Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1
- ?
- Anonymous
- L6%
- 03 Oct 2014
if it had a optical zoom it would be thicker and it wasn't a phone any more.with 1 inch sensor it's mostly for photography so don't look at it just the way you look at galaxy models.
- D
- AnonD-314205
- uED
- 01 Oct 2014
Battery is only 2600mAh which SMALLER than Samsung S5.
With Camera motor, etc. I believe this will be Battery hungry sucker... Gosh!
- p
- parad
- uED
- 01 Oct 2014
Battery is only 2600mAh which SMALLER than Samsung S5.
With Camera motor, etc. I believe this will be Battery hungry sucker... Gosh!
- j
- jameel
- uvG
- 21 Sep 2014
This device is too over priced. Doesn't seem worth buying. A bid sensor on a 20mp is not enough coupled with no xenon flash. A big letdown. Like all other Panasonic devices this is again a flop show. Seems that company has used all the hardware to make this handset. No use if no optical zoom. Wake up panasonic! And better luck next time.
- i
- irshad
- 6Qf
- 18 Sep 2014
wellcom panasonic iam cheering on it
- O
- Omar Mohamed
- fk6
- 17 Sep 2014
vito, 17 Sep 2014yes,because you can see no more then 22-24 FPS.Not True !
We can see more than 160 fps.
60 fps:
http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_141098267706611&key=216b1420c6a6c8cb4832eb40987dfb59&libId=92405eef-bd8d-40f1-9a35-188570bacf91&loc=http%3A%2F%2Farabhardware.net%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D360068&v=1&out=http%3A%2F%2Fboallen.com%2Fassets%2Fflash%2Ffps-compare%2Ffps-compare-60fps.swf&title=%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B6%D9%8A%D8%AD%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%8A%D9%85%20%D8%AD%D9%88%D9%84%20%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA%20%D8%B9%D8%AF%D8%AF%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA(FPS)%20%D9%88%20%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%89%20%D9%85%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%B8%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%A7&txt=http%3A%2F%2Fboallen.com%2Fassets%2Fflash%2Ffps-...pare-60fps.swf
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0F2
- 17 Sep 2014
Does this device capture stereo video recording or only mono?
- v
- vito
- pm6
- 17 Sep 2014
Anonymous, 16 Sep 2014HD Video @ only 30fps???yes,because you can see no more then 22-24 FPS.
- D
- AnonD-114277
- jZ7
- 17 Sep 2014
Can someone please confirm this spec?
2160p@15fps
It seems pretty useless to film at such a high resolution only to get 15 choppy frames per second?
- c
- cordyceps
- SwA
- 17 Sep 2014
no optical zoom, no xenon flash and only 15fps???
what a bummer by a high tech company. Pitty!
- D
- AnonD-306852
- akI
- 17 Sep 2014
I have always asked why panasonic won't produce a good phone because I have many electronics produced by panasonic and they are the best. This phone is amazing and there cameras is very good and I think the camera of this phone will be amazing too . The display very nice and have very good pixel density. I will buy this phone ofcourse . Iam turning from sony and nokia to panasonic :-)
- D
- AnonD-173329
- 2Tw
- 17 Sep 2014
Panasonic done wonderful job!!! It is better than galaxy camera
- y
- yuukun
- ibh
- 17 Sep 2014
seriously ? 15FPS 2160 HA ! 1080p 30fps LOL
- D
- AnonD-181524
- Bw@
- 17 Sep 2014
Its lightweight has quite a big sensor for a smartphone its high end. I would imagine this will be quite expensive.
- ?
- Anonymous
- gy5
- 16 Sep 2014
HD Video @ only 30fps???
- ?
- Anonymous
- s0$
- 16 Sep 2014
If it is really a camera then it should have had these 2: Xenon flash, and no-quality-loss zoom (Optical preferred. I was interested at first, but when I noticed those to be missing I lost the interest. Good luck Pana
- D
- AnonD-265341
- m7I
- 16 Sep 2014
ankit, 16 Sep 2014Its confi is same as xiaomi mi3 but m sure its price won't ... moreNot the quality either 😉
- k
- khank20
- nCd
- 16 Sep 2014
this is my phone
- D
- AnonD-306884
- kS2
- 16 Sep 2014
i would consider if it has ois and 5in screen.
- c
- cccsmbhandari@gmail.
- U{j
- 16 Sep 2014
no use.. xenon flash is missing.....