Google Pixel 9 Pro XL review

21 August 2024


Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • JH1
  • 21 Aug 2024

Zero, 21 Aug 2024Fixed in Nanoreview... ST: 2005 MT: 4835 Is below Snap... moreAnd gpu is worse than d8300 despite higher variant and 1 more core.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • m51
    • 21 Aug 2024

    Snapdragon 695 hater, 21 Aug 2024After seeing some really good comments and criticism here I... moreThe Pixel 6 Pro got a 4.3 and that piece of junk was plagued with issues.

      Slow charging that's my con. When they're phones which do 100% In 30min. That's the sweet spot

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • xK5
        • 21 Aug 2024

        The AI gimmicks are in full bloom with this one.

          • r
          • rubi
          • 6sS
          • 21 Aug 2024

          another year another useless pixel

            • g
            • gG
            • a3y
            • 21 Aug 2024

            Anonymous, 21 Aug 2024They reviewed phones with worse battery life and never ment... moreMaybe you don't remember.
            From this year's high-end flagships, oppo x7 U and Xiaomi 14 U both had bad battery endurance and both of them had battery in the con list.

              That snail turning into an octopus was the best AI trick! 🤣
              Unblur and Zoom Enhance are disappointing, they only make the image worse and less sharp. 😞

                PanRT, 21 Aug 2024https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=SucwT88p0oY... moreI don't think so

                  After seeing some really good comments and criticism here I would like to know how this scored a 4.4.

                  We all know that this is an expensive phone. If you have a pixel 8 pro there's no reason to upgrade. If you don't have this you could get an S23 ultra for about £650 on amazon.

                  I'm not impressed. Saw a few videos about Gemini and the software experience but all of it is unappealing and marketing gimmicks. It's tools to toy around with.

                    Why is this rated so high?? It costs almost the same as a Galaxy S24 Ultra but doesn't have an Spen or as many useful features as Samsung does. Like Wireless DeX...

                    The Tensor G4 is weaker than the Exynos 2400 used in this year S24 series. This phone should be priced as midrange.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • tsA
                      • 21 Aug 2024

                      Overpriced piece of disposable junk. why bother when you have Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Realme revolutionizing the mobile phone space

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • 32G
                        • 21 Aug 2024

                        Google blocking benchmark software and asking reviewers to not compare it unfavourably to other flagships should tell you all you need to know about their credibility. Google absolutely sucks.

                          To all the people coping with the Tensor G4 chip:

                          It is a midrange chip. Slightly weaker than the 8s gen 3.

                          All the "optimising" cope is useless when running some games like wuthering waves, genshin impact or even diablo immortal.

                          Reviewers like tech chap have noted that frames will drop to 20fps occasionally, which is NOT a flagship device.

                            An allegory: The Humvee is this awesome war wagon, right? No. GM and Detroit diesel invested way too much in to a fuel 'economical' diesel, that in the end no one wanted (Duramax diesel fully replaced) and was such a dog! Slow, pitiful, powerless. But the US government got them cheap and equipped them in their new state of the art jeep replacements.

                              • S
                              • Shahar
                              • nRr
                              • 21 Aug 2024

                              Really? Disabling all the benchmark apps? I wonder what Google is trying to hide? And why does GSMA approve of this?

                                • Z
                                • Zero
                                • LEb
                                • 21 Aug 2024

                                Anonymous, 21 Aug 2024That's lower than dimensity 8200 multi-coreFixed in Nanoreview...
                                ST: 2005
                                MT: 4835

                                Is below Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 and just competes against the Dimensity 8300.

                                  Anonymous, 21 Aug 2024That's lower than dimensity 8200 multi-coreJeez the mid-range chip from 18 months ago ??
                                  No wonder they don't want us to see that

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • JHv
                                    • 21 Aug 2024

                                    Wesker, 21 Aug 2024A quick Google search will tell you TG4 does about 3700 in ... moreThat's lower than dimensity 8200 multi-core

                                      Anonymous, 21 Aug 2024Oof. Google blocking benchmark software during release so b... moreA quick Google search will tell you TG4 does about 3700 in multicore score on Geekbench. S8G3 does about twice that. No wonder they disabled the benchmark apps on review units.

                                        9 of 11