Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini
- ?
- Anonymous
- dW2
- 11 Oct 2012
Beoriginal9, 11 Oct 2012Piece of nonsense. Why would they give it the S3 name when ... moreThe Galaxy S falgships have made quite a name for themselves and Samsung was hoping that lending that name to, what I can tell is a repacked Galaxy S Advance, would make people buy this phone.
I myself would have also liked a smaller version of the S3 since I really hate all this 5 inch flagship nonsence, but I guess this just won't be it.
- R
- Rajesh
- 7wC
- 11 Oct 2012
Sony Xperia V is a better one than this at the same price
- D
- AnonD-53352
- nE1
- 11 Oct 2012
Good size though
- a
- amat
- tZj
- 11 Oct 2012
this is supposed to be i9000...
- S
- SparkyStanners
- nE1
- 11 Oct 2012
Love the size, just what I'm after, but disappointed with the camera..
- S
- Ss Supersmart Series
- IVR
- 11 Oct 2012
Same as some other mid-range smartphones such as: Galaxy S Advance...
- e
- e31G
- IVR
- 11 Oct 2012
Not Samsung Galaxy S III Mini, i think it will be Samsung Galaxy S II Plus.
- z
- zayit
- fXv
- 11 Oct 2012
AnonD-75386, 11 Oct 2012wow.. is samsung make a joke? but i really like the size b... morea v8 engine is always superior to a 4 cilinder engine.why do you want galaxy s3 mini to be equal to or closer to the boss galaxy s3 in specs.common sense buddy,common sense.
- z
- zayit
- fXv
- 11 Oct 2012
bunty pahuja , 11 Oct 2012there is no graphics processor (GPU).there is no where in hell can sumsung produce a smartphone that has no GPU. WISE UP MAN!
- D
- AnonD-75386
- sEB
- 11 Oct 2012
wow.. is samsung make a joke?
but i really like the size because it get more smaller than his brother s3..
but need to improve its spec..
batt with 1500 wont last long..
- D
- AnonD-4814
- tA$
- 11 Oct 2012
The specs are really terrible for the price point. If they don't want to put the Super AMOLED HD, at least they should use Super AMOLED+ at WVGA (that's acceptable). And processor wise, I think it's less powerful than the one on the Xperia U :( They should put The same Exynos or S4 clocked at 1.2 ghz, that's make much more sense than this
- m
- malex
- MFM
- 11 Oct 2012
bunty pahuja , 11 Oct 2012there is no graphics processor (GPU).that's because you'll need to buy a graphics card by yourself...
- k
- kakata
- HIu
- 11 Oct 2012
p n p
not release permanently
- s
- singh
- wiR
- 11 Oct 2012
The specs are unclear as not released.... might have to wait. Google is about to launch its own hardware so will wait for that. or simply go for S2 or Galaxy S advance.
- D
- AnonD-70349
- spi
- 11 Oct 2012
This would be a decent phone if it was priced somewhere around 200 Euros for 400 it's to expensive for those specs
- G
- Giorgi-boi
- LaI
- 11 Oct 2012
bunty pahuja , 11 Oct 2012there is no graphics processor (GPU).There is, most probably Mali400.
- f
- finally
- miE
- 11 Oct 2012
this is what I have been waiting for! Lets face it, it is a phone, not a tennis racket, so the size is what matters. for other things there are notebooks and Tabs and Pads.
Who cares that the specs are much too close to samsung galaxy I9000 - 2010 model (which i had and was the best phone - too bad it got stolen) and now im waiting for price on this just to buy it.
I cant understand why would anyone buy anything over 4" as a phone.
- D
- AnonD-44291
- fvB
- 11 Oct 2012
AnonD-70782, 11 Oct 2012Galaxy S Advance is even better than this..it's the same , but the S III mini is thicker but comes with jelly bean
i think this phone is meant to replace the S advance since the S advance is cheap right now , so they made this one to raise the prices again :@
- B
- Bewildered
- vGQ
- 11 Oct 2012
Where is the GPU...???!!! Or is there no GPU available on this model...?! Is the chipset inferior to NovaThor U8500...???!!! God... this phone looks like aa failure from day 1 ...
- A
- Alex
- HIt
- 11 Oct 2012
What the ...!
They think that will die if they won't announce a phone every month !