Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S
- ?
- Anonymous
- TCv
- 21 Sep 2011
kkk, 20 Sep 2011i own a SGS2 and the battery lasts for 9hrs in use and 5day... moreI can believe you - 5 days standby ... without inserting the SIM Card, lol.
- i
- isoneb
- fqI
- 21 Sep 2011
i love sony ericsson, thats the phone i have been using since now. this particular one is interesting. but how do i get it in my locality here in nigeria? i need it. And i really want to buy this phone. thanks to sony ericsson.
- D
- AnonD-15292
- KIx
- 21 Sep 2011
AnonD-22231, 21 Sep 2011Your specs are correct, but the screen quality on SG2 is fa... moredont need to google it bro i have used n8 n the camera sucks also battery time realy bad n it hangs so much
- D
- AnonD-22231
- syH
- 21 Sep 2011
xperia Xray, 21 Sep 2011wow superb words,Your specs are correct, but the screen quality on SG2 is far superior than the Arc. Once you have used Super Amoled, you will NEVER use an obsolete LCD screen.
The best camera phones are made by Nokia and NOT SE. e.g. Nokia N8, just google it and see.
- x
- xperia Xray
- s8c
- 21 Sep 2011
Mad.Deamon, 20 Sep 2011ya you right, arc s cant compare with galaxy s2, but displa... morewow superb words,
- k
- kkk
- nTW
- 20 Sep 2011
Malcolm_SE, 16 Sep 2011Well!! sonyEricsson The best mobile manufacture because of ... morei own a SGS2 and the battery lasts for 9hrs in use and 5days standby
- k
- kk
- Lbc
- 20 Sep 2011
where is the front camera ? Please if you can add front camera thanks
- S
- SFAN
- x5@
- 20 Sep 2011
The only difference between this and the Arc is that it's overclocked. It's a bit faster.
- M
- Mad.Deamon
- tet
- 20 Sep 2011
Dhaval , 19 Sep 2011Sony ericsson really you cant compare this with samsung gal... moreya you right, arc s cant compare with galaxy s2, but display quality is higher than galaxy s2...arc s has sony mobile bravia engine...arc s has 233dpi, but galaxy s2 has only 217dpi, go and see...and camera, no one can beat sony camera quality...
- W
- WALID
- vFk
- 20 Sep 2011
no secondary camera???? i want this camera.... se
- K
- KK
- vwe
- 20 Sep 2011
BAD...............
- M
- Michal
- qbe
- 20 Sep 2011
Although it is a nice phone it is nothing more than standard Arc. No point upgrading if you have an Arc. Just a repackage phone with nothing really new about it.
- D
- Dhaval
- 9xE
- 19 Sep 2011
Sony ericsson really you cant compare this with samsung galaxy s 2... Bcoz galaxy 2 has better features for example- 1 gb ram,super amoled display,1080 p video recording,gorilla display.. Vs sony 512 ram,normal lcd display,720 p video recording,normal display.....
- b
- bataa
- vFk
- 19 Sep 2011
where is the front camera????
- D
- AnonD-22708
- sR1
- 19 Sep 2011
I though that it will have a 4.3 inch screen?
- @
- @@@@
- sR1
- 19 Sep 2011
I though that it will have a 4.3 inch screen?
- g
- ghencea RO
- sp7
- 18 Sep 2011
Why SE keeps making glossy phones? It's not a quality, it's not nice. A shiny phone doesn't make a good impression. Looks cheap. At least the back side could be like Samsung Ace, also helping not to slip on the surface when you put it down. I guess SE doesn't want to sell :D they don't mind their market share. They will end like Alcatel.
- c
- choosenone
- m1}
- 18 Sep 2011
@atul-- check this out :) http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/sony-ericsson-xperia-arc-s-coming-26-september-blackberry-phones-dated-50005062/
i wouldn't mind dual core but no seconday camera, no ram upgrade... aargh..
- x
- xtra.bravo
- PFx
- 18 Sep 2011
you can not compare the sony with samsung, sony made with an elagant design. I think if sony=honda samsung=hyundai, so specify your choice.
- A
- Atul
- vGR
- 17 Sep 2011
guys plz tell me the price of it .. am eager tobuy this .. SE rocks