Sony Xperia X Performance
- J
- Justaperv
- 615
- 06 May 2016
I'm a SONY fan but honestly, I expect MORE from SONY this time...!
We all know that SONY image is "premium" since old times, but I didn't get the premium feeling from this gadget because of the lower spec and all, no new innovation, there is absolutely no "wow" factor, and nothing to get me excited on this one.
Wake up SONY!! You get your approach wrong to cut production cost. Cheaper thing from you won't sell, but GREAT things will...
I think you have too many smartphone models, just concentrate to build a few model full with innovation and superior quality than build many with un-innovative and less useful features. Wow factor is number one in sales, please make us excited once more... -_-
- g
- gaaron
- w0Q
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Probably one of the most pathetic explanations to why a pho... moreLol I didn't expect you'll tke it seriousl. Samy boy...
- D
- AnonD-434597
- tDD
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Xperia Z2 is only a little wider and taller. Not a huge dif... moreXP is only thicker 0,5mm than z2.
While Z2 is 3mm wider and 3mm taller. Huge enough for 500mah?
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016iPhone 5 or 5s. Whichever was released closest to Z and ... moreWe can add iPhone 4 and 4s into the mix since they were that good.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016What iPhone are we talking about? Not all have good build q... moreiPhone 5 or 5s.
Whichever was released closest to Z and Z1.
i dont recall iPhones not having good build quality since the 3Gs in 2009. (5c was decent)
But thats irrelevant because almost every phone back then was plastic with crap build quality.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016You're wrong. Build quality is different from materials use... moreWhat iPhone are we talking about? Not all have good build quality.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016I see you watched the video and new resort to speculations.... moreI would love to know where you got the wrong information that exynos 8890 can humiliate snapdragon 820.
Ive seen comparisons, Out of 9 benchmarks, 6 were won by 820, while 8890 won in web browsing only.
And finally higher antutu score with the 820 (139,000 vs 130,000)
In short 820 is ahead, no way is 8890 more superior.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Tann Hauser, 04 May 2016You realy are a lame troll loser you know...
its 1.5 yea... moreAll SD820 powered phones got smoked in that speed test. Get it?
iPhone smokes all period. Next excuse. Get that?
Xperia is not for comparison with these beast as Sony has become a joke. Get it?
You're post is pure crap and only proves what a lame loser you are.
- g
- gringo
- gux
- 06 May 2016
Final word about 2016 :
Xiaomi and HTC rocks !
Samsung and Sony sucks !!!
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016You're wrong. Build quality is different from materials use... moreYou're wrong. Build quality is different from materials used. Just because a phone is made of plastic doesnt mean it has cheap build quality.
No, im right. Build quality simply was not that good. It does not come close to iPhone or Z1.
For example, Galaxy S5 was plastic. But it had good build quality.
-You have low expectations if you think S5 has good biuld quality.
iPhone 5c and some lumias are the only plastic phones that didn't feel cheap and nasty.
So just because a phone is plastic doesnt mean its cheaply built.
And in the case of Z, ONLY frame was plastic
-You do have a point, as i have stated some plastic phones that feel decent.
But the original Z is not one of them.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016To be honest. None of these seem like legit reasons for ... moreXperia Z2 is only a little wider and taller. Not a huge difference to slim down the battery by 500mAh. Obviously some other reason
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
AnonD-331984, 04 May 2016I see you watched the video and new resort to speculations.... moreI see you watched the video and new resort to speculations. Then who am I not to speculate that the almighty X performance will not humiliate the S7.
-Nope, Exynos S7 will humiliate X Performance plus any other SD820 phone period. I could not care less about the SD powered S7 as its not even available in my country. We're luck to get the superior Exynos variant.
An before you comment I advice you should see how far the Z5 goes...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7ffHwOnO7o
Spoiler! it goes a looooong way
-LOL. The speed test shown in the video you have provided is a complete joke.
Compared against 1+ year old s6.
Give me phonebuff style speed test any day as these are the only speed test that mean anything.
You did say sony's lightweight will do nothing, I seriously doubt that. You know what my guy, pray, I mean pray real hard because G5 already owns SD S7.
-Yep absolutely, Sonys lightweight will do nothing. LG has far software than Sony nowadays. As said before G5 aint beating Exynos S7.
Anyways, cant wait for the speed test on X Performance. (Oh wait Phonebuff doesnt bother with Sony)LOL
By the time this phone is released, note 6 and iPhone 7 will be on the horizon.
X Performance will be humiliated.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Xperia Z, did not even come close to iPhone in build qualit... moreYou're wrong. Build quality is different from materials used. Just because a phone is made of plastic doesnt mean it has cheap build quality.
For example, Galaxy S5 was plastic. But it had good build quality.
So just because a phone is plastic doesnt mean its cheaply built.
And in the case of Z, ONLY frame was plastic
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 04 May 2016Nah, Xperia Z came before the M7 and it was the first to co... moreXperia Z, did not even come close to iPhone in build quality.
There was no steel frame like in the Z1. It only had glass back.
If you even held a Z, you will know it feels like a plastic brick.
Z1 on the hand is premium, with smoothed out edges.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Maybe because to reduce heat? Or because of qnovo battery t... moreTo be honest.
None of these seem like legit reasons for smaller battery.
Except for Z2 being taller, wider.
- D
- AnonD-434597
- tDx
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016S6 was 6.8 mm thin including large camera bump. Xperform... moreSimple, Z2 is wider and taller.
- ?
- Anonymous
- d%t
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016S6 was 6.8 mm thin including large camera bump.
Xperform... moreMaybe because to reduce heat? Or because of qnovo battery tech? Let them review the XP.
Another explanation maybe Sony doesnt want it to be as sleek and premium as the Z5.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Probably one of the most pathetic explanations to why a pho... more1500 mah battery for your safety.
For some reason my comment got cut off.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
gaaron, 05 May 2016Because the More battery capacity the bigger explosions it ... moreProbably one of the most pathetic explanations to why a phone should not have large battery capacity.
Seriously if you think this garbage has any truth, just use an iPhone 4 with a
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 06 May 2016
Anonymous, 06 May 2016Last year's S6 had even smaller 2500 mAh battery.
But when... moreS6 was 6.8 mm thin including large camera bump.
Xperformance 8.7 mm thick with flat back.
There is no legitimate reason for Sony to put such a small battery into XPerformance.
To put this into perspective Xperia Z2 was 8.2 mm with 3200 mah.
Why thicker phone with 500 mah less? Why? Just why?