Samsung Galaxy A54
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 02 Apr 2023
mr x, 02 Apr 2023even though this is a good phone.. im not an exynos fan, th... moreExynos is good for gaming and emulation if its properly optimized.
- ?
- Anonymous
- JQ1
- 02 Apr 2023
mr x, 02 Apr 2023even though this is a good phone.. im not an exynos fan, th... moreAnd camera and battery doesn't exist?
- M
- Minu
- ter
- 02 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023Your Galaxy j3 is a low-end phone, isn't made for dura... moreIt definitely didn't age well but it did manage to survive real life tantrums
- d
- dgg
- A5t
- 02 Apr 2023
have a53, Dxomark says camera just marginally better, mostly video; if that turns your crank. Battery is awesome it seems as a53 was great, not attached to airport charger like iphone nerds. Weight, width and bezels have me saying no!!!! larger bezel than a53 weight is too high. Chip is just ok, this chip should of been in the A53
- T
- Todorson
- pwX
- 02 Apr 2023
Exynos vs SD - never ending debate, same as Intel vs AMD.
While in real life, 99,9% of you literally use no more than 10% of CPU power and hardware resources for things you really need - mail, web surfing, streaming services, music, alarm, calendar, maps and few more useful apps.
OS with apps optimization and fluidity, outdoor screen brightness, decent camera and good battery life is what really makes the difference, everything else you can flush down the toilet in real life unless 0,1% of you who use handy as a tool for a living must include premium CPU and camera, bulletproof case and screen, more storage, etc...
Gaming!?!?
Really, get serious people, or you will end up fked in life big time (unless you already are).
- evilboy
- J6@
- 02 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023High-end Exynos are excellentwell i have that too . but not buying anything made in china for that if i have get subpar product i will idc .
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%{
- 02 Apr 2023
Too bad for shitty exynos, with SD 7+ Gen 2 this phone would be amazing.
- b
- bobby53787
- s8Y
- 02 Apr 2023
Raj.s, 01 Apr 2023Galaxy A54 5G is downgrade over Galaxy A73 5G because it�... moreit's not about having megapixels or scores from benchmarks, but how it performs in real-time is what matters most.
it's not lacks, it is lakhs.
I have checked both the devices and A54 is far better than A74 in terms of Camera, display and speakers.
- b
- bobby53787
- s8Y
- 02 Apr 2023
Raj.s, 01 Apr 2023Galaxy A54 5G is downgrade over Galaxy A73 5G because it�... morenever speak about anything without having a perception.
- A
- AutoFocus
- 7k3
- 02 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023"Ans: Samsung has the option to use superior TSMC fab ... moreQuote:
1. Samsung couldn't use the TSCM process node, is against the competition.
2. Samsung hasn't confirmed anything, second Exynos 2400 has the possibility to come in the next S24 series.
The Exynos 2200 wasn't a disaster debacle, performs better than their Qualcomm counterpart and beat the Qualcomm 8 gen 2 in RTX performance.
https://www.gizchina.com/2023/01/16/exynos-leaves-snapdragon-in-the-dust-in-a-new-performance-test/
Reply:
1. TSMC is a foundry for all and nothing stops Samsung from fabing their SOC there. Samsung has no competing chips to fab against the current Snapdragon flagships and the upcoming Gen 3 either hence they dropped the idea of Exynos altogether from S23 and possibly S24 as well.
2. Samsung hasn't confirmed anything about Exynos 2400 either.
3. You buy phone for running that Ray Tracing benchmark lol ? Even high end PC struggle to run Ray Tracing at good frame rates and what is the point of RT in a phone is beyond me.
If you compare real world usage scenarios Galaxy S22 Snapdragon vs Exynos 2200 variants, the Snapdragon variant can be seen clearly performing superior. The SD 8 Gen 1 in S22 is not the best in terms of efficiency as it was built on Samsung fabs just like Exynos were, despite that its performance is superior.
Galaxy S22 Snapdragon vs Exynos 2200 variant
https://youtu.be/5z8sOMOfrfA?t=53
- A
- AutoFocus
- 7k3
- 02 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023Exynos 1380 could compete with the Qualcomm 7 gen 2. You&#... morePlease show where it does when Exynos 1380 hardly at par with a 2021 SD 778G.
- m
- mr x
- LEi
- 02 Apr 2023
even though this is a good phone.. im not an exynos fan, this one is lacking a jack 3.5, i like A52s design more than this one.... snapdragon chips are better for gaming , emulation( for gamers), this new galaxy only wins in android update support as it has 4 years of upcoming updates and A52s is waiting for his last major update.
- ?
- Anonymous
- xja
- 02 Apr 2023
Went to a tech store early today to get the new galaxy a54 from my old s10,but found out it will not meet up to what i require so i got an s23 which is very nice
- R
- Raj.s
- U{1
- 01 Apr 2023
Galaxy A54 5G is downgrade over Galaxy A73 5G because it's comes with Exynos 1380 chips, with 5,00,000 lacks score on Antutu with 50MP Triple camera. 38-39k price.
Whether Galaxy A73 5G comes with Snapdragon 778G. Same 5 lacks score on Antutu with 108MP quad camera. 35-36k price range.
- K
- Kujtim Zymeri
- 8rJ
- 01 Apr 2023
I would like even more if would come with Ip68 and telephoto lens.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
evilboy, 01 Apr 2023if i want to burn my money my choice , i earn it not you .High-end Exynos are excellent
- evilboy
- J6@
- 01 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023Exynos 1380 could compete with the Qualcomm 7 gen 2. You&#... moreif i want to burn my money my choice , i earn it not you .
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
AutoFocus, 01 Apr 2023Quote: " If Samsung couldn't put the Exynos 2300 ... more"Ans: Samsung has the option to use superior TSMC fab for fabricating their chips. This was what done by Qualcomm when they burnt their fingers with SD 8 Gen 1 fabricated on Samsung fabs. Since Samsung as no competing option for the SD 8 Gen 2 and later, and after the disaster debacle with Exynos 2200 in the S22, they stopped high end Exynos development for a while and they are rumored to build Exynos from the beginning in an attempt to compete with Qualcomm in the high end. In the meantime they are forced to depend on Snapdragon for their high end. There won't any Exynos for the S24 as well as Samsung is confirmed to be working with Qualcomm for a customized SD 8 Gen 3 variant for it."
1. Samsung couldn't use the TSCM process node, is against the competition.
2." There won't any Exynos for the S24 as well as Samsung is confirmed to be working with Qualcomm for a customized SD 8 Gen 3 variant for it.""
Samsung hasn't confirmed anything, second Exynos 2400 has the possibility to come in the next S24 series.
The Exynos 220 wasn't a disaster debacle, performs better than their Qualcomm counterpart and beat the Qualcomm 8 gen 2 in RTX performance.
https://www.gizchina.com/2023/01/16/exynos-leaves-snapdragon-in-the-dust-in-a-new-performance-test/
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
Truely Samsung user, 01 Apr 2023You are still arguing parity for Exynos 1380 with a 2021 SD... moreExynos 1380 could compete with the Qualcomm 7 gen 2.
You're feeling insecure lmao.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
AutoFocus, 01 Apr 2023Not really. The Exynos variant S22 is still riddled with is... more"Not really. The Exynos variant S22 is still riddled with issues even as of March 2023."
Literally I've checked most of the threats and most of these users even didn't have the Exynos variant, the user that was wondering to switch to the bad battery life have the Qualcomm variant of the S22U, Qualcomm 8 gen 1 is worse than the Exynos 2200 in efficiency as proved in my tests, that are a lot more than yours, and trying to spam the same tests won't change the reality that Qualcomm has proven to be inferior.