Nokia 808 PureView
- S
- Sam
- Meh
- 01 Mar 2012
zico, 29 Feb 2012it looks like such a promising phone with all the features ... morealso the Display is quite primitive... 360x640 resolution my Nokia5800 has , even after 2 year nokia is shipping this screen is a 'thumps down'. For a 41MP at least a HD quality screen should have been provided. And definatly 512 ram looks quite insufficient for a smart phone with 41MP camera! probably will have to use and see!
- v
- vnn09
- bJh
- 01 Mar 2012
take picture with nokia 808 in pure view mode and you will see an android would never be able to do that .....and it really is a cameraphona...when you can have a phone and a tab combined why not a supercam and smartphone....and if android is that genius i would suggest to android to design a phone with 512 mb ram and 1.3ghz singlecore processor that would run 20mp camera(half of pure view 808)
- ?
- Anonymous
- pWT
- 01 Mar 2012
808 is navigator too!
- ?
- Anonymous
- DQp
- 01 Mar 2012
This is a Camera PHONE. Not a camera. Do we complain and compare Compact Cameras against cellphones that compact cameras cant do calls, play games, update firmware Over the Air? No right? because phone is not equal to camera.
This 41MP camera is just an extra. Just like a laptop thas has Epic built in speakers for gaming or pr0n. I havent heard Audiophiles complaining on a laptops advertised speakers output and bashing it to hell...
- G
- Golu
- HsL
- 01 Mar 2012
omg nokia.
- ?
- Anonymous
- DQp
- 01 Mar 2012
To fandroid who are complaining about the 41MP camera......
Who needs a phone with a projector?!?! *cough cough Galaxy beam *cough
ok fine Android have guys who are into projectors and Nokia has guys into Photography. so whats the problem now?
No thank on the projector feature, i can plug my phone to a projector,DLNA or HDTV. kthnxbb
- z
- zymesh
- DQp
- 01 Mar 2012
To those of you who think Symbian is not good, its really very capable. Try to use a Symbian Belle device first before judging the spec sheet.
Example is my Nokia N8 got infected with the "virus that makes folder invisible and puts folder .lnk". Even though my phone was infected both MMC and Phone Memory (E:/ and F:/) its still works. I removed the virus and fixed the folders and .lnk files in less than 2 minutes. Tried fixing another infected Hard Drive on both Windows 7 and OS Lion and i cant fix it. Just did the long way of copying the hiddden folders contents to a new folder.... Just showing the hidden folders in OSX and Windows takes 2 minutes or more.
- K
- Kent
- t7X
- 01 Mar 2012
I dont want galaxy note,ist too big,you nee to use ur two hands to answer calls ,or else u might drop it,u cnt even put it on ur pocket,i mean its size isnt normal,juz for me,
- D
- AnonD-18715
- Xuj
- 01 Mar 2012
maril8, 01 Mar 2012who would want a 41mp camera on their mobile phones? and fy... more1. Who needs a 41MP phone if android cannot make it....
Hahaha.... Are you joking guys, after N8, many criticized who needs 12MP camera on a phone if 8MP(by android) is enough....
2. Overall performance. That's really funny.... Even force close doesn't work on my friends droid and losing our personal data is good performance....
3. Lumia is just out now.... Wait for windows 8 and you'll see many surprise from nokia....
I don't know how the phones are going to sell, but i'm sure that nokia's first tablet is going to blast the market with its sales....
- ?
- Anonymous
- pWT
- 01 Mar 2012
is it better than my 85e olympus vg 120
if it is i'll buy 808
- J
- JUST24EVER
- vaS
- 01 Mar 2012
I really cant believe that this nokia phone won the award ,because maybe it has the 41mp camera ,well for a person like me i would say I DONT CARE about the megapixel of the camera I rather chose the SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE ,because I am really an android fan ,but im not telling this because i love android phones is just that i dont like the design and even though it has a 1.3 ghz single core processor its still not enough for a smartphone. For a photographer or a person who wants to take a picture a lot of times especially when traveling this is a great phone that they should really get ,but for me I LOVE ANDROID way better
- i
- id
- uNV
- 01 Mar 2012
360X640 r u kiddin me? Wid a camera dat gr8 nd resoultn so poor very dissapointed
- ?
- Anonymous
- 9xI
- 01 Mar 2012
What is the price?
- ?
- Anonymous
- u7L
- 01 Mar 2012
I am an all time android fan but symbian belle is really different.Its really easy,nice gui and fulfil major requirements.And the camera can beat my many digis.
- v
- viju
- uvd
- 01 Mar 2012
really nice
- S
- Sunil
- U@F
- 01 Mar 2012
Fandroids saying all the rubbish abt nokia's camera, there r lot of andriod phones with 5mp cam, with autofocus, i just wanna say, have u seen images taken frm nokia's old 5mp autofocus camera (nokia n95, or n79).....u will c d difference......talk all d rubbish u want, but symbian os is still d second best for me (first best is meego)......fandriods just go d hell out of nokia's fan comment section.....
- ?
- Anonymous
- vGQ
- 01 Mar 2012
When it's coming to india
- s
- shameToShowMyIPHONE
- bJv
- 01 Mar 2012
I am an iPhone owner, but I will feel shame to pull out my iPhone when Nokia 808 around me!
- L
- Lloyd
- 2@R
- 01 Mar 2012
I have Belle on my Nokia C7 and I must say, it's a lot better than symbian^3! It's faster, there's better Facebook and twitter and less lags. Nokia 808 should even be better with it's 1.3 GHz processor. To me, it's worth the money.
- D
- AnonD-44555
- rKa
- 01 Mar 2012
Really its 41 megapixel camera?