Samsung Galaxy S20 review
- n
- namenick
- Pfx
- 14 Mar 2020
So dissapointed ,4000 mAh and still worse than the (already not so good) S10 3400 mAh battery,20% bigger battery to be wasted...
- ?
- Anonymous
- rv2
- 14 Mar 2020
It's strange that the S6 with a 2550mAh battery scored similarly to the 4000mAh in this unit. Shows how far we've come in 5 years...
- D
- Denis Toronto
- q}N
- 14 Mar 2020
Don't buy this crap, s20 ultra- phone with best combination of cameras and simply doesn't work!!!! Video cannot focus- is that a joke?!?!?!
Return the phone before you can, apple already closed their stores, if samsung will do the same, phones recieved on March 3 will be yours forever!!!!!
- J
- Joshndjohn
- xtS
- 14 Mar 2020
This phone when compared to the S20 ultra looks rather impressive for a much reduced price. But what's baffling is the fact that a 2020 flagship is still way behind Apple's phones of 2019 in terms of CPU performance. That's the sort of differential quality that makes iPhone adherents not flutter an inch!
- N
- No matter
- 0xQ
- 14 Mar 2020
Again stupid amounts of HDR in post procesing. I can't even look to photo samples. They look horrible.
- m
- miki69
- aqX
- 14 Mar 2020
Thanks for the review, detailed as always.
For me, the MAIN camera is the only thing I care about, and judging those photos I'm not sold at all. I was expecting significant improvements comparing to 2 years old S9 (s10 is using the same main camera as S9). There are improvements in low light images but not as much as one would've hoped for. As for night mode, in some examples s10 really nailed it (quite by chance I guess). One other thing this comparison shows - S20 Ultra is just a gimmick when it comes to day/night photography, the only area it really excels is zooming, but we already established that.
Not disappointed, but not impressed either.
Regards,
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQu
- 14 Mar 2020
Well gsma, the 80Mbps is too low for 8K.
This would be what you could expect from 4K90, not 8K24.
The 4K24 from Sony is 55Mbps.
Also Samsung decreased the bitrate of 4K videos.
It used to be about 48Mbps.
- THE-TRUTH-REVEALER
- 7tV
- 14 Mar 2020
Exynos processor again lags behind Qualcomm, not necessarily in raw power, but sorely lagging when it comes to optimizing and fine-tuning the processor.
I hope Samsung abandons Exynos or, better yet, starts using it in upper-midrange A-series instead. Since the processor is made by Samsung itself, it would cost them significantly lesser than Qualcomm processors. And since the raw performance is essentially equal, getting them on A-Series will make Samsung a more fierce competitior to the high-end Chinese phone brands like OnePlus, Realme, Oppo, Vivo etc.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3RN
- 14 Mar 2020
Are you sure your battery result test is correct? In most of the video available online the s20 is as good or better than the Note10+
- D
- Dometalican
- B45
- 14 Mar 2020
Welp, saw this battery endurance coming. Sub-par battery endurance, no headphone jack, and waaaaaay too pricey in the US.
ROG2 is looking more like the winner for me unless LG surprises with the G9 or HTC comes in with a proper flagship. This year hasn't been it for flagships in the US.
- t
- themohd
- Ld0
- 14 Mar 2020
GSMArena, please try to get a hold of a Snapdragon S20 and do the battery test.
- M
- Max
- pWe
- 14 Mar 2020
Thanks for great new speaker test, much easier to feel and compare! A minor problem remains - we don't the default audio settings tested for each phone (dolby mode, eq and other) and it can influence a lot.
- S
- Sean
- nw}
- 14 Mar 2020
Sorry,but for the price you pay on these flagships I don't see anything new or revolutionary in terms of outright image quality. Just nothing amazing at all & the last phone to make me go wow for details was the Mate 30 Pro
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0w6
- 14 Mar 2020
4000mAh battery but low Endurance :D lool
- Whackcar
- 6QC
- 14 Mar 2020
The point to keep in mind is that they've reviewed the Exynos version, which has significantly worse performance & battery endurance than Snapdragon version.
Those of you getting the Snapdragon version would get a decent battery life & little to no throttling.
- D
- Disappointed
- 7t%
- 14 Mar 2020
Again Exynos and no different than S10. Wonder why Samsung is hell bent to use it globally. Since the S9, I am eagerly awaiting a proper Samsung compact but, there's is just endless wait. Holding on to my S8 which I downgraded to after a rather disappointing experience with S9. S10e seems like another experiment to play and iPhone Xs is costly. No choices left for the consumer of compact device. Extinct species.
- A
- Anders
- 3Jn
- 14 Mar 2020
Reall disappointing battery life considering the size of battery. Bad optimisation it seems
- I
- IpsDisplay
- Ivd
- 14 Mar 2020
So Samsung continues to have the worst battery life in all history it's the same with their M series and their 6000mah
And let's not forget the S20 ultras horrible 5000mah battery
Not even the OLED screen that people claim and worship to be battery efficiency can help
The camera on this is respectable at least
Exynos still sucksss!
Like seriously what are you really paying for when you buy samsung flagship phones nowadays
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQu
- 14 Mar 2020
Too subpar battery.
Note 10+ with 21,5% more screen but just 7,5% more battery did 107h against 78.