Sony Xperia 1 II
- ?
- Anonymous
- XGv
- 09 Apr 2020
Truth Sayer, 09 Apr 2020Imagine spending $1500 on this sh!t with only 8GB of RAM wh... moreSony Xperia devices are similar to iPhones...they do not need 12/16gb ram....
- notafanboy
- nJ7
- 09 Apr 2020
Truth Sayer, 09 Apr 2020Imagine spending $1500 on this sh!t with only 8GB of RAM wh... moreImagine thinking you need 16 GB RAM on a smartphone
- A
- AlexP
- rRU
- 09 Apr 2020
[deleted post]Oppo find x2 pro has 65w charger, because it has 2 batteries, which returns to 32.5w charging speed in that phone, not 65w
- T
- Truth Sayer
- 04}
- 09 Apr 2020
Imagine spending $1500 on this sh!t with only 8GB of RAM while you can get an ultra S20 with 16GB of RAM for the same price.
- L
- Li
- 8Uc
- 09 Apr 2020
5G, 4k90hz screen in a 4000 mAh of battery. If it last 5 hours without recharge will be impressive.
- D
- AnonD-923639
- 7Ae
- 09 Apr 2020
r, 09 Apr 2020why so poor front camera...They did kind of cheap out on that part. I personally don't care about taking pics of myself everyday, but I understand that a lot of people do. So I think they missed the mark a bit there to a big audience of instagram users or snapchat.
- D
- AnonD-923639
- 7Ae
- 09 Apr 2020
Anonymous, 09 Apr 2020Take off your tin foil hat please! Ya. Research papers on this subject proving its harder on the battery and decreases longevity. All those crazy researchers with their tinfoil hats. Its much better to lget your sources from trolls on the internet
- A
- AlexP
- rRU
- 09 Apr 2020
Anonymous, 09 Apr 2020Weak for a 4000mah battery. Chinese phones are reaching 92... moreVery fast battery charge is so bad for the battery itself
- ?
- Anonymous
- XRg
- 09 Apr 2020
Anonymous, 08 Apr 202050% in 30 min.
Weak for a 4000mah battery.
Chinese phones are reaching 92% in 30 min.
A quick 0 to 50 takes just 10 min.
Heck even wireless charging is running at 30W and 40W.
Sony simply behind the curve.
- ?
- Anonymous
- XRg
- 09 Apr 2020
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2020Just to be clear, those phones batteries to die out quicker... moreTake off your tin foil hat please!
- r
- r
- IDc
- 09 Apr 2020
why so poor front camera...
- A
- Anonymous
- nx$
- 08 Apr 2020
DantE O2, 08 Apr 2020useless comment you have made . 4k is useless and nothing .... moreYou don't care because you know you are WRONG...
Seriously, how do you have the balls to come on here and say this phone is not 4K (UHD)?
QHD shouldn't even be mentioned here as that is the standard for 2K (which surprisingly is below 4K). If 1644 x 3840 is not 4K (which it is), then what is 1600 x 3840 (12:5)?
- D
- DantE O2
- s3T
- 08 Apr 2020
TheGoldenMellifluous, 08 Apr 2020Well, if you don't care in the first place, why on Earth yo... moreuseless comment you have made . 4k is useless and nothing . UHD is proper standard and already applied everywhere for years now it's not new and there's no other standard alongside it in 4k manner ,
sony in their most high end tvs uses UHD only nothing else, sony most high end cameras only record UHD nothing else. not self made cutt crop of it !!! so one records a video with their Sony A7 (all 4 generations) dslr super camera series but can't even watch it at 1:1 on this phone without it being down scaled back to qhd like any other phone out there. so how ironic is this specially with all the hype about this phone display ?
that's where UHD is UHD and nothing else matters. so yeah i don't care.
sony was the only company that resisted most against making these useless cropped bezel-less screens as all companies were removing bezels but sony didn't. they even made true UHD in their flagships in the past. but in the end they had to join the bezel-less market phones to be able to keep their sales so they stepped over their standards as they had no other choice , don't make this sound like a sony standard while it is not and it won't be and they make their high end products only with UHD standard . sony will never make their DSLR cameras record at this resolution and will never make their tvs like this. this is only due to removing bezels and having to make taller (wider) screens.
if it was sony choice alone they would make proper UHD phones as they showed in that past that's what they want. but phone market went the other way. i got couple sony products myself like tv and camera with best picture among all other companies but i just don't buy a hype fake advertisement not from sony not from any other company.
- D
- DantE O2
- s3T
- 08 Apr 2020
AnonD-923639, 08 Apr 2020So the argument is over. The phone is 4K. The phone is not UHD. sure bro
- TheGoldenMellifluous
- Kxb
- 08 Apr 2020
DantE O2, 08 Apr 2020i don't care. i said this phone is qhd standard wise and ki... moreWell, if you don't care in the first place, why on Earth you would argue with an amount of one whole book of Xperia 1 II forum over very messy situation of 4K that never been standardized properly from the beginning? Worsening the situation that 4K divided into morr, like 4K 3840 and 4K UHD as one of the most popular one. Besides, Sony said it "4K" not UHD, like the others said over and over. Unlike HD, FHD and QHD, 4K wasn't never has exact proper standard, therefore any manufacturers will set their own 4K (with Sony choosing 3840x2160p for 16:9 contents and 3840x1644p for 21:9 contents). But one thing is sure, 4K can be applied to a screen or content that meet the 3840 minimum, not 2160. Remember, this is only to do with the screen ratio adjustment and capabilities of the chipset (S865 only capable displaying of 3840x2160 at 60Hz, same one from Snapdragon 810, so if by your logic of 2160 is the one should be accounted, then it will be 5040x2160 (5K), which no chipset are capable, even S865, and 5K are highly uncommon)
This only discussing the 4K thing, a new standard milestone from 5-6 years ago, we haven't reach the 8K, which's gonna be more complicated, as 8K just getting started... You should give Qualcomm a suggestion mail to upgrade the capabilities to display 8K, so your wishes of your persistence of "2160" in 4K granted, so Sony could go to 5040x2160 in Xperia 1 Mark III... -_-
- D
- AnonD-923639
- Q{4
- 08 Apr 2020
DantE O2, 08 Apr 2020i don't care. i said this phone is qhd standard wise and ki... moreSo the argument is over. The phone is 4K. The phone is not UHD.
- D
- DantE O2
- s3T
- 08 Apr 2020
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2020Sony advertise as 4K, not UHD. Cant you understand that? ... morei don't care. i said this phone is qhd standard wise and kids like you are not understanding it, fanboys.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQw
- 08 Apr 2020
DantE O2, 08 Apr 2020simple. being quad hd is not against being 4k. you can watc... moreSony advertise as 4K, not UHD.
Cant you understand that?
Youtube app does not allow the device to play the video with resolution above what screen has. Otherwise any QHD phone would show option to set 4K like Xperia. But they do not.
If 3840 x 1600 is considered one kind of 4K, how cant you still say 3840 x 1644 is not?
21:9 = 2,3333
2160 x 2,3333 = 5039, 928 (can be said 5040)
5040 x 2160 = 5K , SD865 does not support 5K
4096x2160 is not 21:9
If Samsung, Apple or any cheap chinese put same screen, you will say it is 4K and celebrate.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQw
- 08 Apr 2020
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2020Chinese phones charging within 30 min wired and 1hr wireles... more50% in 30 min.