Sony Ericsson T610
- C
- Carlos B. Lucas
- 23 Jun 2003
Just bought one yesterday.I had Nokia 7650 before but due to the bulkiness of Nokia I switch to Ericsson.Camera wise, I think Nokia is at the edge .Memory wise also Nokia is 4MB ,Ericsson is only 2MB.Then when I tried to figure out how to use the Vibration mode,this gave me a lot of problems at first.It's not well documented though I tried to follow the instructions by the book still it didn't work.Until i found one accessories (button like)which I slot in behind the phone which I think is related to the vibration mode and suddenly ,it works.It's not mentioned in the manual or maybe I'm just too excited about my new phone!
But generally it's fine even in other functions compared to Nokia.And I found the GPRS speed improved a lot.
- N
- Neo
- 23 Jun 2003
Yes i am back after a few days, dont' clap now. plz. i am back to defend my sony ericsson!! the numba 1 stunna can go to hell for a start i mean what a prick. (post back if u agree) i would just like to say to all u people out there disrespectin the T610 o plz shut the hell up!!! u probs aint even used it, well i have and it beats any nokia out there. and dont compare them to cars, wot is this mercedes benz n ford focus talk i f u guna talk cars then the aston m,artin vanquih is the sony ercisson calan whikle nokias trail behind in there punk ass Yugos, anyway enough for now if u nokia fans and sonyericsson disers wana chat sum more shit al be ready and waitin to desroy u agen and agen, peace out
- ?
- Anonymous
- 23 Jun 2003
numba 1 stunna, your grand father is the founder of Nokia or something? Nokia is sucessfull even now is because there are MORONS like you supporting them. Anyway, it's your money you're spending and you think that you're getting a good deal out of Nokia. If you think Nokia is so good, START. START from the 9 SERIES and GO ON WHATEVER you WANT. =). I do agree though that the 8 Series was good then at it's time, but that's the last of it. Go on, START. See how well you can defend Nokia. =). Or are you one of those lamers who only resolve to vulgar words to support your ideas because your vocabulary is too small and only filled with filth? The 6 series is a major failure except for the 6600 as it seems potentially good, but it's yet to come out and yet to be seen.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 23 Jun 2003
I did purchase but did not like change with siemens sl55 and now I am satisfied with sl55
- n
- numba 1 stunna
- 22 Jun 2003
fuck all u sony ericsson fans, u guys are shit, u dont compare to nokia, what is that u say oh u have the shitty ass p800, WELL WE HAVE were do i start from 9 series or 8 series, how about 6. Ericsson failed so they had to survive by joining sony, now they both are failing. Good ericsson keep on sucking sony's dick so u keep up the shit work
- P
- Paul (Netherlands)
- 22 Jun 2003
Just a great tellie. Verry big colordisplay (min: not so easy to read in outside day-/sunlight). Also some of the ringtones are difficult to hear when your phone is in your pocket, even in the hardtest stand. The menu is easy to handle by just clicking the icoon on the tabblad. The phonehousing is made of aluminium and looking better/durable than plastic. Standby time is up for a week (over 300 hours), but the phone has no battery status (in time) like the T68 had.
Great games and colorpics. Very good picture quality made by the build-in camera and is also easy to handle. First impression; very good mobile telephone with lots of fun for less than 375 euro (Netherlands). A good buy and better than the Nokia 3650.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 22 Jun 2003
A camera on the phone is only a gimik. It's only for use with the picture phone book and mms. IT'S NOT A DIGITAL CAMERA. You want a camera, get a real one. Even if it has high resolution, the image will still be bad as the lense is still small. Look at the P800 and 7650. They have cameras with res of 640x480, but it will never be as good as even the lowest end digital camera at the res (without compression).
- ?
- Anonymous
- 22 Jun 2003
All dreams about this mobile were broken when I saw it in the market.Nothing is good non camera or shape
- ?
- Anonymous
- 22 Jun 2003
most ugly shape bad resolaions camera with limited funcion and 3rd rate pictures easy to scratches bad mobile over all.
- D
- Dayo
- 21 Jun 2003
T610 is a lovely,well featured aluminium phone and its bound to get attention with everyone provided you can afford it!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 21 Jun 2003
Hugh, read properly. I was TALKING ABOUT MENU. =) You brains has automatically went to a 'Defend Nokia' mode.
- H
- Hugh
- 21 Jun 2003
Great idea !!!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 21 Jun 2003
What should be done is something resembling computers. You buy your mainboard, video, audio, etc, decide what software to install... Why not this freedom??? What if i decide change my 256-color screen. Then I should start searching for a NEW phone. Why not, like changing your monitor of your computer, not change the display of your phone, or software, or adding more memory.... Dynamic-buildable phones.... I like keyboard X, i like that screen Y, why not put them all together and build the phone that you want. Where is our freedom????
- ?
- Anonymous
- 21 Jun 2003
Well, we are proud of it because we paid out sweat and blood for it. If you work so hard to get income and then get a phone that is great, of course you're proud of it. Goes the same when you work hard and pay so much for a crappy phone. Or maybe an 'okay' phone. Then less than a month later a new one comes out. That's what Nokia is doing. They just keep adding and removing small features here and there. Can't they just make it standard for all? Maybe not for the Smartphones and their nomal cell.. but even their normal cell, the only thing common is the battery, screen (which is bad), poly ( which is bad too).
I guess it's just only that many are upset that Nokia is just making nonsence phone compared to others. Look at SE, form the T610 and T68i, there's a very big difference. Menu and all has been improved and all. Look at the 8210/7210/6610. It's all the same. Exactly. They didn't improve it one bit. Maybe by adding some colours here andt here, but not a bit.
- H
- Hugh
- 21 Jun 2003
Phone is not bad. But it is only a phone. Im am pissed of guys like neo. It seems to be a religion to buy sony and hating nokia. cool down. phone is not bad but some posters are so "proud" of it, that they call all other phones bargage ans praise sony forever. maybe they have spent their last cent for this phone.
Cool down. try to be objective.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 20 Jun 2003
Depends on what do you consider better?
You can't compare ANY Lexus to the comfort the S Class and 7 Series gives.
You CAN'T compare ANY Lexus that will EVEN have a match with the M3. You know what I mean. And when I say Lexus, I am talking about both Lexus and Toyota.
- p
- peter
- 20 Jun 2003
i don`t like to say much just this!
it`s really worth the money its a good phone for what you pay you get a lot of technology!
- k
- krishna
- 20 Jun 2003
ive had this phone for a week now and can honestly say that it beats any other phone on the market ( as confirmed by many mobile phone journals / reviews )
nuff said really
- s
- shiggy
- 20 Jun 2003
Nokia is shit, i have a nokia 6100 and 7650, but I also have a SE P800. I must say that I almost never use mij nokia's because I always find a new problem in the sofrware or with the phone itself. I never have any problems with my SE P800, and in the past I used to have a T68i, that phone was also good.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 20 Jun 2003
What about Lexus (toyota)??
That is 10x better than Mercedes and BMW