Sony Xperia X Performance
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 08 May 2016
AnonD-331984, 08 May 2016The painful truth with you is that if samsung is not winnin... moreThe test was pure garbage and inaccurate.
Their was a few times where his finger did not touch both screens at the same time.
Like i said phonebuff style is the only real speed test.
I could not care less about SD820 S7.
Its not available in my country making it irrelevent to me.
We get the superior Exynos.
Show me a phonebuff style speed test where SD820 beats Exynos or iPhone.
Dont bother providing garbage test like the one you just provided.
Im waiting.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 08 May 2016
Anonymous, 08 May 2016820 is ahead of all SoCs in proper CPU benchmarks. Benchmar... moreBenchmarks mean nothing.
- D
- AnonD-331984
- 2SC
- 08 May 2016
Anonymous, 08 May 2016Another useless speed test.
Didn't bother watching after... moreThe painful truth with you is that if samsung is not winning overall then it's not an ideal speed test. I gave you a phonebuff test that proved that samsung cannot optimize snapdragon but your reply was "Oh no, it's not Exynos S7". Now I gave you an Exynos test and you reply now is "Oh no, it's not phonebuff test". LOOOL! There's no winning with you, unfortunately there's nothing to win here.
The thing is you're thinking I'm doing this to win some argument, you are wrong. I'm just correcting you to the fact that there is no proof that Exynos is superior.
(WHICH IS VERY MUCH PLAUSIBLE IF SAMSUNG INTENTIONALLY CRIPPLED SD820 TO PROVE A POINT AND BOOST EXYNOS SALES. Yeah I'm serious, that company is scary as shit. Have you seen what they're been sued for? I mean these guys have a weapon's department, there is no limit to their sabotage.)
It's all about optimization but to U it's Exynox will humiliate SD, oh S7 will humiliate X performance.
Face it, no one is a champ at everything and samsung's drawback? OPTIMIZATION.
- D
- AnonD-481725
- StN
- 08 May 2016
AnonD-331984, 08 May 2016Not trying to drag the issue but I see no humiliation here.... moreSorry but this is stupid with my respects, first of all there is no more slow phones, phones speed are almost similar, i just can't believe that many people still believe in this test booting up the phone then opening and closing applications, and if there is a difference it seems to be just 0.2 second and offcourse this is not because of hardware, because all cpu's become superb from qualcomm 805 till 820, the real difference here is the power consumption, although some of them are much powerful from others but maybe the lowest one can give 100% performance.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 08 May 2016
Anonymous, 08 May 2016Yet SD820 got smoked.820 is ahead of all SoCs in proper CPU benchmarks. Benchmarks are the tools to measure and rank performance
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 08 May 2016
AnonD-331984, 08 May 2016Not trying to drag the issue but I see no humiliation here.... moreAnother useless speed test.
Didn't bother watching after a minute.
Like i said before show me a phonebuff style speedtest. (Opening several apps one after the another)
Not speed test like this where they only open 1 app at a time.
- D
- AnonD-331984
- 2SC
- 08 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016I see you watched the video and new resort to speculations.... moreNot trying to drag the issue but I see no humiliation here...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PhWfTkJiug
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 08 May 2016
Anonymous, 07 May 2016Shame is inferior to Qualcomm in quality and speed tests, j... moreYet SD820 got smoked.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 07 May 2016
AnonD-434597, 07 May 2016-Apple has well optimized software.
- Sammy? With higher r... moreYou have no idea at all it seems. Sony software are well known for optimization. Android central made a short review of thr Z3 running Beta Marshmallow, and the reviewer told the phone was very fast and one of the fastest he used, well optimized.
Z5 is a different story. Snapdragon 810 isnt a stable platform. Which is the reason why Sony never uses it for Beta testing . another laggy Sony phone is M4 Aqua, once again using a crappy Snapdragon. You are blaming sony because you are a hater. haters remain haters.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 07 May 2016
AnonD-434597, 07 May 2016-Apple has well optimized software.
- Sammy? With higher r... morePlease stop your usual sony garbage. You are one hardcore troller found in every Sony page.
If you can read, i was comparing the Exynos S7 and Snapdragon S7 and optimization. No one was talking about Sony here. What you tell about Sony is just what all trolls say.
- m
- mader_fukker..
- 7Xd
- 07 May 2016
better make it 5.3 inches screen size.
a bigger battery.
those spaces for putting a strap on phone is best.so that it will not slip on hand and fall.
water resistant is also best.dual sim is great for phones.radio.
expandable storage.
does this phone sucks at temperature issues?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 6XU
- 07 May 2016
Sony phones are well optimised. My Z3 works smooth like butter. And it is 2014 phone.
- D
- AnonD-434597
- tDx
- 07 May 2016
Anonymous, 07 May 2016Why do you think iPhone has top place? Not because of the ... more-Apple has well optimized software.
- Sammy? With higher resolution QHD screen Touchwiz is heavier ui. It many additional sensors n software that always standby, like hall sensor moist sensors etc. But it still fastest than other android flagship bcause of 'Good optimisation'.
- Its only sony who has bad optimisation, or they even have no idea about 'optimisation'. For ex. Even more powerful SoC S810 lower res screen and lightest UI, it still beaten by QHD phone with SD808 soc.
https://youtu.be/-wne8m9qCFs
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 07 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Phonebuff speed test
Exynos s7 is the 2nd fastest after ... moreWhy do you think iPhone has top place? Not because of the processor. Its all because of the well optimized software.
Looks like Sammy didnt well optimize the software for SD820.
Benchmarks measure only the power of the processor. In this case 820 is more powerful. But real life performance depends on software and optimization.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 07 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Phonebuff speed test Exynos s7 is the 2nd fastest after ... moreBut you can't tell that 8890 is faster than SD820. They have to properly optimize the software
- ?
- Anonymous
- Ibx
- 07 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Phonebuff speed test Exynos s7 is the 2nd fastest after ... moreShame is inferior to Qualcomm in quality and speed tests, just like there product mfg durability, period.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016I would love to know where you got the wrong information th... morePhonebuff speed test
Exynos s7 is the 2nd fastest after iPhone 6s
I dont care about benchmark test, they mean nothing to me.
Phonebuff style speed test are the only speedtest that matter in the real world
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 06 May 2016
AnonD-434597, 06 May 2016XP is only thicker 0,5mm than z2. While Z2 is 3mm wider ... moreThe battery of the Z2 doesnt take the whole space. Look at the teardown pics. Battery doesnt even take half the the space
- D
- AnonD-434597
- tDD
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016To be honest.
None of these seem like legit reasons for ... moreThis is the reason for smaller battery.
You know glass is fragile, especially for waterproof phone. So its better to replace it with plastic like glass(Z5), and why not metal..??
So they made the xperiment, replacing Z5 glass back with metal. It doesnt work. Z5 frame is metal, changing the glass back with metal, mean it will be full metal unibody design. It doesnt work. Metal blocks signal. Cutting the top and bottom metal back for antenna(like iphone 5) will betray omnibalance design.
So they needed phone with plastic construction. M4 Aqua. Imagine you replace M4 aqua glass back with metal, it will look exactly like X Performance right?? And it works. and m4 aqua is smaller than Z series, so they cant put 3000mah battery into it. 2700mah is the best they can do..
- D
- AnonD-434597
- tDD
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Maybe because to reduce heat? Or because of qnovo battery t... moreNo, Its because M5 is smaller, qnovo tech has nothing to do with battery capacity. Bigger battery is always better.
If with 2700 mah XP has the same or longer battery life than s7. sure, sony wants to put 3200mah battery so it will absolutely win.
They just cant, bcz XP is smaller. And they just cant make it 9-10mm thick, no it too thick. 8,7 is maximum.