Samsung Galaxy A01
- ?
- Anonymous
- I@H
- 05 Feb 2020
Which of them is better?
Redmi 7A or Galaxy A01
- ?
- Anonymous
- pRB
- 05 Feb 2020
Goldman , 04 Feb 2020Extremely poor phone from Samsung. Budget doesnt mean you s... moreYour comment is priceless bro i agree with you
- G
- Goldman
- 6Qb
- 04 Feb 2020
Extremely poor phone from Samsung. Budget doesnt mean you start selling trash.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LX7
- 04 Feb 2020
Orange97, 03 Feb 2020Here's a comparison between the Galaxy A01 and Redmi 8. Jud... moreYou are a hardware specs obsessed dude like most people today who think more is necessarily better.
If you are a light user who wants a lighter, smaller phone from a trusted manufacturer you are going to go with the samsung eyes closed.
And then if you go with the redmi you get to pay the better specs through tons of ads which can't be totally controlled, privacy concerns and bad software.
User experience many times is way more important that some specs that many people won't even make use of.
- O
- Orange97
- a3%
- 03 Feb 2020
Here's a comparison between the Galaxy A01 and Redmi 8. Judge by yourself:
• Weight:
Redmi 8: 188g
Galaxy A01: 149g √√√
• Display:
Redmi 8:
IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
6.22 inches, 96.6 cm (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) √√√
720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Galaxy A01:
PLS TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Size 5.7 inches, 77.9 cm (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~301 ppi density) √√√
Chipset: Both pack the SD439. So it's a tie here.
• Battery:
Redmi 8: 5000 mAh √√√
Galaxy A01: 3000 mAh
• RAM/Storage:
Redmi 8: 3/32 - 4/64 √√√
Galaxy A01: 2/16
• Rear Cameras:
Redmi 8: 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF √√√
2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor
Galaxy A01: 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF
2 MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm, depth sensor
• Selfies:
Redmi 8: 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm √√√
Galaxy A01: 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5", 1.12µm
• USB:
Redmi 8: Type-C √√√
Galaxy A01: MicroUSB
• Fingerprint sensor:
Redmi 8: √√√
Galaxy A01: Nope!
• Price: Both around $100.
All in all, A01's only advantages are the Weight and the slightly better Pixel Density. Otherwise, it's a complete TRASH compared to Redmi 8.
So don't waste your money for the A01.
- ?
- Anonymous
- vMf
- 03 Feb 2020
Brian, 22 Jan 2020No joke! Actually compact, IP68, S.Amoled with Always on di... moreYou forgot crappy 16gb storage
- ?
- Anonymous
- LX7
- 02 Feb 2020
MWM, 01 Feb 2020I think Samsung forgot to launch this crap back in 2018. Wo... moreIt's going to be less than 100, SD 439 is fine and inline for the price range, this is good for a kid, a mom or as a secondary phone, you can add an SD card.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mi6
- 01 Feb 2020
It have Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12nm), same as Xiaomi Redmi 7a, 8a, Redmi 8, and Nokia 4.2, price is about 90 euros
- O
- OfferZ
- nBH
- 01 Feb 2020
Probably DOA, 2gb ram, 16gb storage and a terrible screen.
- A
- Alexandru
- JEk
- 01 Feb 2020
My samsung J5 from 2017 is much better then this thing lol :)
Still 2gb ram and 16 storage, but mine have 13 mp camera on both sides, front and back
And j5 2017 also have aluminium body and frame, it even feels premium compared with this one lol
Well, it seems also much cheaper then what i have so we should not expect too much from it
- M
- MWM
- KcP
- 01 Feb 2020
I think Samsung forgot to launch this crap back in 2018. Worst configuration in USD 100+
- ?
- Anonymous
- mi6
- 01 Feb 2020
AnonD-765530, 17 Jan 2020Have u heard of galaxy m20.m30 a20 and a30??M20, M30, A20, A30, was not for EU market for some reason.. Only, A10, A40, A50, A70, A80, A30s, and in some markets, M30s.. Thats it, i hope this time Samsung will change mind.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Lx%
- 01 Feb 2020
This Phone Sucks Becuse Is Slow Charge Worst Storage With RAM & This Is The Stupidest Phone Ever
- C
- Caknoor
- tht
- 26 Jan 2020
is there a 32gb version??
- ?
- Anonymous
- y$9
- 25 Jan 2020
RZA, 21 Jan 2020Mobile should be with in 6 inch and 7.5mm thin 4gb 4000 to ... morebruh this is just a cheap (less than $100) phone. and is good for people for small hands since it has a 5.7 inch screen, there's no use of using a 4000/5000 mah battery since the processor is already really efficient. also this uses a exynos 7884 (14nm process) based on the clockspeeds and this is really efficient so yeah.
- B
- Brian
- msV
- 22 Jan 2020
Pepe, 17 Jan 2020I still prefer my old Galaxy A3 2017.No joke! Actually compact, IP68, S.Amoled with Always on display and a really good fingerprint scanner.
Any new midrange Samsung seems like a joke in comparison.
- R
- RZA
- KI$
- 21 Jan 2020
Mobile should be with in 6 inch and 7.5mm thin 4gb 4000 to 4500 mah with power mode e.g galaxy A3 2015
With solid Mattel body.. i want to buy mid range phone but all phones are 6.5 or more display . In Samsung there is no options with amoled display
- P
- Pepe
- n$V
- 17 Jan 2020
I still prefer my old Galaxy A3 2017.
- D
- AnonD-765530
- 0wq
- 17 Jan 2020
bad phone, 16 Jan 2020why they don't make a phone with 4G ram and 4000 batry with... moreHave u heard of galaxy m20.m30 a20 and a30??
- b
- bad phone
- gCn
- 16 Jan 2020
why they don't make a phone with 4G ram and 4000 batry with beautiful design and med price..i think a lot phone lovers will try to buy it..but 2 Gb ram in 2020 its just a joke we are trying to find good phone with good ram becuase a lot of apps now takes big space of ram and even apps of they system alone it takes nearly 1 GB..im using now samsung phone with 1 Gb ram i deleted a lot of system apps and i am frezing google play services and other apps of system which working in background because this fuking samsung phone its just block and stack many times and sometimes i have to format it from recovery mode i does not even start! u can't install a lot of apps..this only because the problem of ram...so if u are stupid just buy this phone lol