Sony Xperia 1 II MORE PICTURES

Sony Xperia 1 II

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • s
  • saved
  • jIK
  • 29 May 2020

Ultimate Reviewer, 29 May 2020Bro what? Do you even know what you're talking about? Human... moreMost comments about "who needs LDAC" come from people who have trouble hearing the difference between Sabian and Paiste high hat; these people obviously don't need LDAC to listen to their favorite LGBT singer.

Most comments about "who needs 3.5mm" come from people who never really used their phone for more advanced video recording than just pressing the shutter button; these people have no idea that on a good smartphone the audio jack isn't only used for earplugs but is also an input for a microphone.

Most comments about "who needs 4k" come from people who don't know that 99% modern phone OLED screens have Pentile subpixel layout which means there actually is only half the claimed resolution due to different technology, where 9 pixels look like that:
RG BG RG
BG RG BG
RG BG RG

whereas on a IPS LCD or IGZO 9 pixels would look like that

RGB RGB RGB
RGB RGB RGB
RGB RGB RGB

count the red, green and blue subpixels and you'll see why Sony's "4k panel" is actually the first true 1080p OLED display.

Some uneducated people think that the higher resolution would images SHARPER.
Have they ever seen a 5k Mac Pro display? Does anything in the world look sharp on it? No, it looks realistically smooth, and that's what images look like on XZ Premium's 4K screen, and that's what they're looking like on the X1, and that's what they're going to look like on the X1mii, not SHARP, but SMOOTH, because at higher resolution the image doesn't have to downscale so much, and you can't single a pixel out like on Samsung's 1440p screens which are actually 720p in BLUE and RED colors.

Ever read footnotes in ads? You should. It reads that on OLED screens the screen definition is calculated by only Green subpixels.

Study math, gentlemen.

    Smithravi, 29 May 2020Finally apart from me and some Japanese people, a mainstrea... moreMan, I really missed out on that feature! Thanks for sharing this.
    That means, this 4000mAh battery will barely be degraded even after 10 years of use if the user constantly keeps on using this feature, just wow!

    And to think that Game Enhancer is actually customizable, in a sense that you could even use it for non-gaming apps, such as YouTube, Facebook, Google Chrome, etc.
    Means when at home, I can simply plug in my phone all day and not even waste a single drop of percentage from my main battery. Wow what a crazy idea to maximize my battery to its full potential!

    Let's see who's gonna be first to copy this idea and claim it to be the world's first. Lol.

      Smithravi, 29 May 2020Finally apart from me and some Japanese people, a mainstrea... moreThank you very much for this amazing information, it really amazes me how Sony create amazing thinks every time then they don't declare it as if it is not worth it, i am using the very old Xperia game enhancer on my xperia x and it has amazing potential on gaming, can't imagine the potential of this new ones.

        Finally apart from me and some Japanese people, a mainstream guy talks about HS power control.

        https://www.xda-developers.com/sony-xperia-1-ii-gaming-feature-charge-and-play-without-degrading-battery-health-h-s-power-control/

        It very sad, sony is not marketing this like they are doing it for camera. And all of sudden Samsung/Chinese company will copy and release this feature in future models and get the credit. As usual same story since decade.

          Anonymous, 28 May 2020Is the Sony Xperia 1 ii overpriced? I guess it will depend.... moreI aint gonna change my mind this is gonna be my next device...the only thing I will softly bitch about is the colour, I always opt for White, but purple will be nice for a change, and yes I intend to keep it for at least 4-5 years when the battery degrades then I'll switch, worths every penny for it !!!

            Ultimate Reviewer, 29 May 2020Bro what? Do you even know what you're talking about? Human... moreThe deference between 4K and QHD is way bigger than between QHD and FHD, and i bet you been defending somewhere claiming QHD is much better than FHD.
            I don't know why this debate comes out this way everytime, the real comparison should be between 4K and FHD in the first place, both popular real used resolutions in most all contents, if u can't distinguish between 4K and FHD then this is a deferent type of problems.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • gCm
              • 29 May 2020

              Anonymous, 29 May 2020I believe the person that you a replying to is just trying ... morebecause you know, according to those people, sony never invented s***, never innovates unlike their beloved company

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • gCm
                • 29 May 2020

                Ultimate Reviewer, 29 May 2020I don't think you understand how resolution works. Like I s... morehttps://www.gsmarena.com/sharp_aquos_zero_2-10259.php
                240hz

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • pGj
                  • 29 May 2020

                  Exyvia, 29 May 2020Tann Hauser replied to my comment. I'm guessing you bot... moreI agree and understand your comment, no you don't buy a phone solely on a screen, on the other hand you don't not buy a phone solely on the screen either.
                  I am more interested in the photography side, but I do want the ability to review the photos on the screen before getting home. And with a 4k screen the details will be clearer.
                  The phone has its downsides as well and is not the perfect phone but it is what comes closest for my needs. What I have been saying all along is that it isn't the right choice for most people but that doesn't make it bad. People have trouble understanding that for some reason

                    Anonymous, 29 May 2020I believe the person that you a replying to is just trying ... moreTann Hauser replied to my comment.

                    I'm guessing you both didn't understand my comment.

                    I stated 'some people can discern this difference on a phone, the people who are adapt at looking at high dpi images' which means yes, there are people who can notice the difference.

                    Anyways, you don't buy phone cause has a 4k panel same reason you don't buy a phone with 120hz. You're buying a phone not a screen. Look at the other specs and software. If you're not using 3.5mm jack or photo pro, you're paying for extra features you're not using.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • pGj
                      • 29 May 2020

                      Tann Hauser, 29 May 2020There is so much more to this phone than just 4K screen. A... moreI believe the person that you a replying to is just trying to convince himself that 4k is not visible as he will obviously not buy this phone and needs to think that he is not missing out on anything.
                      The truth is if you play a side by side comparison between 4k and hd (there are plenty on you tube) you can easily tell a difference. And that is on half the screen. But to do this you must have a 4k screen to begin with. I'm sure when he upgrades to a 4k screen he will not want to go back to hd.
                      We all know that if it was Sony with hd and all other brands 4k that the comments on here would be that Sony doesn't even have 4k which is a necessity in 2020. Sad really

                        Exyvia, 29 May 2020Yes buying a phone solely on the 4k screen is laughable but... moreThere is so much more to this phone than just 4K screen.
                        And I beg to differ, 20/20 vision(380 ppi level) is just a standardised testing level for optic aid assesment. Most people have better vision than that, and can certainly discern 4K res on a 6,5 inch screen 40 cm away, as the viewing angle is the same as some 65 inch TV 4 meters away. Its simple math.

                          Smithravi, 28 May 2020Actual picture taken by DPR, https://www.dpreview.com/s... moreSonys processing doesnt need work, its HDR processing is on point, not overdoing the shadow extrapolation too much as to look unnatural. The shot would come out the same or even better than the one managed in lightroom, IF the guy behind the camera had used HDR option under P mode for that scene.
                          I am preplexed how the DP photographer "doesnt know" where HDR and DRO options are, just like in the same mirrorless standalone cam UI, he must have reviewed so many mirrorless Alpha cameras so far, that behave in the same way. I would expect that low level of knowledge from trend reviewers like cNet, DxO, etc, but not from professional grade cam rewiewers.
                          J Bagnell noticed that behaviour too.

                          But DP is obviously gonna, as usually, review the camera just as another smartphone app, using only apps auto, expecting autoHDR on out of the box, that Mirorrless DSLRs dont use either. And then of course complain about DR.

                          Same story with Xperia cam reviews every year.

                            Ultimate Reviewer, 29 May 2020My point for making these comments is to advise people agai... moreYes buying a phone solely on the 4k screen is laughable but people have different vision - some people can discern this difference on a phone, the people who are adapt at looking at high dpi images.

                            You're assuming this phone is for the average user, to which, I'd recommend a different phone as they'll be paying for film and photo pro which they probably won't use, hence all the people whinging about the price.

                              • L
                              • LWI 888
                              • vae
                              • 29 May 2020

                              Ultimate Reviewer, 29 May 2020Bro what? Do you even know what you're talking about? Human... moreMy friend, I wish I had you in the store with me when I bought 2 successive 4k-screen Xperias in a row (XZ Premium, then Sony 1)! You're 100% correct! It's negligible to the naked human eye & all it does is deplete the battery capacity faster. Don't worry what the others say about your comments. You buy wisely & they DON'T!

                                Anonymous, 29 May 2020It's your opinion and that's ok. Then just don't buy the so... moreMy point for making these comments is to advise people against blindly buying this phone simply because they see that 4k resolution spec. YOU WON'T NOTICE A DIFFERENCE. The difference between phone screens and TVs screens are gigantic. With such a big display you need 4k to get an accurate detailed image. While 4k isn't necessary on such a small screen.

                                  Dante101, 29 May 2020Actually, human weren't mean to see any difference between ... moreBro what? Do you even know what you're talking about? Humans' eyes simply can't see the difference between 4k and 1440p on such small screens. That's the point I am making. I don't know what nonsensical garbage you're spitting out, however. Ask every professional and they will tell you the same thing I just said. 4K is unnecessary on a phone screen. That's why Samsung doesn't include it in their devices. They rather focus on color accuracy, brightness, and refresh rate over some gimmick that no one will be able to take advantage of.

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • 37a
                                    • 29 May 2020

                                    Ultimate Reviewer, 29 May 2020Again even if the Galaxy s20 ultra caps out at 1080p when y... moreIt's your opinion and that's ok. Then just don't buy the sony if refresh rate is what concerns you more. I don't know what you want to gain by making these comments. If someone wants the high resolution just let him be.

                                    Speaking for myself, I don't really care for neither 4k or the refresh rate, coming from an HTC 10 which has 1440p at 60Hz. The only comparison for resolution difference I have here is an old Nexus 5 with 1080p Display, and at least there I can see a difference to 1440p. I will see if there is a gain with 4k when I have the xperia here.

                                    And about your comparison with a TV screen: These comparisons really don't make much sense in my opinion. The pixels are only "spread out" if you're pressing your nose on screen, but normally you (should) sit a few meters away from it. And then a TV screen isn't that much bigger than a phone that you're holding in your hand. So if you can see a difference between a 1080p and 4K Monitor from a few meters away I don't know why it shouldn't make at least a small difference on a phone right in front of you.

                                      Ultimate Reviewer, 29 May 2020 What are you even trying to say with your first sentence?... moreActually, human weren't mean to see any difference between 60 hz and 120 hz too because of our eyes' characteristics. But we do see the difference. Same can be said for 4k, people do see the difference.
                                      4k screen itself will reduce battery, if they added higher refresh rate too, there won't be much battery left for a full day. Maybe Sony wanted to offer something others aren't, a 4k screen rather than higher refresh rate that everyone is doing.

                                        Anonymous, 29 May 2020I really don't get the thing about the high refresh rate. I... moreAgain even if the Galaxy s20 ultra caps out at 1080p when you go 120fps. YOU STILL WONT SEE A DIFFERENCE. This is due to just how small a phone screen is. 4k only matters on big flatscreens TV's. Where the pixels are so spread out having 4k can make a significant difference. Also the OnePlus 8 Pro provides 1440p at 120fps while retaining decent battery life.

                                          74 of 192