Sony Ericsson C510
- A
- Adrian
- 0Ca
- 23 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009Oh for heavens sake do i have to keep saying this. This pho... moreTotaly agree... For example, when K750 appeared in my country it costed about 400 Euros (2005). Then it was high-end. Now it's mid-range and it costs around 100 Euros if you can still find it in stores, but still has many features, among the autofocus of the camera which most 2.0 MP midrange togay lack, so I think that for a midrange of today, it's more than ok.
K800 was high-end in 2006, while K810 has some software fixes in 2007. High-end => xenon flash... Now they are mid-range (again..) , but with xenon flash :P
C510 is now midrange and found it in a store with about 220 Euros.
Although I can't see any BIG difference between older and newer SE software, except for an extra button for the confirmation key :) the SMS threaded view and the youtube integration, it seems to me that high-end SE phones have a better camera :P than the rest.. Just my impression?
- ?
- Anonymous
- uBF
- 23 May 2009
I am crossing my fingers, hoping that GSMArena will release a review within the upcoming week. I think I will buy this next weekend.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wvU
- 23 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009strongly recommends NOT TO BUY this phone, as i am usng thi... morei got this phone i dont undstabd what your problem turn on the light for night time photos is that to much of a prblem
its one of the best types of sony ericsson phones out
- ?
- Anonymous
- u1E
- 22 May 2009
it has a gr8 camera but depends on the person how u use it
rest all the features r amazing within this price range
- C
- Cyber-shot under dog
- vxm
- 22 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009Oh for heavens sake do i have to keep saying this. This pho... moreyah but now 3.2 megapixels is more like a budget phones this days.... So better with Xenon,and the K800i was a long long time ago (it's like the 8 megapixel era we have now) so 3.2 megapixels is now like the 1.3 or 2 megapixel of the 3.2 megapixel era.
- C
- Cyber-Shot under dog
- vxm
- 22 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009I really don't think the cost of a xenon flash would be tha... morebut the C510 is a mid range phone not a low range phone...
- C
- Cyber-Shot under dog
- vxm
- 22 May 2009
Anonymous, 22 May 2009Xenon consumes battery power and that increases the require... moreC510 uses the standard battery used in k810/k800 so no additional cost for battery....
- n
- nripen deshpando....
- 2S$
- 22 May 2009
(.)(.) breast(best) design
- ?
- Anonymous
- vaQ
- 22 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009I really don't think the cost of a xenon flash would be tha... moreXenon consumes battery power and that increases the required battery capacity. Additional cost. So we're not talking just 10 euros here.
- ?
- Anonymous
- vaQ
- 22 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009I really don't think the cost of a xenon flash would be tha... moreXenon consumes battery power and that increase the requiresd battery capacity. Additional cost. So we're not talking just 10 euros here.
- ?
- Anonymous
- uBF
- 21 May 2009
I really don't think the cost of a xenon flash would be that high. Maybe add 10 euro and I would pay it, but I'm sure if it did have Xenon SE would put the phone way above the added cost of Xenon and class it more as a mid range phone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2SS
- 21 May 2009
strongly recommends NOT TO BUY this phone, as i am usng this phone and its not a good choice because,
3.2 camera is worse than VGA camera in night(can be used in day)
not good sound quality(should only be used in headset mode)
keypad gone in just normal usage
very very cheap phone Better to go for anyother phone like Nokia N series
- ?
- Anonymous
- M@T
- 21 May 2009
Popocatepetl, 20 May 2009OK and you are answering FOUR times for something that most... moreLol i answered 4 times by mistake i kept pressing on submit but my internet connection would not load but it then came up 4 times :-(
- ?
- Anonymous
- M@T
- 21 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009I really wish this phone had the same camera or better than... moreOh for heavens sake do i have to keep saying this. This phone is a budget offering hence no Xenon flash but does have other decent features. The K800i/K810i was not a budget phone when they first came to the market. But they are cheaper now.
- c
- cyber-shot under dog
- vxm
- 21 May 2009
amit, 21 May 2009a stylish phone with good camera!yeah, its true that it doe... moreTry tweaking the equalizer preset,it might help...
- ?
- Anonymous
- vxm
- 21 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009I really wish this phone had the same camera or better than... moreagreed
- C
- Cyber-Shot under dog
- vxm
- 21 May 2009
Anonymous, 21 May 2009That's asking too much. :-) If you put xenon in there, the ... moreWell duh.. I know the price is going up,but it would'nt be that high..... k800/K810 is cheaper even equipped it with xenon,and I know what you might think it's old or something.But adding Xenon would'nt hurt that much.
- ?
- Anonymous
- uBF
- 21 May 2009
I really wish this phone had the same camera or better than K800/K810 including XENON flash. It would be perfect for me needs :)
I may just have to live with LED :'(
- a
- amit
- PSM
- 21 May 2009
a stylish phone with good camera!yeah, its true that it doesnt work well in low light conditions but its a function rich and cheap as well,sound quality is better but too low in noisy enviornment,loudness is missing,is there any tool or firmware upgrade which can increase its sound?
- ?
- Anonymous
- vpd
- 21 May 2009
I would buy k810 if it was a bit thinner and has a bigger screen. It doesn't matter if it did'nt have smile shutter, face recognition and the likes. The picture quality matters the most. As for now i'll put my plan on getting another phone on hold. Let's see what comes up. Samsung phones maybe.