Sony Ericsson Satio vs. Samsung Pixon12: 12MP shootout

21 October 2009
A year's truce must've been enough and some heavyweight sharpshooters are called to arms again. In fact, there's never been a ceasefire in the battle for profit. But we're about to look at the future of cameraphones and the battle to take place is more for glory than anything else.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • BNW
  • 06 Nov 2009

for me satio is a winner

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • 0dq
    • 05 Nov 2009

    SE Satio sold in USA for $599 @Sony!

    TOO expensive and outdated now!

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • v0q
      • 05 Nov 2009

      "Reposted"


      Samsung as everyone knows is giving huge cash back to all major retail and network customers to buy market share. It is good thing they can sustain this practice.. if they didn't have semiconductor business they would be last on the list. Samsung pays operators to not only buy market share but also to pays operators to get a key competitor product off the shelf. Everyone in the industry know that Samsung play dirty like their chairman lee. It is in their blood to play dirty..

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • BNW
        • 05 Nov 2009

        satio is way better

          • t
          • tae
          • nCe
          • 05 Nov 2009

          Anonymous, 02 Nov 2009Nokia "Connecting People" LG "Life's Good" Sony Ericsson ... more"nokia" connecting people
          "LG" life is good
          "SE"= SUPER EFFORT
          hahahahahaha SE boy

            • s
            • secret
            • nCe
            • 05 Nov 2009

            [deleted post]wat the big F 5yrs using a nokia phone its not worth it.
            with its feature bombing battery and hanging up phone duh. plz wake up knock knock!!samsung phone are the best and i know that you know that did nokia pay you????

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • Mfx
              • 05 Nov 2009

              Anonymous, 05 Nov 2009Im not SE fanboy..Im just a fan of a manufacturer who gives... moreWHATEVER! Apple and NOkia is on the level of Samsung,as an elite group of companies, i consider that becuase they are not losers unlike SE which is almost financialy broke and cannot compete with these three companies. Sorry fanboy.

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • v0q
                • 05 Nov 2009

                [deleted post]Im not SE fanboy..Im just a fan of a manufacturer who gives their consumers a RELIABLE specs and durable products..Nokia, Apple and Sony Ericsson

                  • S
                  • Sam
                  • upc
                  • 04 Nov 2009

                  [deleted post]There are many samsung users say there are stilling using the same phone for 2,3 years without any problem,whereas my friends n97 hangs terribly.
                  Not to mention the infamous explosive bl5c batteries.
                  Also sony lose its market when there laptops exploded,they introduced vaio series to regain their market.
                  But yet people like u buys them only to replace them again and again.

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • Mfx
                    • 04 Nov 2009

                    Whatever fanboys, the fact is, nothing can stop SAMSUNG now.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • v0q
                      • 04 Nov 2009

                      Sam, 03 Nov 2009Man u r talking about iphone processor,apple uses sammy pro... moreDid you know why samsung implemented AMOLED technology with their mobiles?That's because their mobiles cant compete with sony,nokia and apple's display legibility..Samsung is giving up their best shots to be competetive but pity, that's all they got..

                      Nokia has only 275 phones while samsung has 497 phones(almost twice nokia's number of phones) but still nokia holds the biggest market share in the industry GLOBALLY..

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • v0q
                        • 04 Nov 2009

                        Sam, 03 Nov 2009Man u r talking about iphone processor,apple uses sammy pro... moreWow,this person is really ins**e..He's telling us that Iphone is using samsung processor??lol

                        Funny and pity..Iphone uses ARM Cortex A8 600 MHz while Jet uses Qualcomm MSM6246 800Mhz processor but still Iphone is a lot faster than Jet..Samsung are in fact supplying Apple with AUDIO processors and that doesnt affect the speed of the phone but the audio quality..Got it??Do some research first my dear..LOL Pity

                          • S
                          • Sam
                          • upY
                          • 03 Nov 2009

                          Anonymous, 03 Nov 2009Omnia HD just got high RESOLUTION video and NOT high QUALIT... moreMan u r talking about iphone processor,apple uses sammy processors,jet is a java phone,yet it has fast processor .if u retards dont buy ss phones,its not going to lose anything.btw according to recent analysis us,uk citizens giving first priority samsung phones.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • v0q
                            • 03 Nov 2009

                            Omnia HD just got high RESOLUTION video and NOT high QUALITY Video..Iphone's 600 mhz processor is still faster than Jet's 800 mhz processor,N86's 28mm wide angle lens is TRULY wider than pixon12's advertised 28mm lens which is actually 30mm ONLY..and most of all fading housing in just few months of usage..

                            Your favorite brand is just good in screwing people with their NOT reliable specs..

                              • S
                              • Sam
                              • up1
                              • 03 Nov 2009

                              Anonymous, 03 Nov 2009Your favorite brand is just good in screwing people with th... moreBoring sony phones for boring people like u.

                                • s
                                • seanarcher
                                • P$Y
                                • 03 Nov 2009

                                I don't seem to understand why only 2 major features are considered - The Camera and the Video quality.

                                From the specifications, apart from video and audio, the performance of a mobile handset under weak signal conditions and throughput data rates in 3G network, quality of video call....these are the main factors to be considered.

                                I would appreciate if GSMArena team, puts up these kind of information rather than stressing about Audio quality, Video Quality and Quality of pictures. These features should be given lesser preference.

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • v0q
                                  • 03 Nov 2009

                                  Anonymous, 03 Nov 2009Your favorite brand is just good in screwing people with th... moreOmnia HD just got high RESOLUTION video and NOT high QUALITY Video..Iphone's 600 mhz processor is still faster than Jet's 800 mhz processor,N86's 28mm wide angle lens is TRULY wider than pixon12's advertised 28mm lens which is actually 30mm ONLY..and most of all fading housing in just few months of usage..

                                  Your favorite brand is just good in screwing people with their NOT reliable specs..

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • v0q
                                    • 03 Nov 2009

                                    Sam, 03 Nov 2009Yes i am die hard samsung fan tell me what other brands go... moreYour favorite brand is just good in screwing people with their NOT realiable specs and fading housings...Fade COPY fade..

                                      • S
                                      • Sam
                                      • upc
                                      • 03 Nov 2009

                                      Anonymous, 02 Nov 2009Pity diehard samsung fan..Is that all that u got??Yes i am die hard samsung fan
                                      tell me what other brands got,just creating lazy,boring phones.

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • ijB
                                        • 03 Nov 2009

                                        Anonymous, 02 Nov 2009Everybody recognized Sony as the only one brand that makes ... moreall sub brands that sony introduced were being put into its grave, that was the analog age were sony was a leader but not the digital age, samsung rules with thier bordeaux series 3 to 8, yepp, digimax and omnia series.Sony can't compete with samsung alone in this era, so it decided to join forces with other loser which is Ericsson and so on and so fort. Whatever sony fans (old generation) will say, sony will always stay with its past (analog age)with no more plans to move on.