Motorola Moto G (2014) review: Baby steps
- A
- AdamBoy64
- Fv4
- 23 Sep 2014
Think I'd prefer to find the original Moto G than the 2014 version.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mRf
- 23 Sep 2014
I am dissapointed with the new Moto G i was expecting a higher clocked Snapdragon CPU at least 1.5-1.6 Ghz and at least 1.5-2 GB RAM but with a slightly higher price tag $25-€30 higher. If Motorola released Moto G with those specs it would sell more.
- D
- AnonD-306960
- 45F
- 23 Sep 2014
So basically the Moto G LTE is better or the same if you don't mind the worse camera, smaller screen, or no stereo speakers.
- D
- AnonD-282597
- 61X
- 23 Sep 2014
Are the speakers good enough like the old Moto G? Ouch, that battery life is pretty low...
- G
- Good_advice
- n{}
- 22 Sep 2014
BEFORE you buy - take a look at Motorola support forums - people are complaining about some basic bugs (drop of signal, issues with connectivity) for months and there is no response from Motorola: https://forums.motorola.com/hives/3ba9b2429c/summary. Buy only if you expect no customer support.
- ?
- Anonymous
- TqY
- 22 Sep 2014
where's screen brightness? speaker loudness?
- d
- dontask
- L2s
- 22 Sep 2014
dontask, 22 Sep 2014Battery life is a flop. Don't know if they think it is ok t... moreooops it's moto G.. my bad. Lack of sleep is bad for my brain..
- d
- dontask
- L2s
- 22 Sep 2014
Battery life is a flop. Don't know if they think it is ok to give such a weak battery and make it up with fast charger or what. But for me this is really really bad. It's like a phone from 2 years ago. 50h endurance and 6h web browsing..
I know I'm getting Xperia Z3 compact, best battery life!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 01c
- 22 Sep 2014
Camera has improved a lot. :) now I'm sad that I bought the old Moto G for my wife 2 months ago lol. Should've waited for this one.
- ?
- Anonymous
- NZq
- 22 Sep 2014
only 50R endurance rating.