Samsung Galaxy S22+ review

21 February 2022


Sort by:

  • R
  • Rkm
  • Dk@
  • 22 Feb 2022

Yielar, 22 Feb 2022You must be confused. Massive step forward for the S22 line... moreYou must not have looked at the samples provided here. I also have specifically said these samples.
Look at those grass, those tree barks, twigs and branches.

It's always better to form your own opinion rather than taking reviewers words blindly.

    • u
    • ups
    • pmy
    • 22 Feb 2022

    Rkm, 22 Feb 2022"Not that lens flare in particular was ever a huge iss... morestill is. I have tried some night photos with 13 pro. Lens flares were horrendous

      • P
      • P C M
      • XSy
      • 22 Feb 2022

      MediaSnap, 22 Feb 2022How many times do I need to tell you again that geekbench i... moreThen how should they compare.?
      AnTuTu devs say there iOS and Android scores aren't compatible in any way as they are different base.

        • P
        • P C M
        • XSy
        • 22 Feb 2022

        aknsreddy, 22 Feb 2022Battery life is not worth the price they ask. This is the r... moreChinese phones usually have less battery life than Samsung.
        Which world are you from bro !!!

          Rkm, 22 Feb 2022Wow, the photos are a big step back from s21 in these sampl... moreYou must be confused. Massive step forward for the S22 lineup camera wise as the software is next level. Tons of reviews out there will show you this

            • H
            • Haplo
            • MIn
            • 22 Feb 2022

            Oh, wow. The photos look terrible compared with the output of my Pixel 6.

              The photo samples in this article have such a dogs*** lens quality that I highly suspect GSMArena has received the defective unit. Corners are a blurred mess and the sharpness is extremely uneven across the frame, I've checked the actual unit in the store and it wasn't this awful-looking. Maybe time to ask Samsung for another unit and redo the camera test?

                • C
                • Carnage
                • 3Y7
                • 22 Feb 2022

                Anonymous, 21 Feb 2022No charger, no fast charger , no headphones, no usb c adapt... moreLOL. Pouch and stickers???? Smh. Realme and Oppo are indeed great for you.

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • stY
                  • 22 Feb 2022

                  Exynos 2200 is a joke, so is the battery life compared to S21 which already had a joke of exynos 2100...

                    • C
                    • Carnage
                    • 3Y7
                    • 22 Feb 2022

                    So from that vast sea of more interesting and exciting devices you only managed to find only Xiaomi 12 pro, OnePlus and Apple? Those are arguably more boring iterative upgrades than their predecessors with a bit more shortcomings.

                      Extensive review of an unwanted phone.

                        • G
                        • GrahamD
                        • nFH
                        • 22 Feb 2022

                        Too boring for me, little innovation and average battery life. Pass.

                          How many times do I need to tell you again that geekbench is not purely a CPU based test. It's highly dependent on ram speed and channel number and also on CPU cache memory size. Apple's chips have huge cache memory and that is why they perform well on geekbench. But if you include pure cpu based tests like Cinebench the difference comes down sharply. But sadly no cinebench for mobile till now. Tech sites like Anandtech don't include geekbench anymore in their CPU reviews. I am requesting GSMArena to not include geekbench results to show cpu performance. It is misleading.

                            • R
                            • Rkm
                            • Dk@
                            • 22 Feb 2022

                            "Not that lens flare in particular was ever a huge issue on a flagship smartphone camera."
                            I mean wasn't it a pretty big issue in iPhone that they tried to use AI to remove them?

                              • R
                              • Rkm
                              • Dk@
                              • 22 Feb 2022

                              Wow, the photos are a big step back from s21 in these samples. The foliage not only looks like water painting, but it also seems that the lens is inherently soft and is having difficulty resolving finer details.

                                good phone, I like everything about the screen (one of the best), and look there is no chin! 25W only full in 1 hour? wow!! what I don't like is that without a microSD with 128gb for $1000 it's expensive!!

                                  Battery life is not worth the price they ask. This is the reason Chinese phones win the game give what people Want.

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • vjX
                                    • 22 Feb 2022

                                    IpsDisplay, 21 Feb 2022It being used to peak sunlight brightness doesn't not ... moreGo get a room.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • kW$
                                      • 22 Feb 2022

                                      A little surprised that there is no mention of FM radio, presence or absence, in the Review!

                                        IpsDisplay, 21 Feb 2022It being used to peak sunlight brightness doesn't not ... moreIPS displays are rubbish. Poor blacks, poor viewing angles, low brightness, slower response.
                                        I've had my Mate 20X for over 3 years and its OLED screen still looks awesome.

                                          8 of 10