Samsung Galaxy F62
- ?
- Anonymous
- vGT
- 19 Feb 2021
if you see the specs carefully its value for money but still only one problem Samsung's chip lets see if they improved as they did with the galaxy s21
- S
- Steve
- XSD
- 19 Feb 2021
phone videographers will hate it, no 60fts, no 4K at all?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7kb
- 19 Feb 2021
AnonD-804996, 18 Feb 2021Exynos 9825 was used in 2 years old Samsung flagships. I do... moreYes 7000mah inside 9.5mm thickness is super impressive.
This looks like a really good phone at 270 Euros. Good for people from USA/Canada who don't have access to Chinese budget/mid-range Kings.
- 5
- 54-Rchasm
- bJb
- 19 Feb 2021
joe nodden, 18 Feb 2021Keyword: "Some"
If a student aims to score hig... moreNot OP but
Yeah, keyword: "Some". But the guy did mention "lower chipset at a higher price". Maybe there's just 2-3 phones that fits that description. But wait, he also mentioned "the same specs" other than the chipset.
Using phone finder, a miniscule amount of idk 450 phones don't fit his description of "same specs". Well, I give up, so you're wrong. And so is he. No phone is worse than the F62, it's THE worst phone of its class. Probably has dyslexia.
Don't worry, people still trust you. You've got fair judgement.
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 18 Feb 2021
AnonD-843228, 18 Feb 2021amoled? no thanks. ips lcd rules. 😎Did you seriously just point out the one good thing about this phone and act like it's a flaw. Have fun with your grey blacks.
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 18 Feb 2021
SON GOKU, 18 Feb 2021Some midragners have the same specs with a lower chipest at... moreKeyword: "Some"
If a student aims to score higher than some of the worst in the class on a test, does that make the student a good student? If not, then why should a phone be considered good for being better than some of the worst?
- D
- AnonD-843228
- 3V9
- 18 Feb 2021
amoled? no thanks. ips lcd rules. 😎
- S
- SON GOKU
- ImB
- 18 Feb 2021
joe nodden, 18 Feb 2021The design is so ugly, on top of the materials. They could&... moreSome midragners have the same specs with a lower chipest at a higher price. I wouldn't say this is a bad design, it just doesn't have enough pizzazz. Lastly, Samsung added plastic to keep the price down.
- D
- AnonD-804996
- M}3
- 18 Feb 2021
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2021Most are saying that they used 2 years old exynos chipset. ... moreExynos 9825 was used in 2 years old Samsung flagships. I don't think any Snapdragon 460 is comparable to that given it's a year old chipset used in budget phones. Exynos 9825, 6/8GB RAM and 7000mAh battery makes it actually a pretty decent device.
- A
- Anonymous
- f}v
- 18 Feb 2021
Anonymous, 15 Feb 2021We need help here please. Which is better Samsung Galaxy M5... moreBrother. Go for Samsung F62
- ?
- Anonymous
- M}b
- 18 Feb 2021
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2021Most are saying that they used 2 years old exynos chipset. ... moreOnly mediatek chipsets can be slower than sd4xx series.
- ?
- Anonymous
- tVw
- 18 Feb 2021
Plastic chassis don't really bother me IF this is the newer process = 80+% ocean sourced recycled then we're actually paying to save the environment. Problem is no one knows if it's even that and the choice colour schemes here lol I'm actually mildly shocked that Samsung green lighted this at all.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PSB
- 18 Feb 2021
Most are saying that they used 2 years old exynos chipset. Fie! Fie! Shame on Samsung!!! They are pretending that 2 years old exynos is equivalent to snapdragon 460 or something like that. I admit that exynos are weaker than snapdragon in most cases. Maybe that 9825 was weaker than 855 that time. But it doesn't significantly mean it is weaker than snapdragon 750/720 what other manufacturers are giving at this price point. For example, in antutu gpu test sd 750g scores 77000 whereas e9825 scores 180000+. I know antutu is not 100% accurate but this is more than 2.5 times difference. So how bad e9825 will be in gaming? In 3dmark SD750g scores 6 fps whereas this scores 20 fps. Do you know how much the difference is? This phone is really a surprice from samsung. Last year a51 costed even more than this phone but was not even one tenth in terms of performance. Vivo v20 pro costs 7000 inr more than this with worse camera, worse chipset, worse battery that also has 60 hz. So what else can you expect from a renowned brand like samsung????
- S
- SGF62
- uct
- 18 Feb 2021
Great Alternative To S10/Note10 With Excellent 7000Mah Battery Life.
- ?
- Anonymous
- gqi
- 18 Feb 2021
Damn i can't believe samsung haters are dissing this phone as well. Alongside all the other specs you get an exynos 9825(note 10's chipset) for an incredible price. What else could you want?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8kn
- 18 Feb 2021
secco, 15 Feb 2021Wrong choice as a processor. At least better than SD 7series
- S
- SpeeedY
- mDC
- 18 Feb 2021
Amazing phone for 270 euros...every spec is top. But probably for the indian or chinese market as usual. Other countries have to pay much more for underspecs Samsung phones...
- M
- Manteddy
- Kec
- 18 Feb 2021
are exynos chips good? and how good is the gpu for this phone? isn't a samsung flagship sooo shouldn't be that great?
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 18 Feb 2021
The design is so ugly, on top of the materials. They could've gone with a design that compliments the awful plastic they use, like the Poco M3, but no. They chose to make this phone ugly as hell, on top of the materials, on top of the god awful specs.
- E
- Ethsha007
- sR1
- 18 Feb 2021
TechFlash, 17 Feb 2021Yeah true, but dude....this one is super similar to Mi 10T ... more10t Pro has way better specs and 144hz