200MP vs 1-inch - testing the best Android phones for photography

17 March 2023


Sort by:

[deleted post]To be fair, A xenon flash would be pointless for general low-light landscape photography, which many manufacturers seem to be focusing on improving recently. It's useful for medium to low-light portraits (Often in combination with slow sync), but there are definitive cases where you shouldn't be using it from a moral standpoint (Street photography, against animals/pets etc). It's a nice-to-have feature but I would be surprised if anyone decided to put it on their flagship phones.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • mAW
    • 19 Mar 2023

    [deleted post]those phones without a xenon flash would have looked like garbage at night
    1 inch sensor phones don't need flash at all. My x90 pro+ captures more details that my own eyes in very low light without even using night mode so i see no point ruining the mood of the picture with extra light

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • 7X9
      • 19 Mar 2023

      Pixel is still 👑

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • mAW
        • 19 Mar 2023

        GregLu, 18 Mar 2023digital zooms always bee sh#t, what's new pal? Use ... moreexcept is shit only on samsung, taking 6x picture on samsung will look much worse than 7x on vivo especially indoor and low light
        vivo looks the same as samsung on 10x while on hybrid zoom while samsung on pure optical, this says a lot about the quality of the sensors

          SuuperBaka, 19 Mar 2023Xenon flashes are much bigger and need more power. They wou... moreWho uses flash today on smartphones? Having xenon won't be an issue but an unnecessary item. LED leads all the way today.

            DarlingYext, 18 Mar 2023Bigger sensor so you can pull in more light. And doesn't necessarily get the best result in most case scenario.

              [deleted post]Xenon flashes are much bigger and need more power. They wouldn't be viable on current smartphones, especially when during this time of people complaining about overheating issues.

                • D
                • AnonD-1087127
                • 39y
                • 19 Mar 2023

                Anonymous, 17 Mar 2023Yes please, more articles like this! Please, also include... moreYes exactly it is hard nowadays to compare and see the massive difference .. so all these comparisons are completely useless

                  • A
                  • Ai
                  • xD$
                  • 19 Mar 2023

                  Can any of the issues mentioned above be fixed with software updates?

                    None of this is in the interest of the end user, so Meh! Do you want quality photos? buy a real camera* a phone is just to be connected and the camera in case you want to take any photo one day, people don't even know how to use all the sensors... So you just want to point and shoot the image and no longer having to make adjustments as if you were going to record a series or something hahaha

                      Tech Jesus Gattuso, 19 Mar 2023Huawei's last best afford was with p30 and mate40. Aft... moreWell, my point was trying new exotic technology, not the performance in favorite points.
                      When shooting, there are some things you can tweak at least a bit, but there are some you won't be able to, like when shooting 720nm or 850nm.

                        • C
                        • Coco
                        • J88
                        • 19 Mar 2023

                        Jagganatha11, 19 Mar 2023I ONLY rely on results from RAW files on my phone, jpegs pr... moreIf you rely only on RAW then defenitely u should pick up some compact aps-c, u would pay less and have multiple times better quality photos.

                          Madmallu, 18 Mar 2023If the Vivo X90 Pro can beat the ultra flagships here .imag... morePro+ basically has better sensors, its processing is quite provocative tho, some people love it, some hate it. I think the Zeiss natural should be used more for photos so that I can actually get a grip on how a naturalistic the photos from the vivo phones can be. Also, their HDR is too strong for its own good. Their photos lack real contrast, everything's balanced and that's not cool. Contrast is what makes things pop. Would've been cool if they put the Pixel 7, would've really liked to see its results.

                            Anonymous, 19 Mar 2023Came here to see some Xiaomi fanboys, wasn't disappoin... moreDafuq's wrong with you? I own 2 Samsung Ultras. 😃

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • 8uS
                              • 19 Mar 2023

                              walkman8, 18 Mar 2023After looking at every shot full screen on a big screen, I&... moreCame here to see some Xiaomi fanboys, wasn't disappointed. Thanks for the good laugh! (PS: Sony phone owner here).

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • PE3
                                • 19 Mar 2023

                                Using X80 Pro, and I'm not least surprised the X90 photography exceeds the rest esp. in potraits and night mode.

                                Unfortunely, the cream of the crop - X90 Pro Plus is not available in the Global market which translates to you using the China ROM (Origin OS) which does not integrate well with Google system if you are using the X90 Pro Plus.

                                Come on Vivo... make the X90 Pro Plus available to the Global market as well.

                                  • K
                                  • KOT
                                  • MVQ
                                  • 19 Mar 2023

                                  It's not good test, it doesn't show what the best to offer have all of this cameras. For example 200 mpix photos looks absolutely amazing and this is proably best looking photos since Nokia 808 came out. Even 1 inch sensor phones can't achieve this quality. After downscale Samsung photos looks stunning in 50 megapixels. Second place is for VIVO, which has best 12 megapixel camera also fantastic 50 megapixel photos, but not good as Samsung - the real quality is about 25 megapixels.

                                    if gsmarena could add full frame equvilents to the their specs page it would be so useful, +1 if you agree

                                      Speaking as an iPhone user, after reading this article and watching this video:

                                      https://youtu.be/56gEYFEfSjc

                                      My personal hope is that for the next iPhone Apple follow down the larger sensor route as opposed to the higher megapixel one Samsung seem obsessed with.

                                      It seems obvious that the law of diminishing returns is very much at play when increasing megapixel count alone, there does however appear to be tangible benefits to increasing the size of the light gathering surface of a sensor.

                                      I know there are many other factors to be considered, but like I said if somebody were to ask me what is more important more megapixels or a bigger sensor, then I’m going with the latter.

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • KSi
                                        • 19 Mar 2023

                                        Please release this in YouTube

                                          Last First
                                          Prev 6 of 12 Next