Samsung Galaxy S10+ review

27 February 2019
Punch out a hole in the display, add an extra camera on the back, do the mandatory yearly updates to the internals and you'd end up with a Samsung Galaxy S10+ - that is, if you started out with an S9+ if it wasn't obvious. Only that would be oversimplifying it, and we'd rather explore the nuances.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • ssY
  • 01 Mar 2019

Recow, 28 Feb 2019I saw. Something surround the punch hole? Maybe? Yeah just an affect when you use the front camera.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • ssY
    • 01 Mar 2019

    Galaxy Note 10, 28 Feb 2019Yes it is becoming like iPhones of late... almost minor pre... moreAnd what other OEM’s improvement nothing just keeps copying Apple and Samsung.

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • nDi
      • 01 Mar 2019

      Anonymous, 28 Feb 2019This kind of test is the most stupid as possible. 1) pe... moreAre you being serious with those points of yours? They make no sense - of course the things you mentioned play a part in battery life - that’s the whole point!

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • nUk
        • 28 Feb 2019

        They give us so little with 10 aniversary edition. I expected more. Camera is same from note 9. Very bad in low light conditions.

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • JrW
          • 28 Feb 2019

          Recow, 28 Feb 2019Just answer my question, we where talking about Battery lif... moreYou mentioned camera too.... That is why I gave full explanation.

          No, this test here does not show reality.
          Nor putting phones to play games for 1h, 1h of benchmark and 1 hour of youtube.
          Youtubers do not simulate daily use.

          I doubt you use your phone exactly like his test. That is the point.
          He only sees %, not even how many mAh each device spends for each task.

          Lets suppose A has 4000 mAh and B has 3500.
          A uses 400 mAh to play 30 min youtube, but B uses 380.
          A used 10%, while B used 10.8%.
          Ppl will think A did better.
          But B was better, just have less total battery.
          They do not consider that.
          Another fail point of these youtube tests.

            • I
            • IM
            • 3C2
            • 28 Feb 2019

            Please share Samsung S10e review also

              • J
              • JJansen
              • 4Hu
              • 28 Feb 2019

              GSMArena: are you sure you didn't want to rerun the studio camera test? Your photo comparison shows the s10+ to definitely provide worse quality in both low and good light settings. Currently, your examples show the S7 to be easily superior to the S10 in low light photography.

                • T
                • TJ
                • mxL
                • 28 Feb 2019

                laci65, 28 Feb 2019yeah in real life the battery is draining much faster, your... moreTrue

                  AnonD-97765, 28 Feb 2019Gsmarena battery tests are too flawed. Nowhere near real li... moreMan! This part I will have to agree with you. I have been a regular reader of GSMarena since GSMarena's birth and though I trust their other tests, I find their battery verdicts to be mismatching with my experience with almost all the phones I've used throughout years.

                  Sad..

                    Wish it was 100% out of the box as that is what I've known and come to expect from Samsung. Actually a huge let down.

                      Anonymous, 28 Feb 2019"You do not have to be expert to judge cam samples" So,... moreJust answer my question, we where talking about Battery life, why change supject ? :D
                      Question was: Does the 91 hours endurance rated by GSM Arena match your real life experience ? That's like 3 day and 19 hours.

                      All these conspiracy theories af yours, please wake up from your paranoid.
                      It very simple you just put 3 phones next to each other and start making photo's and then compare according your own preferences. Some like natural colors other don't .
                      The fact is that the S10+ has a great camera for daily use and a great battery life.
                      Altough i wouldn't pay that amount of money.

                        Reknilador, 28 Feb 2019So what was the point of the release of the S10, aside from... moreYes it is becoming like iPhones of late... almost minor predictable improvement but substantial increase in price every year!! Guaranteed poor sales.. Don't confuse customers in the name of choices and preferences. Too many variants and most likely software developer updates going to get trickier

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • X}6
                          • 28 Feb 2019

                          Anonymous, 28 Feb 2019Especially in low light is horrible, if the Photo compare t... moreXZ3 pics can't even beat galaxy note4 lol. In low light, sony phones are worst among every smartphone brands. I have both XZ3 and note4.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • n7K
                            • 28 Feb 2019

                            @gsmarena Very disappointed to see your camera samples and photo comparison tool show s10+ has lens blur problem at the left side but you don't mention it.

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • LQu
                              • 28 Feb 2019

                              Recow, 28 Feb 2019Man stop acting like they don't know anything. You don't ha... more"You do not have to be expert to judge cam samples"

                              So, I'll offer myself to be jugde of Masterchef, American Idol or maybe even Tokyo 2020 Gymnastics ....

                              That is why these youtubers do poor photo analysis. Same old speech :

                              - A has more natural colors but I prefer the saturated pics from B
                              - C has more details in the shadows than D
                              - E has more noise than F, but I have no idea if it is bad software or less noise reduction applied and dont care, F wins ...

                              Seeing photos added to a video prevents you to know if photos were edited, if wrong manual setting were used to make A look worse than B. You do not even know if those phones were indeed used.
                              I could easily use my phone and just change white balance, exposition value and distance from subject to pretend I have S10+, G8 and Xperia 1. Then create and upload video.

                              1) How about talking about lens flare, ghosting, cromatic aberration, alising, video bitrate, colour space covered, oversharpening, noise reduction?
                              Even the so bashed DxO ( mostly bashed because iPhone will never end up the year as #1) talks about that.

                              2) How about using same settimgs for those that have manual mode sowe can see most difference from software?

                              3) How about scaling all photos to same resolution to prevent the bigger crop of bigger photos from fooling people?

                              4) How about explaining what CROP FACTOR means, so ppl will stop thinking the aperture value f is same no matter sensor size ? Yes, f1.7 for 1/3" is not same of f1.7 for 1/2" ...

                              "You do not need to be expert to judge photos samples" ....... Now I know why another youtuber did blind tests with many phones and Pocophone was #2 .... Cam that is below 2017 flagships.

                                I really don't understand what people are impressed by with the camera here. My S5 genuinely takes more detailed shots than this so long as i don't use the Samsung cam app. I just compared shots i've taken of grass and branches that can be reasonably compared and the S5 is more detailed and natural looking.
                                Compare the snail photo by the S10 here with the same one taken by the S9 and view at 100% zoom on a proper large display and it's clear to me that the S9 has much more natural detail and sharpness.

                                  So what was the point of the release of the S10, aside from the in display fingerprint scanner i don't see any iterative improvements, just the same rehashed thing for 3 generations now, and don't get me started on the price, just dont see a point

                                    Anonymous, 28 Feb 2019There’s no more notification LED and no more iris scanner. I saw. Something surround the punch hole? Maybe?

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • pQr
                                      • 28 Feb 2019

                                      Thank you gsmarena for showing the distortion correction !

                                        Anonymous, 28 Feb 2019Stop watching youtubers .... Silly tests, no knowledge o... moreMan stop acting like they don't know anything. You don't have to be a expert to test battery life or compare camera samples.

                                        The fact is that the s10+ has great battery life i expect the same frim the S10.

                                        Also according to gsmarena endurance is 91 hours thats like how Many days? Ever seen a phone really lasting for 91 hours? There is your proof, wake up.

                                          9 of 15