Samsung Galaxy F62
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy F62

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • A
  • Ahmad
  • X06
  • 19 Feb 2021

bobby53787, 19 Feb 2021Samsung F62 or Samsung A52 5G ?A52 definetly

    Anonymous, 18 Feb 2021Brother. Go for Samsung F62Samsung F62 or Samsung A52 5G ?

      • w
      • w
      • bEQ
      • 19 Feb 2021

      The only good thing is 7000mah otherwise as good as m51 i think. No 5g makes it a poor choice

        • a
        • aestheticugh
        • gNS
        • 19 Feb 2021

        AnonD-843228, 18 Feb 2021amoled? no thanks. ips lcd rules. 😎Lmao what

          • T
          • TonyRedgrave
          • t44
          • 19 Feb 2021

          Good p/p product
          Samsung can finally makes use of all the remaining 9825 in their storage, great move!

            think if Samsung post the galaxy note 21 ultra with an Exynos 2100 and adaptive refresh rate and a 7000 mah battery but if Samsung does it they should check so it doesn't become galaxy note 7

              a nice value for money

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • vGT
                • 19 Feb 2021

                if you see the specs carefully its value for money but still only one problem Samsung's chip lets see if they improved as they did with the galaxy s21

                  • S
                  • Steve
                  • XSD
                  • 19 Feb 2021

                  phone videographers will hate it, no 60fts, no 4K at all?

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • 7kb
                    • 19 Feb 2021

                    AnonD-804996, 18 Feb 2021Exynos 9825 was used in 2 years old Samsung flagships. I do... moreYes 7000mah inside 9.5mm thickness is super impressive.
                    This looks like a really good phone at 270 Euros. Good for people from USA/Canada who don't have access to Chinese budget/mid-range Kings.

                      • 5
                      • 54-Rchasm
                      • bJb
                      • 19 Feb 2021

                      joe nodden, 18 Feb 2021Keyword: "Some" If a student aims to score hig... moreNot OP but

                      Yeah, keyword: "Some". But the guy did mention "lower chipset at a higher price". Maybe there's just 2-3 phones that fits that description. But wait, he also mentioned "the same specs" other than the chipset.

                      Using phone finder, a miniscule amount of idk 450 phones don't fit his description of "same specs". Well, I give up, so you're wrong. And so is he. No phone is worse than the F62, it's THE worst phone of its class. Probably has dyslexia.

                      Don't worry, people still trust you. You've got fair judgement.

                        AnonD-843228, 18 Feb 2021amoled? no thanks. ips lcd rules. 😎Did you seriously just point out the one good thing about this phone and act like it's a flaw. Have fun with your grey blacks.

                          SON GOKU, 18 Feb 2021Some midragners have the same specs with a lower chipest at... moreKeyword: "Some"

                          If a student aims to score higher than some of the worst in the class on a test, does that make the student a good student? If not, then why should a phone be considered good for being better than some of the worst?

                            • D
                            • AnonD-843228
                            • 3V9
                            • 18 Feb 2021

                            amoled? no thanks. ips lcd rules. 😎

                              • S
                              • SON GOKU
                              • ImB
                              • 18 Feb 2021

                              joe nodden, 18 Feb 2021The design is so ugly, on top of the materials. They could&... moreSome midragners have the same specs with a lower chipest at a higher price. I wouldn't say this is a bad design, it just doesn't have enough pizzazz. Lastly, Samsung added plastic to keep the price down.

                                • D
                                • AnonD-804996
                                • M}3
                                • 18 Feb 2021

                                Anonymous, 18 Feb 2021Most are saying that they used 2 years old exynos chipset. ... moreExynos 9825 was used in 2 years old Samsung flagships. I don't think any Snapdragon 460 is comparable to that given it's a year old chipset used in budget phones. Exynos 9825, 6/8GB RAM and 7000mAh battery makes it actually a pretty decent device.

                                  • A
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • f}v
                                  • 18 Feb 2021

                                  Anonymous, 15 Feb 2021We need help here please. Which is better Samsung Galaxy M5... moreBrother. Go for Samsung F62

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • M}b
                                    • 18 Feb 2021

                                    Anonymous, 18 Feb 2021Most are saying that they used 2 years old exynos chipset. ... moreOnly mediatek chipsets can be slower than sd4xx series.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • tVw
                                      • 18 Feb 2021

                                      Plastic chassis don't really bother me IF this is the newer process = 80+% ocean sourced recycled then we're actually paying to save the environment. Problem is no one knows if it's even that and the choice colour schemes here lol I'm actually mildly shocked that Samsung green lighted this at all.

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • PSB
                                        • 18 Feb 2021

                                        Most are saying that they used 2 years old exynos chipset. Fie! Fie! Shame on Samsung!!! They are pretending that 2 years old exynos is equivalent to snapdragon 460 or something like that. I admit that exynos are weaker than snapdragon in most cases. Maybe that 9825 was weaker than 855 that time. But it doesn't significantly mean it is weaker than snapdragon 750/720 what other manufacturers are giving at this price point. For example, in antutu gpu test sd 750g scores 77000 whereas e9825 scores 180000+. I know antutu is not 100% accurate but this is more than 2.5 times difference. So how bad e9825 will be in gaming? In 3dmark SD750g scores 6 fps whereas this scores 20 fps. Do you know how much the difference is? This phone is really a surprice from samsung. Last year a51 costed even more than this phone but was not even one tenth in terms of performance. Vivo v20 pro costs 7000 inr more than this with worse camera, worse chipset, worse battery that also has 60 hz. So what else can you expect from a renowned brand like samsung????