Samsung E800
- T
- THE__ONE
- 22 Sep 2004
omg...u're so dumb...u go and have a look at the A650 and it has wireless technology EXACTLY the same bluetooth and I think I'd know about Korean technology because my uncle works in AnyCall manufacturing you 미친새꺄~! don't even tell me what Samsung can and can't do because I know EXACTLY what's going on~!
- T
- THE__TWO
- 22 Sep 2004
SEKYA!!!, SEPALAMA!!! 무지렁이
... DONT MAKE US FOOL NEO-THE ONE...
... I AM FROM NORTH AMERICA, AND WORK IN KOREA FOR SO LONG SO I SHOULD KNOW THE KOREAN TECHNOLOGY.
you have to admit that korean still way behind in terms of wireless technology... have find bluetooth in any korean manufactured phone? a BIG NO!, for fancy things... maybe!
Kansam neda!...
감사합니다.
- T
- THE__ONE
- 22 Sep 2004
hello~ I'm Korean and I think I would know the phone features in Korea and the western markets because I have experienced both~! So yeh...there can be same model phones with different features~! u haven't probably even been to Korea so u can just shut up~!
- n
- nor
- 22 Sep 2004
the best thing i have never seen
- Z
- Zwai
- 21 Sep 2004
E800 is perfect
- J
- Jerry
- 21 Sep 2004
What HI-TECH MObile Phone you are talking?
do you know what technology means? if this phone doesnt have bluetooth and quickshare technology which other mobile phone does!
where is the following features?
- Bluetooth
- MPEG4/MP3 player
- Quickshare
- Sync ML
- HTML browser
- PIM functions
- T
- THE__TWO
- 21 Sep 2004
where you got a phone with the same model and different features? IDiot!
- T
- THE__ONE
- 21 Sep 2004
how is the E700 better...? because it's folder? if that's the case...then it's only ur perspectives...function-wise...definitely this phone kills E700...so go and have another read...
- L
- Laura Lawrenson
- 20 Sep 2004
this phone sucks i dnt want it my mums beatin me up and tellin me to get it so i will i would recommend the samsung e700 its basiclly the same jst a lot betta
- T
- THE_ONE
- 19 Sep 2004
WOH~! Hold you horses sanket...the only reason why E800 doesn't have 265K colour screeen is because the western phone market isn't as competitive as the Korean inner industral side...this E800 version in Korea has ALL the function that you have listed plus it can actually download mp3 files directly...it even can play movies that you get as a memory card...you just slot it in and watch...if that exact functioned phone came out here...it would cost too much...so...you know...this phone isn't that bad...it's just that I'm disappointed that the european people especially underestimate Samsung's technology just because it comes out downgraded from the actual phones...if you REALLY wanna see what Samsung can do...go to Korea and experience REAL Hi-TECH mobile phones...Nokia and the rest are WAY TOO BEHIND~! They should feel lucky that the Samsung phones in western society is down-functioned~!
- s
- sanket makadia
- 17 Sep 2004
just to clarify 2 questions that have been raised: firstly, it has video playback function, NOT video recording. there is a difference so dun misunderstand. secondly, it is certainly NOT a downgrade from the D410. why? cos its a sleeker design (smaller, no antenna, less squarish). its probabaly because of the small size that it is unable to have 262k colours like the D410. and by the way, the D410 is a TFD screen whereas the E800 is TFT. in singapore some shops are selling at around Rs 51700 (which is more expensive than the D410). between the 2, i definitely prefer the E800. but i must say that overall it is still very overpriced cos there is no radio, no bluetooth, only VGA camera, no video, no expansion slot, no PIM platform...whereas nokia 7210 which is about $40000 in singapore has most of the above function plus 1MP camera. but i am definitely NOT a nokia fan - i'm just stating facts.
- T
- THE__ONE
- 17 Sep 2004
Personally I wouldn't recommend this phone for numerous reasons...but it really depends on the person...if you're looking for functions...then you'd prolly go for the V600...but like...if you're looking for some kind of new design like the E800 (sliding and slick-looking etc) then buy this...so yeah...
- a
- ary
- 16 Sep 2004
please help - shall i buy this phone or the motorola v600
- j
- jeffrey
- 16 Sep 2004
where is the email client?????????
- j
- jeffrey
- 16 Sep 2004
ugly phone!!!!!!!!!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 15 Sep 2004
less features phone, only 65k colour display monitor. DONT BUY THIS PHONE!
- N
- Nokia person
- 15 Sep 2004
What is the picture quality like on this phone-im used to the nokias but want a good picture quality. Ideally would like the GX30 but i am on orange and this cannot be offered as an upgrade, so its either this or the 6230 but i really want good picture resolution (i have the 7250i now and it must be the worst quality camera ever made!)
- T
- THE__ONE
- 15 Sep 2004
Ok ok ok ...people who say 'this phone has mp3 but E800 has only 64 polyphonice etc...' but once phones hit 64-chord...it basically is a mp3 playing ringtone...who said just because it's 64 polyphonic doens't mean it can't play mp3 files? I can~! Although i didn't buy this particular brand phone but I bought Samsung SGH-D410 and it has EXACTLY the same 64 polyphonice ringtone and it plays mp3 files as ringtones~! YES, true that it takes a little more effort to play the mp3 files compared to mp3 playing phones but it doesn't mean it can't play mp3 files~! so yeah...keep debating but without 'can't play mp3 files' business~~~ :p HAVE FUN
- K
- Kerella
- 14 Sep 2004
Oh and just to add, I dont think this Samsung E800 has MP3 playing capability either so its all Polyphonic if you buy this phone The INNO 75 has MP3 player included so to clarify the INNO 75 does seem like the better choice.
- K
- Kerella
- 14 Sep 2004
Its true INNO 75 is slightly better than this phone in that INNO 75 has FM Radio and 256k screen so it is better in features. But no other phone brand can beat Samsung design so I think this one looks slightly better than INNO 75. This samsing E800 is still a great phone and definately a worthwhile investement. It has a better design than INNO 75 even though they basically look identical.