Samsung Galaxy A54
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%{
- 02 Apr 2023
Too bad for shitty exynos, with SD 7+ Gen 2 this phone would be amazing.
- b
- bobby53787
- s8Y
- 02 Apr 2023
Raj.s, 01 Apr 2023Galaxy A54 5G is downgrade over Galaxy A73 5G because it�... moreit's not about having megapixels or scores from benchmarks, but how it performs in real-time is what matters most.
it's not lacks, it is lakhs.
I have checked both the devices and A54 is far better than A74 in terms of Camera, display and speakers.
- b
- bobby53787
- s8Y
- 02 Apr 2023
Raj.s, 01 Apr 2023Galaxy A54 5G is downgrade over Galaxy A73 5G because it�... morenever speak about anything without having a perception.
- A
- AutoFocus
- 7k3
- 02 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023"Ans: Samsung has the option to use superior TSMC fab ... moreQuote:
1. Samsung couldn't use the TSCM process node, is against the competition.
2. Samsung hasn't confirmed anything, second Exynos 2400 has the possibility to come in the next S24 series.
The Exynos 2200 wasn't a disaster debacle, performs better than their Qualcomm counterpart and beat the Qualcomm 8 gen 2 in RTX performance.
https://www.gizchina.com/2023/01/16/exynos-leaves-snapdragon-in-the-dust-in-a-new-performance-test/
Reply:
1. TSMC is a foundry for all and nothing stops Samsung from fabing their SOC there. Samsung has no competing chips to fab against the current Snapdragon flagships and the upcoming Gen 3 either hence they dropped the idea of Exynos altogether from S23 and possibly S24 as well.
2. Samsung hasn't confirmed anything about Exynos 2400 either.
3. You buy phone for running that Ray Tracing benchmark lol ? Even high end PC struggle to run Ray Tracing at good frame rates and what is the point of RT in a phone is beyond me.
If you compare real world usage scenarios Galaxy S22 Snapdragon vs Exynos 2200 variants, the Snapdragon variant can be seen clearly performing superior. The SD 8 Gen 1 in S22 is not the best in terms of efficiency as it was built on Samsung fabs just like Exynos were, despite that its performance is superior.
Galaxy S22 Snapdragon vs Exynos 2200 variant
https://youtu.be/5z8sOMOfrfA?t=53
- A
- AutoFocus
- 7k3
- 02 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023Exynos 1380 could compete with the Qualcomm 7 gen 2. You&#... morePlease show where it does when Exynos 1380 hardly at par with a 2021 SD 778G.
- m
- mr x
- LEi
- 02 Apr 2023
even though this is a good phone.. im not an exynos fan, this one is lacking a jack 3.5, i like A52s design more than this one.... snapdragon chips are better for gaming , emulation( for gamers), this new galaxy only wins in android update support as it has 4 years of upcoming updates and A52s is waiting for his last major update.
- ?
- Anonymous
- xja
- 02 Apr 2023
Went to a tech store early today to get the new galaxy a54 from my old s10,but found out it will not meet up to what i require so i got an s23 which is very nice
- R
- Raj.s
- U{1
- 01 Apr 2023
Galaxy A54 5G is downgrade over Galaxy A73 5G because it's comes with Exynos 1380 chips, with 5,00,000 lacks score on Antutu with 50MP Triple camera. 38-39k price.
Whether Galaxy A73 5G comes with Snapdragon 778G. Same 5 lacks score on Antutu with 108MP quad camera. 35-36k price range.
- K
- Kujtim Zymeri
- 8rJ
- 01 Apr 2023
I would like even more if would come with Ip68 and telephoto lens.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
evilboy, 01 Apr 2023if i want to burn my money my choice , i earn it not you .High-end Exynos are excellent
- evilboy
- J6@
- 01 Apr 2023
AnonD-1090716, 01 Apr 2023Exynos 1380 could compete with the Qualcomm 7 gen 2. You&#... moreif i want to burn my money my choice , i earn it not you .
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
AutoFocus, 01 Apr 2023Quote: " If Samsung couldn't put the Exynos 2300 ... more"Ans: Samsung has the option to use superior TSMC fab for fabricating their chips. This was what done by Qualcomm when they burnt their fingers with SD 8 Gen 1 fabricated on Samsung fabs. Since Samsung as no competing option for the SD 8 Gen 2 and later, and after the disaster debacle with Exynos 2200 in the S22, they stopped high end Exynos development for a while and they are rumored to build Exynos from the beginning in an attempt to compete with Qualcomm in the high end. In the meantime they are forced to depend on Snapdragon for their high end. There won't any Exynos for the S24 as well as Samsung is confirmed to be working with Qualcomm for a customized SD 8 Gen 3 variant for it."
1. Samsung couldn't use the TSCM process node, is against the competition.
2." There won't any Exynos for the S24 as well as Samsung is confirmed to be working with Qualcomm for a customized SD 8 Gen 3 variant for it.""
Samsung hasn't confirmed anything, second Exynos 2400 has the possibility to come in the next S24 series.
The Exynos 220 wasn't a disaster debacle, performs better than their Qualcomm counterpart and beat the Qualcomm 8 gen 2 in RTX performance.
https://www.gizchina.com/2023/01/16/exynos-leaves-snapdragon-in-the-dust-in-a-new-performance-test/
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
Truely Samsung user, 01 Apr 2023You are still arguing parity for Exynos 1380 with a 2021 SD... moreExynos 1380 could compete with the Qualcomm 7 gen 2.
You're feeling insecure lmao.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
AutoFocus, 01 Apr 2023Not really. The Exynos variant S22 is still riddled with is... more"Not really. The Exynos variant S22 is still riddled with issues even as of March 2023."
Literally I've checked most of the threats and most of these users even didn't have the Exynos variant, the user that was wondering to switch to the bad battery life have the Qualcomm variant of the S22U, Qualcomm 8 gen 1 is worse than the Exynos 2200 in efficiency as proved in my tests, that are a lot more than yours, and trying to spam the same tests won't change the reality that Qualcomm has proven to be inferior.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
AutoFocus, 01 Apr 2023Of coerce it is valid as it is scientific not some random y... moreActually your tests aren't valid at all, and these videos aren't made by a Samsung sponsor fan, those tests are accurate.
https://youtu.be/kTH21LnZ3So
Exynos 2200 still have better efficiency.
https://youtu.be/xBNroDYGLx4
In performance Exynos is better overall.
Your last video isn't accurate since the Exynos 2200 wasn't optimized for mast apps at that time.
https://youtu.be/qNhFiPpl8sI
But even the Note 20U Exynos beats the iPhone 13 pro max, lmao and is an speed test.
So Qualcomm is worse."
Qualcomm in most videos couldn't beat Exynos, stop spamming your videos that aren't accurate anymore. Qualcomm lose.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
Truely Samsung user, 01 Apr 2023What AutoFocus quoted was more authentic. Is less authenthic.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
Minu, 01 Apr 2023Agreed. Especially since I used a Galaxy J3, which was a n... moreYour Galaxy j3 is a low-end phone, isn't made for durability like the high-end flagships.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 01 Apr 2023
Anonymous, 31 Mar 2023samsung phones work for 1 year only. After software update ... moreStop commenting without have proved the high-end Samsung flagships, those phones can last more than 5 years.
Don't compare low end and mid-range phones durability with high-end flagship phones.
- ?
- Anonymous
- nUL
- 01 Apr 2023
evilboy, 01 Apr 2023those who complaining about exynos go buy different brand n... moreMost people on here seem to be just poor little kids who are salty that they can't afford a flagship and instead of buying whats in their budget they spend all day bitching about how supposedly bad mid range phones like the A54 are without even owning one. It's pathetic.
- ?
- Anonymous
- nUL
- 01 Apr 2023
Anonymous, 31 Mar 2023samsung phones work for 1 year only. After software update ... moreWhat an incredibly stupid statement. It's clear that you never even used a Samsung before.