Samsung Vibrant
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4$E
- 04 Aug 2010
Beware:
AMOLED is definitely worse than a good TFT - ISP with LED back lit.
An important factor that has to be consider for this Super AMOLED is that the light directly beams into eyes from its source which is OLEDs.
All natural vision of human eyes is when the light comes from reflections of light, generated by sun or lamps, over objects: the photon beams don't directly get from source into eyes; also the beam of phones is not reflected as you may think: you don't get back through reflection the original photons from source; the phones are not as ping-pong balls cast back by objects which they hit; the beam is absorbed by objects, converted in energy and the objects emit other photons back in a sub spectrum of the original beam, lower intensity and broader uniformity over object surface thus giving color to objects and thus protecting the eyes from artificial light that maybe dangerous for human retina when comes from artificial powerful punctiform sources. The LED back lit from TFT is diffused over a white panel then by reflection passes though liquid crystals and get into eye so it is a reflected light, not the original light. OLED like CRT colored phosphors or plasma's pixels directly beam the light into eyes thus you are not protected from X-rays and ultraviolet emissions (UV radiation) and high energy photons which make lesions in organic tissue.
So, TFT displays are safer for health than AMOLED and CRT and plasma displays.
- a
- amk
- jKr
- 04 Aug 2010
That's for sure that there is "No front facing camera for At&t and T Mobile version" Galaxy S handsets. Only Sprint version has front facing camera. Don't know for Verizon version.
- R
- Raptor
- 0a4
- 04 Aug 2010
When AMOLED display gets 1280x800 resolution Vibrant-like one will be better phone then iPhone in all respects
- R
- Raptor
- 0a4
- 04 Aug 2010
[deleted post]"All you shmucks whining about UV from the display, you have more to worry about from the RF radiation emitted from the phone than the UV!"
If anyone is shmuck, then that's not those who care about UV. RF danger is urban legend, not supported by any common sense. UV danger is medical fact understandable to any high school basic physics student who is currently not on heavy drugs.
- a
- andrew
- 4@w
- 04 Aug 2010
Rohit, 03 Aug 2010Can anyone tell me the difference between Samsung Vibrant(t... morethey are the same phone just slightly customized to the different carrier like the nexus one for tmobile and then at&t although this phone doesnt have a front facing camera and the captivate does
- R
- RevenG
- YHx
- 04 Aug 2010
Rohit, 03 Aug 2010Can anyone tell me the difference between Samsung Vibrant(t... moreSamsung Vibrant is for T-Mobile USA and has a 1700/2100 3G band and the Captivate was made for AT&T and has a different 3G band as well as different software tweaks such as blocking of downloading non-market apps.
- ?
- Anonymous
- kGq
- 04 Aug 2010
Rohit, 03 Aug 2010Can anyone tell me the difference between Samsung Vibrant(t... moreThe Samsung Captivate and Samsung Vibrant are basically the same phone (as is the Samsung Epic 4G). They are all US variants of the Samsung Galaxy S for three of the major US cellphone carriers.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4Xw
- 04 Aug 2010
iphone 4 is better because i have both
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0g5
- 04 Aug 2010
Rohit, 03 Aug 2010Can anyone tell me the difference between Samsung Vibrant(t... moredifferent 3G radios. vibrant is T-mobile compatible 3G. Captivate is ATT 3G compatible.
- N
- Nilesh
- D@r
- 03 Aug 2010
Awesome phone....best android phone on t-Mobile. touch and display is awesome. except body this phone is super in all the area. with 2.2 upgrade it would be more fast and awesome device :)
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4Nn
- 03 Aug 2010
i luv thiss phone its so cool and once you start playin on it u cant stop its so addictive]
- s
- steve
- jVr
- 03 Aug 2010
camera flash on phones are worthless
- M
- MrBluetooth
- qiT
- 03 Aug 2010
Rohit, 03 Aug 2010Can anyone tell me the difference between Samsung Vibrant(t... moreCaptivate is the AT&T version of the Galaxy S and the Vibrant is the T-Mobile version, that is the main difference.
- E
- Ej
- tW7
- 03 Aug 2010
Rohit, 03 Aug 2010Can anyone tell me the difference between Samsung Vibrant(t... moreSamsung i897 Captivate got no secondary camera and a radio.
- S
- Shawn
- xgE
- 03 Aug 2010
Just ordered mine from Tmobile - 2-year renewal $164
- j
- jomar marcelo
- whB
- 03 Aug 2010
a perfect phone, but where is the camera flash?
taking night pictures gonna be a problem
- x
- xxx
- 4$v
- 03 Aug 2010
russell, 03 Aug 2010so the F L A S H is the actual deal breaker for you?wow mu... morei never bought phones without flash bro. flash is a useful tool.
- r
- russell
- 4Dd
- 03 Aug 2010
style, 29 Jul 2010NO FLASH, WHAT A WASTE!!!!! I dont work for any phone compa... moreso the F L A S H is the actual deal breaker for you?wow must to get your head checked.ANYBODY who is making a big deal about no flash on this phone is just desperately trying to find something wrong with it.
- R
- Rohit
- iwq
- 03 Aug 2010
Can anyone tell me the difference between Samsung Vibrant(this phone) and Samsung i897-Captivate except looks??????
I dont understand why Samsung is launching two phones of almost same features at the same time.
- n
- nas
- wdJ
- 03 Aug 2010
love dis fone !!