDING! get ur facts right and stop fooling around with people bcoz apparently ur a NEWBIE in this mobile industry and perhaps better make ur homework rather than to slate brands with baseless, biased and arrogant comments, hahaha! you know that i showed u the way out in a SE forum of this website before so i think u should learn ur lessson now!
- ?
- Anonymous
- PFg
- 02 Mar 2006
ladies & gentlemen, please not to compare the product between nokia and SE, its just like comparing Mercedes and BMW, each product had their own fans, so be nice.
- A
- Aparadectos
- nsG
- 02 Mar 2006
Once again i was right
and all of you Nokia Fans were wrong,
i told you from the very beginning this is not going to compete K750,
it is a new phone with features on par with K750 but came in too late (even though was announced much earlier),
by the time Nokia will come up with a K750/D600 opponent, as the succesor of 6230i,
SE,Samsung and Sharp will always be a step forward!
Dont question me again without doing ur homework i m not a newbie at telecomunications and mobile fields...
The funny thing would be to see some Nokia fans after a while,
trying and convince others this phone is better than K800 because of this
and because of that
and some ppl from the middle east make some posts like,
"WOW this is the best phone ever made, thank u Nokia" etc etc...
- Z
- ZaZa
- iAk
- 01 Mar 2006
It will be available approximately in the middle of May. The price will be circa 325 Euros.
- Z
- ZaZa
- m%x
- 26 Feb 2006
High quality display but its pretty small.
"Only" 2" against Nokia 6280 2.2" display.
- y
- yztian_71
- ijA
- 26 Feb 2006
Nice features. High quality display. Unattractive design... SE k800 looks better & the camera, whoa! 3.2 MPx (cybershot) For sure it's exceptional! ^_^