Samsung Galaxy A50 review
- S
- Sudhvir Hooda
- XTf
- 21 Apr 2019
Samsung has not enabled 4K in A50, but it can be used via third party app as you mentioned in the review.
My question is, the Exynos chip in Samsung A50 is capable of 4K at 60fps as mentioned on Samsung website detailing the chip specifications, whether it can record the videos in 4K at 60 fps, please try it via third party apps for 60fps also and update your review.
- P
- Png
- N7{
- 20 Apr 2019
Panda eyes, 20 Apr 2019It's unfortunate that samsubg still scrimp out on quality c... moreObviously deliberate but yes it's unfortunate. Like how Camera 2 api is only limited in this phone hence you can't use portrait mode and nightsight in Gcam
So if you really want camera performance in Samsung, it's the S and Note series then
- P
- Panda eyes
- ntJ
- 20 Apr 2019
Png, 20 Apr 2019Yeah looking at both phones side by side the A50 with its i... moreIt's unfortunate that samsubg still scrimp out on quality cameras for the A series and still no ois which is annoying. I had the A8 until I broke it and the camera on that was good but bested by other mid rangers such as the Nokia 7.1
- L
- LG Superfan
- vxy
- 20 Apr 2019
IMO Gsmarena should also test battery life with dark mode on OLED phones or atleast do an article on it so we can know how much impact it has
- P
- Png
- N7{
- 20 Apr 2019
Panda eyes, 20 Apr 2019Bigger screen, battery, storage, much more powerful process... moreYeah looking at both phones side by side the A50 with its infinity display does look better as the A5 2017 has bezels. The battery(A50) is also nice it gives me 7-8 hrs of sot. The performance is also great but if you do not play games I doubt you'll notice the difference. In the Camera department that's where i believe you'll see no change, either phone may win depending on the situation. All in all the changes are there but not really significant
- d
- dd
- v{u
- 20 Apr 2019
ronn 89, 19 Apr 2019i was considering the a50 at first ,but i was not impressed... moreHahah Exynos 9610 is better than kirin 710 in performance.
- P
- Panda eyes
- nu2
- 20 Apr 2019
Png, 20 Apr 2019The A50 is not such a huge upgrade from A5 2017 though. It ... moreBigger screen, battery, storage, much more powerful processor and one ui which the A5 won't get as its stuck on oreo. For me it seems quite a definitive upgrade in terms of specs. I'm just disappointed with the omission of Ip68 and glass metal build.
- ?
- Anonymous
- fC}
- 20 Apr 2019
But only slow finger tap unlock but also camera is 2 out of 5 stars. Foolish will buy @ $330.
- P
- Png
- N7{
- 20 Apr 2019
Panda eyes, 19 Apr 2019Had a play with the a50 in the Samsung store. I like the de... moreThe A50 is not such a huge upgrade from A5 2017 though. It only has a better processor/Gpu and i guess a bigger screen if you're into that.
Comparing the camera performance in daylight the A5 2017 mostly has more details but in nightime the A50 captures more
- ?
- Anonymous
- e}v
- 20 Apr 2019
Ph heats so much during normal use that can not be put back in pocket and can't be touch to ear for calling
- h
- hosiney
- av8
- 20 Apr 2019
very good very nice ...
- P
- Panda eyes
- ntJ
- 20 Apr 2019
Mohit Asrani, 20 Apr 2019I had bought it just 1 month ago. A good Experience, must b... moreIs battery life really that bad? Are you a have user?
- M
- Mohit Asrani
- YQx
- 20 Apr 2019
I had bought it just 1 month ago. A good Experience, must buy it. But Samsung, please improve its battery performance because it's not upto the mark. It's Battery work like a 2500 MaH. Not like 4000 MaH. & Please Improve Fingerprint Speed, It's really very slow. Just 2 cons which seems to be improve after next update. Please resolve it. A Good Samsung Smartphone.
- C
- Carlos
- MmS
- 20 Apr 2019
I really like it and was thinking of buying it,but without ip68 I will not.
- P
- Panda eyes
- nu2
- 19 Apr 2019
Had a play with the a50 in the Samsung store. I like the design, the plastic build is OK, no creaks and doesn't feel cheap but lacks the heft, sturdiness and quality of the previous years a8 glass, metal body. Beautiful amoled screen as expected and generally felt fast and fluid. Only £309 in the UK which is a good price considering last year the a8 rrp around £400+. I'll probably get one to replace my a5 2017. I would of preferred premium body and ip68 certification, but the lower price is a nice trade off.
- D
- Dev
- fCE
- 19 Apr 2019
In india 6/64 @ 23000 rs. = 330 $. At this price I wish it should be metal body, & earphone with this phone is very poorest quality by samsung ever. Otherwise performance wise OK. Samsung play different game here with RN7 pro and I think samsung get benefits. Samsung sell a series from local retailers so it's easyl available. But RN7 pro very difficult to get through online flash sale.
- ?
- Anonymous
- SHi
- 19 Apr 2019
320 euro its super expensive.
- A
- ABDULLAH
- bxd
- 19 Apr 2019
bad fingerprint
- r
- ronn 89
- XQ2
- 19 Apr 2019
i was considering the a50 at first ,but i was not impressed with the indisplay finger print scanner and the plastic build. Ive chosen the honor 8x over the a50,mainly coz of sturdy build and the kirin 710 soc.