Nokia N90
MORE PICTURES

Nokia N90

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • S
  • Sonners
  • mTk
  • 28 Apr 2005

This phone is great, I had my heart set on the 6680 but now I've found a dream phone. Another great camera phone is the Samsung P860 with a 5 megapixel camera and a 16m colour screen, but I prefer this one due to the fact it runs on a symbian operating system.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • mXy
    • 28 Apr 2005

    Does anyone know what MMC size can itt ake like 4gb or what??

      • S
      • Si Dude
      • mXy
      • 28 Apr 2005

      Right noise ina picture is when you get those lines in a photo expecialy when it is dark. It tells you how wellt he cam is and with nosie in the picture, of course it isn't clear so the less noise in a picture the better it is! The quality of the SE K750 and this won't be much but not sure which is better yet! I am waiting to see what GSM Arena say first!

        • a
        • alzw
        • MfA
        • 28 Apr 2005

        Ya i agreed too, is rly time for us to throw our 6260 aside.

          • M
          • Monday
          • M{d
          • 28 Apr 2005

          Bravo! Nokia, I am happy that you've finally decided to take on the war footings. If Nokia 90 performs according to descriptions, will be the right thing to do as a step in the right direction. I moved from Nokia to Samsung because Nokia missed the jyves in the system. I may come back if you do well. He! Watch out for Samsung Z500. Just 'beat it'.

            • d
            • den
            • mpE
            • 28 Apr 2005

            does any1 no what people mean when they say about noise in a picture?also help on this n90 and the k750 was dead set on going 4 the k750 cause its meant to be a grt cam phone now this is going to be hitting the market any idea how much different the qulity in the pictures will be with the 2 different lens also the k750 has a high cam pixel any 1 help if cam pixels make the pictures look better?thanks

              • L
              • L-dawg
              • 4q5
              • 28 Apr 2005

              ugly!

                • W
                • Wiseguy
                • mIn
                • 28 Apr 2005

                RDb are u living in the stone age? Who uses infrared anymore its outdated, bluetooth is the technoly of today.

                  • s
                  • spooks73
                  • S35
                  • 28 Apr 2005

                  time to get ready to throw away my nokia 6260

                    • d
                    • den
                    • mpE
                    • 28 Apr 2005

                    Goku as u seen to no alot about the lens front on the phones have u any idea how the the sony e k750 cam is like and the lens i have had my heart set on that phone 4 awhile now as i like to take gd photos without having to carry round a digital cam.hope u can help thinks

                      • G
                      • Goku
                      • S7U
                      • 28 Apr 2005

                      Carl Zeiss lenses, are the best on the market. They provide the ability to sharply capture a depiction of the subject's detail.
                      - the ability to depict an image accurately, so that the straight lines of the subject become the straight lines in the photograph.
                      - the ability to block stray light, so that the subject's color can be captured faithfully and vividly. It's the best quality camera available and these lenses are in use by Sony's Cyber-Shot digital cameras.Well-done Nokia.You are a true leader.

                        • R
                        • RDb
                        • myp
                        • 28 Apr 2005

                        wtf still no infra red!! nokia bringing out some badboys now!

                          • e
                          • efilylenol
                          • TKb
                          • 28 Apr 2005

                          wow...~ An upgrade of Nokia 6260 cool phone with good camera... thumb up for nokia.. but what happen to the infrared...? haha.. maybe there is no need for infrared anymore in the future... but the screen does not rotate at 270 degrees anymore...

                          plus.. when it is open.. the camera seems to be on the bottom of the phone..thus the phone is sitting at a weird angle.. but overall.. it is one phone that really really rectify the mistake of the Nokia 6260 that I am having now.. that is good camera... ^_^ hehe.. :P

                          heavy..and big size it is though.. not so good.. anyway...but i'll just close and eye about it, cause the features and performance could overwrite the it. Just hope the phone is not pricey... ^^ Way to go...! ^_^

                            • h
                            • hayden
                            • Rxt
                            • 28 Apr 2005

                            double thumbs up nokia real good phone!!!! movie quality should be very good as well. for all those ppl interested in the new 416*352 pixel display if it has the same pixelations as the nokia 6230i that would make the screen 6 by 5 cm which is enormour making the width of the phone close to 6 or 7 cm and by looking at the actual size of the phone and screen the display would have to be even sharper than this. that quite franky is insanely good, by far the best on the market

                              • t
                              • tombo
                              • SrA
                              • 28 Apr 2005

                              A big phone yes, but still so tempting. The weight isn´t really an issue for me, at least I don´t think it will be. Can´t wait to get my hands on it. I bought the 6260 a few months ago and this would be a great update. The only things I wish the 6260 had is here. And all the important buttons are on the lower half and that´s a big plus! No more awkward reaching for the screenside...

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • Mqm
                                • 28 Apr 2005

                                such a great phone, I was impressed by the screen display, but it's a big phone, isn't it >?

                                  • t
                                  • tombo
                                  • SrA
                                  • 28 Apr 2005

                                  If someone is still wondering what the thing on the backside is, check the other pictures on this site. Can´t be that hard to search for information. Well.. it is the camera but it won´t be on the backside when you carry the phone in you´re pocket, it turns on the top of the handset.

                                  At last Nokia got a really good camera on on one of their phones. And a quality camera with real optics means bigger size and weight.. Isn´t Carl Zeiss optics used in the thinnest digital cameras, where the lens/zoom system moves inside the camera´s body lengthwise? I was just wondering if the camera has even got an optical zoom...

                                    • f
                                    • flamingsnot
                                    • M$6
                                    • 28 Apr 2005

                                    one word: wow - this is what the nokia 6260 should have been, i cant bleev i was actually gonna buy that phone! nokia would've made me a sucker, hah, patience is a virtue, this phone's mine, oi FCC, hurry up and approve it.

                                      • a
                                      • andrei rom
                                      • mAU
                                      • 28 Apr 2005

                                      i'm sorry samsung p850 is better just because it has 3mpx,it is smaller(96x47x22(26with upcam)) and lighter(115g).this is cool but too big too heavy if the camera could be removed it would be cool. love the screen though... also no stero speakers

                                        • N
                                        • Nexus
                                        • m9C
                                        • 28 Apr 2005

                                        can someone plz explain to me what the cameras from the other 2 n-series are like compared to this one is it just the fact it has a Carl Zeiss optics camera lens, whats the difference of having a Carl Zeiss optics lens to the ones?