Samsung Galaxy A53 5G review
- k
- km11
- rJj
- 14 Apr 2022
Glad I choose A52s as this is a downgrade rather than upgrade. I hope Samsung doesn't get too many sales from A53 otherwise they will use crappy SoC next year as well.
- r
- rizki1
- Kif
- 14 Apr 2022
higher and higher from A50 which is only €349/$300 back in the days. Slower CPU, bad camera, slow charger, quite speaker, no radio, 3.5mm and charger that's great from samsung.
- ?
- Anonymous
- tZj
- 14 Apr 2022
Red777, 14 Apr 2022I dont get why other people said that thia phone should rec... moreI can see why some people feel that way. Mainly because the A53 doesn't have notable improvement over the A52s. Camera performance also not a big jump from last year.
In fact, the A53 is a downgrade in some areas like performance, battery efficiency and the omission of charger and 3.5mm jack. Only good thing going for the A53 is the promised 4 years OS update.
- ?
- Anonymous
- xhp
- 14 Apr 2022
within $300, u can get phone with sd 870 (one of top tier soc) inside
- F
- FatShady
- CLt
- 14 Apr 2022
Red777, 14 Apr 2022I dont get why other people said that thia phone should rec... moreno one would disagree if its price was like 300$, but its 450$ ffs, its not a cheap phone at all.
- A
- An0n
- tx4
- 14 Apr 2022
It's more the successor of A52 without S. Let's see if there will be A53s in the future.
- R
- Red777
- y6V
- 14 Apr 2022
I dont get why other people said that thia phone should receive below 4 stars? Why? Because a52s is cheaper at has better chipset? That's not how they review phones!! A53.is still a very good phone! Camera quality, battery life and performance is still more than enough for every day usage!! They check the performance of the phone !!!
- ?
- Anonymous
- Uis
- 14 Apr 2022
I support the use of Exynos chipsets in Samsung phones but Samsung needs to put in better processors for the price. If Huawei could do it with their Kirin chipsets, I don't see why Samsung can't.
- ?
- Anonymous
- uS}
- 14 Apr 2022
I guess Samsung Mobile didn't want to use the SD695. Wonder why they didn't went with the D920 instead tho as the M53 did went with a D900.
- S
- Shadocx
- s0V
- 14 Apr 2022
Anonymous, 13 Apr 2022Can someone please advise me as to how or rather WHY this m... moreIt's probably because of the 20:9 aspect ratio and also display size affect that.
- ?
- Anonymous
- p4K
- 14 Apr 2022
Great phone, Samsung is the best
- i
- ithehappy
- tTa
- 14 Apr 2022
I haven't seen more saturated photos from a phone camera in a very long time. What a brilliant job, Samsung. I am sure your classless saturated users will surely appreciate it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8Kf
- 14 Apr 2022
Anonymous, 13 Apr 2022Can someone please advise me as to how or rather WHY this m... moreA53 is 20:9 , while S22 is wider ratio.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8Kf
- 14 Apr 2022
This CPU is so garbage.
- P
- Pumpino
- vtx
- 14 Apr 2022
What, 13 Apr 2022this is successor of a52 not a52s. We don't know if there are plans to introduce an A53s. I believe Samsung introduced the A52s due to it being able to obtain enough SD750Gs to continue manufacturing the A52 5G. If there's no A53s and the A52s disappearing, the A53 is a clear downgrade.
- T
- TedddY
- pA{
- 13 Apr 2022
Every feature is the same or worst than A52s...what a joke.
- ?
- Anonymous
- a0V
- 13 Apr 2022
Anonymous, 13 Apr 2022You notice a difference over 300ppi? I don’t Not an answer. Why does the $450 midranger have a sharper panel than the $999 flagship?
- ?
- Anonymous
- Ljq
- 13 Apr 2022
What, 13 Apr 2022this is successor of a52 not a52s. It doesn't work like this. I replaces the latest a5x that came out, and it's gar bage. Stop making excuses and defending megacorps.
- Z
- Zzz
- tx3
- 13 Apr 2022
FatShady, 13 Apr 2022this one should be a 2.5/5 at most, not a 4/5...
and it is... moreWell,. 4 of 5 is the lowest rating possible here
Very2 rarely gsma rate below 4
4.0 equal to 0
4.1 equal to 1
...
5.0 equal to 10
So in term of 0-10, this phone rating is 0