Sony Xperia 1 III MORE PICTURES

Sony Xperia 1 III

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

Seeing how bad charging time was on the Xperia 10 III (different beast, I know) I do hope it goes differently with the 1 III and 5 III.

(can't afford it but hey a man can dream)

    TheLegitTechy247365, 15 Jun 2021I'm so glad Xperia 1iii is out in US 🥰 I'll be bu... moreDude, your trolling is a bit off and obvious. Try a bit harder at least. ;)

      I'm so glad Xperia 1iii is out in US 🥰 I'll be buying the phone tomorrow 😁 Can't wait to have 4k 144hz in the palm of my hand!

        TheGoldenMellifluous, 15 Jun 2021https://amp.scmp.com/lifestyle/gadgets/article/3137236/sony... moreBut there isn't anything about endurance rating , that's what we want to know to compare it to other flagships

          TheGoldenMellifluous, 15 Jun 2021https://amp.scmp.com/lifestyle/gadgets/article/3137236/sony... moreTruly appreciate it and it's...kind of what I feared...

          Don't know what to do... probably going to wait for the ROG phone 5 Pro. I'll have to sacrifice the water-resistance, mmWave, and worst of all, expanded memory (got my 400GB MicroSD card from black Friday for nothing) but if it means a better battery life, so be it.

            Dometalican, 11 Jun 2021No battery life results. Stopped being interested. Sorry.https://amp.scmp.com/lifestyle/gadgets/article/3137236/sony-xperia-1-iii-review-4k-120hz-oled-screen-camera-shutter
            .
            The Xperia 1 III review from Ben Sin of South China Morning Post is out (the outline is clear), Dometalican, and it has the battery life described there by the reviewers as you wanted. But you need to sign in via Google to read the review to the battery life section.

              • A
              • ASJ1901
              • my0
              • 15 Jun 2021

              Anonymous, 15 Jun 2021Not the ones I have seen they said that they were different... moreI agree on that part as well. Not everyone likes the same thing. I have a pixel 4a for the time being which i am planning to replace with xperia 1 iii. I don't like the night mode shots, specially when a person is in the frame. It oversharpens them and the person end up looking like someone has Photoshopped them in front if a scene. But, other people might like such a look, i am not to judge them. And i agree with all of the people in this forum saying that the reviewers should mention such things. Images are always subjective, what one person likes might not be liked by the other one. So, i believe that part of a review should be handled better. Its not just for Sony, but every

                • A
                • ASJ1901
                • my0
                • 15 Jun 2021

                ASJ1901, 15 Jun 2021I agree on that part. Most reviewers end up mostly evaluati... moreThe 4k screen

                  • A
                  • ASJ1901
                  • my0
                  • 15 Jun 2021

                  KING DRANZER, 15 Jun 2021Yes but they should be saying that learning curve is hard i... moreI agree on that part. Most reviewers end up mostly evaluating just the Auto mode, so everything about the learning curve goes out the window. And thats what i meant earlier when i said they do this bcoz most people just want a point, shoot and forget phone shooter. To them, Sony seems behind on such scenarios. Again, its not my view. But i get why they do that. But, what they mostly forget is normal people dont really care about the things they do bcoz normal people dont and cant compare phones side by side, unlike them and most people click photos to share, which again, all the commonly used platforms compress the images further.l, so it doesn't really matter. The rest of the phone is pretty good for the price and mostly adheres to the current flagship standard, with some extras like the

                    4k 144hz, 2000nit brightness, insane cooling (Lukewarm at ultra settings on full brightness), sd card slot, headphone jack, 6000mah battery, highest mp in a main camera yet. I might get the purple myself. Never owned a purple phone before. I'm glad it's only $1,050usd

                      Much has been written here about photo quality and comparisons. And I understand one simple thing: users cannot accept that their vision may not coincide with the vision of the manufacturer.
                      And I really feel that users, even the most sophisticated ones, have a very poor understanding of how digital photography works.

                      We have JPG 8 bit. We have a scene, for example 24 stops. We can push all 24 stops (gluing) into 8 bits, or select a certain piece from DR and use only it. In the first case, we will get a photo without details at all, but with wide DR. In the second we can get a photo with more contrast and details, but with narrower DR. Each manufacturer decides for itself the size of DR piece that will be used in JPG. And what post processing will be thrown on top. Nobody is obliged to do what some undefined user wants.

                      Is it that hard or complicated to understand?

                      Next. Each sensor has its own specific DR, beyond which it cannot physically step over. The solution was found by Google, which came up with not just gluing, but RAW gluing. And even in this case this gluing algorythm isn't to bite off a bigger piece it can chew. All because every knowledgeable manufacturer understands that when expanding the DR, you have to sacrifice details, contrast and clarity of the picture.

                      And on the one hand, there are users who are already accustomed to the dumb HDR, who do not care about anything, as long as the average picture has a maximum of color spots. And on the other hand, we have Sony, who have always and everywhere tried to work within certain standards. And 8 bits, if you go deeper into the topic, suggest a maximum of 7-9 stops to preserve detail and correct adequate contrast. Previously, only 6 stops were allotted for 8 bits. Today, the initial balance has already been violated and the permissible DR has been brought to 9 stops. But it is not enough for users, many manufacturers have gone further and are trying to shove 11 stops in JPG.
                      Why do lovers of this over-HDR think that Sony is obliged to do as they like, and not as others (like me) prefer?

                      About Nokia users with 16-bit sensors for example. It seems to be all looking great and all, while DR is a bit lacking. But it should be just about photo? Why shouldn't I want to enjoy the video? Nokia on video is far from modern flagships and looks very bleak compared to them. But the users of this brand confidently tell how well the camera takes pictures and ignore video quality.

                      I urge to evaluate the camera more adequately. It may be worthwhile to somehow indicate what is important to you, and why you like or dislike the camera. But you should always remember that the manufacturer does not have to adapt to you.


                      I personally like how Sony processes the photo, forcing the user to think at least a little bit about what he is shooting and what he wants to display in this photo. The user is forced to highlight accents. With HDR users just shoot everything with the same method and photos look boring and plastic. Therefore, I choose Sony, and who needs DR can choose from 1+, Samsung, new Apple and other Chinese.


                      P.S. I forgot to write that the better the sensor for the photo, the worse it is for the video. A photo does not require such a load to process a photo; to process the same DR, the same bit rate and the same matrix resolution in a video requires tens of times more resources. Therefore, manufacturers are looking for a balance. Someone gives priority to photos, someone tries to leave something for the video.

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • Ni0
                        • 15 Jun 2021

                        Anonymous, 15 Jun 2021Not the ones I have seen they said that they were different... moreLol why compare it to iPhone 12?
                        It's not even close to being the best Camera.
                        Flagships from Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Oppo are way better than what Sony has to offer

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • n07
                          • 15 Jun 2021

                          Anonymous, 15 Jun 2021Those tech Reviewers when given other smartphones said thos... moreNot the ones I have seen they said that they were different and the Sony was harder to use but I don't recall a general better being mentioned either way. Try the James lavish comparison with the iphone12 for example. A very clear example of oversharpening and computational imaging Vs traditional photography.

                            ASJ1901, 15 Jun 2021That might be true, but in their defense they mainly do rev... moreYes but they should be saying that learning curve is hard instead of outright calling it to be bad. Which it is not. There are few reviewers who do that. Sadly majority of well known famous reviewers with huge following don't do that. What they should be saying is that learning curve is steep and for people who don't want to go through settings it is not suitable. Which we understand and can accept. But outright calling it to be inferior or not good is not correct at all.

                              • A
                              • ASJ1901
                              • my0
                              • 15 Jun 2021

                              KING DRANZER, 15 Jun 2021Let me put this in a simple way. XPERIA 1 III camera can do... moreThat might be true, but in their defense they mainly do reviews for common people and most common folk dont like to make manual adjustments to click everyday photos. Something easy like pixel or iphone camera is always a good option for most people. Though, most common folk wont notice the difference between a Samsung or a sony or an apple clicked image either. So, in the end it doesn't really matter, does it. For most people, they want to click to upload on social media and if MKBHDs blind test is anything to go by, the best point and shoot doesn't win that ever. It clearly shows what is more important to normal people who don't have multiple flagships to compare things side by side

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • 3yZ
                                • 15 Jun 2021

                                KING DRANZER, 15 Jun 2021Let me put this in a simple way. XPERIA 1 III camera can do... moreKeep drinking the Xperia Kool aid

                                  I think that all those reviewers are biased by one side or the other and I'm pretty sure that 100% of them are. You look at one review and it will say to you that let's say camera is great and on another channel it will say it's bad and so on every aspect. In the end, we should all understand that the flagships have pretty much the same hardware configuration and even the software is largely the same with some small overlays. The difference in price is made by the build materials like the kind of glass and maybe the display although those are also pretty much the same in the flagship area and camera optimisation. So, in the end we will end up paying for the name especially. If Sony Xperia 1 III would sell under a lesser name but exactly the same phone, it would cost 300 Euros less without question. Too bad I just love Sony and my house is packed with their overpriced products.
                                  So, my advice, just buy what brand you trust and like, anyway almost all are made in China with few exceptions.

                                    Anonymous, 15 Jun 2021Those tech Reviewers when given other smartphones said thos... moreLet me put this in a simple way. XPERIA 1 III camera can do almost everything other Flagships can. But the other Flagships cannot do what XPERIA 1 III camera is capable of. But to that XPERIA 1 III needs bit adjustment in the settings. But that is what reviewers don't like. Hence that call it to be bad. Reviewers are lazy.

                                      Anonymous, 14 Jun 2021The Xperia 1 ii also lagged behind when a non photographer ... moreWhat can I tell you.i have 3 sony phones before samsung.only one thing for me was bad-interface.but overall it's better than samsung.no overheatings,lags updates.camera is good compared to samsungs its a little better in my opinion

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • ntJ
                                        • 15 Jun 2021

                                        Anonymous, 14 Jun 2021The Xperia 1 ii also lagged behind when a non photographer ... moreThose tech Reviewers when given other smartphones said those were better than Xperia

                                          54 of 115