Tecno Camon 19 Pro review
HiOS 8.6 on top of Android 12
The Camon 19 Pro runs on the latest Android 12 with Tecno's in-house HiOS 8.6 on top. Tecno has been running and refining its own skin for some time now, which we've generally found to be quite good in the past, with a few on and off caveats here and there. These mostly come down to pre-installed bloat and ads. But, credit, where credit is due, the situation on both fronts appears to have gotten a lot better. The Camon 19 didn't annoy us with pesky notifications and pushy offers nearly as much as some of its predecessors. The experience is actually pretty clean.
That's not to say there isn't a whole bunch of pre-installed apps and utilities. Tecno is still sticking to its traditions of developing and deploying its own set of apps to cover the basic features. You get an in-house gallery and video player and an app store, even two depending on how you count them. These can still get annoying at times, but we can understand the angle Tecno is coming from.
Hi Browser • AI Gallery • AI Gallery • Phone Master • AHA Games • Palm Store
If some of the third-party apps are bothering you with various notifications - you can disable those - either from within the annoying app or from the Notification settings.
Getting into the Camon 19 Pro is business as usual, with both fingerprint and face recognition available. You can have the fingerprint reader unlock with just a tap or require a press as well, and you can do that for face recognition as well.
Since the Camon 19 Pro has an LCD instead of an OLED, the always-on display feature and its customization options are absent.
The lockscreen has a single shortcut in the bottom right to access the camera. Once you're past that, you arrive at a standard homescreen interface. The leftmost pane, called the Zero screen, holds cards with suggested news, weather and quotes widgets and an app usage widget. You can disable the Zero screen in the 'Desktop settings'. There's an app drawer by default which you can access from the old-school A-Z orange icon at the bottom or with an upward swipe from the bottom.
Lockscreen • Homescreen • Zero screen • Folder view • App drawer • Task switcher
Themes are available as part of HiOS, and there is a dedicated Theme store for this purpose.
Tecno has a long-standing selection of advanced features that generally get carried forward from older models. All of the custom bits from the Camon 16, 17 and 18 families are still present here. That includes the Game mode with all the settings, statistics and parental controls. There is also a Smart panel with slide-from-the-side shortcuts.
Social Turbo toolset is rather interesting (a WhatsApp enhancer of sorts) - it can change your voice, enhance your face during video calls, record your WhatsApp calls, and allow you to read messages without marking them as Read.
MemFusion is a new addition to the features list. It's just Tecno's came for virtual RAM. The Camon 19 Pro has 8GB of physical RAM chips on board and can extend that up to a total of 13GB with another 5GB of virtual memory.
The CarIcare aftersales assistance utility is also onboard, and you can fire it anytime if you encounter problems with your phone.
If you want even more details about the HiOS, you can learn more in the software section of the Camon 16 Premier review. All the extra features outlined there are still present and relevant.
Special function menu • Game mode • Social Turbo • CarIcare • Smart Panel
Performance and benchmarks
The Camon 19 uses the MediaTek Helio G96 chipset just like the Camon 18 Premier. It is fabricated on the 12nm FinFET manufacturing process from TSMC, just like the previous G9x chips.
The Helio G96 has the same octa-core CPU as the Helio G90, G90T (Camon 16 Premier) and G95 (Camon 17 Pro) - it packs two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores ticking at 2.05GHz and six energy-efficient Corext-A55 cores working at 2.0GHz.
The G96 has a GPU from the Valhalla generation by ARM - the Mali-G57. Unlike the previous G9x chips, here we have a dual-core configuration instead of a quad-core, so a drop in GPU numbers is expected compared to some of those older chips. The new GPU does, however, bring about support for 120Hz refresh rate, which the Camon 19 makes great use of with high refresh rate gaming, so we can't complain too much about the core count downgrade.
The Camon 19 Pro is available in two memory configurations - 8GB RAM plus 128GB storage and 8GB RAM plus 256GB storage. We have the smaller of the two for this review.
Let's kick things off with some CPU testing and GeekBench. The Camon 19 Pro and its Helio G96 chipset find themselves nicely in line with what we've come to expect from the G96 chip. No surprises there, which means Techo has done a good job in software.
GeekBench 5 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
2796 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
2063 -
Realme 9 Pro
2020 -
Realme 8i
1886 -
Poco M4 Pro
1836 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
1800 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
1797 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
1780 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
1758 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
1734 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
1729 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
1719 -
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
1673 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
1672 -
Tecno Phantom X
1670 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
1668 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1662 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
1632 -
Realme 9
1601 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
1599 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
1277 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
889 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
588
GeekBench 5 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Realme 9 Pro
694 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
688 -
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
603 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
597 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
569 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
560 -
Realme 8i
539 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
534 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
532 -
Poco M4 Pro
523 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
520 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
514 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
512 -
Tecno Phantom X
512 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
511 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
511 -
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
505 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
380 -
Realme 9
380 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
376 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
361 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
179 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
153
Generally speaking, the Helio G96 does better in an all-core multi-threaded scenario coming within a stone's throw to chips like the MediaTek Dimensity 810 and the Snapdragon 732G and even beating the Dimensity 7xx line.
Its single-core capabilities are less impressive, but it still finds itself smack in the middle of the pack of competing devices, which is good to see.
AnTuTu and its much more compound benchmarking set is even more favorable towards the Camon 19 Pro as a whole. Mind you, AnTuTu takes into account things like storage and its performance as well for a much broader UX picture.
AnTuTu 9
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
504424 -
Realme 9 Pro
401894 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
382902 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
353663 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
348546 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
346389 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
343527 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
319093 -
Poco M4 Pro
318444 -
Realme 8i
308544 -
Realme 9
290097 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
273554 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
244526 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
223188 -
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
222125 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
136286 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
101299
The Camon 19 Pro still gets beat out by Snapdragon 695-equipped devices like the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G or the Realme 9 Pro. That's an ongoing trend in these rankings, so perhaps one of those would be a better fit if you are after the best possible performance for your buck. Better still, why not the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and its Snapdragon 778G, which tends to be a league above the competition in raw power.
The Camon 19 Pro retains its overall poll position in GFXBench graphic tests as well. That is to say that it's not a pack leader, but its Mali-G57 dual-core GPU still manages decent overall performance. About what we would expect from it.
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
18 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
12 -
Tecno Phantom X
12 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
12 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
11 -
Realme 9 Pro
11 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
8.4 -
Poco M4 Pro
8.3 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
8.1 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
7.9 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
5.6 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
5 -
Realme 9
5 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
4.7 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
4.6 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
3.3
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
13 -
Tecno Phantom X
7.8 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
7.8 -
Realme 9 Pro
7.8 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
7.7 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
5.7 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
5.6 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.5 -
Poco M4 Pro
5.5 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
3.7 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
3.3 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
3.2 -
Realme 9
3.2 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
3.1 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
2.2
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
19 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
12 -
Realme 9 Pro
12 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
11 -
Tecno Phantom X
11 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
10 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
7.8 -
Poco M4 Pro
7.7 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
7.5 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
7.3 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
5.3 -
Realme 9
4.9 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
4.8 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
4.6 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
4.4 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
3.4
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
14 -
Realme 9 Pro
8.2 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
8 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
7.5 -
Tecno Phantom X
7.4 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
5.3 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.1 -
Poco M4 Pro
5.1 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
5.1 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
3.5 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
3.2 -
Realme 9
3.2 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
3.1 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
2.9 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
2.3
Naturally, going down the test stack to lower the difficulty scenario, we get higher FPS numbers. Nothing even remotely in the "playable" realm in real life, but that's kind of the point of synthetic loads - they are unrealistically tough. In practice, the Camon 19 Pro handles most modern titles apart from the most demanding AAA ones with grace. Any modern mobile game engine worth its salt tends to be very accommodating to the levels of mid-range performance the Camon 19 Pro can put out.
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
28 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
17 -
Tecno Phantom X
17 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
17 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
16 -
Realme 9 Pro
16 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
15 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
13 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
12 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
12 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
12 -
Poco M4 Pro
12 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
11 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
11 -
Realme 8i
11 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
8.1 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
7.9 -
Realme 9
7.3 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
6.8 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
6.7 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
5.5 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
5.2
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
33 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
20 -
Tecno Phantom X
20 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
19 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
19 -
Realme 9 Pro
19 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
18 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
16 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
15 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
14 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
14 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
14 -
Poco M4 Pro
14 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
14 -
Realme 8i
14 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
9.3 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
9.3 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
8.3 -
Realme 9
8.2 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
8 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
6.2 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
3.5
We also remind you that fps comparisons across different devices in GFXBench are only really valid in off-screen rendering, where the native display resolution of the device does not affect the render resolution. The Camon 19 has a higher than FullHD native resolution, which is not really helping the numbers.
GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
47 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
30 -
Realme 9 Pro
29 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
28 -
Tecno Phantom X
28 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
26 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
23 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
22 -
Realme 8i
22 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
21 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
21 -
Poco M4 Pro
21 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
20 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
20 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
15 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
14 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
13 -
Realme 9
13 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
12 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
12 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
8.3
GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
56 -
Realme 9 Pro
35 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
34 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
33 -
Tecno Phantom X
33 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
30 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
26 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
25 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
24 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
24 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
24 -
Poco M4 Pro
24 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
24 -
Realme 8i
24 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
17 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
15 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
15 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
15 -
Realme 9
15 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
9.4 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
7.9
GFX Manhattan ES 3.0 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
77 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
54 -
Tecno Phantom X
54 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
49 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
47 -
Realme 9 Pro
47 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
40 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
39 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
37 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
37 -
Poco M4 Pro
37 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
37 -
Realme 8i
37 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
32 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
24 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
24 -
Realme 9
22 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
21 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
20 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
16 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
11
GFX Manhattan ES 3.0 (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
64 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
47 -
Tecno Phantom X
47 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
42 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
41 -
Realme 9 Pro
41 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
37 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
34 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
33 -
Poco M4 Pro
33 -
Realme 8i
33 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
32 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
31 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
31 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
21 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
21 -
Realme 9
20 -
Samsung Galaxy A03s
19 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
18 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
18 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
14
3DMark usually offers a more streamlined and clear-to-read performance delta, and we once again find the Camon 19 Pro smack in the middle of the pack. One observation would be that it does well for the G96 chipset that it carries. However, expectedly, that chip gets outperformed by the likes of the older Helio G95 with its four GPU cores as well as the Snapdragon 695 and 778G. No surprises there either.
3DMark SSE ES 3.1 (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
5015 -
Realme 9 Pro
2946 -
Tecno Phantom X
2733 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
2719 -
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
2638 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
2531 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
2444 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
2431 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
2391 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
1471 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
1323 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
1320 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1316 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
886
3DMark SSE Vulkan 1.0 (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
4274 -
Realme 9 Pro
2773 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
2593 -
Tecno Phantom X
2587 -
TECNO Camon 16 Premier
2577 -
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
2509 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
2399 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
2257 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
2256 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
1372 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
1371 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1267 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
1261 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
931
3DMark Wild Life Vulkan 1.1 (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
2470 -
Tecno Phantom X
1501 -
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
1498 -
Poco M4 Pro 5G
1232 -
Realme 9 Pro
1211 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
1204 -
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
1187 -
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
1185 -
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
1105 -
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
1104 -
Realme 8i
1102 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
1101 -
Infinix Note 11 Pro
1100 -
Poco M4 Pro
1099 -
Samsung Galaxy A32
686 -
Samsung Galaxy A13
510 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
482 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
439 -
Samsung Galaxy A23
429
The Camon 19 Pro makes the most out of its Helio G96 chipset. It might not be the fastest chip around, nor is it particularly current, given that we already saw it in last year's Camon 18 Premier, among many other phones, but it is still a solid and modern part that delivers plenty of performance for daily tasks and a nice set of additional features. In practice, the Camon 19 Pro feels responsive and has plenty of "oomph". The thing that is actually holding back and spoiling the fluidity of its experience is the relatively sluggish display pixel response time rather than any shortage in computing power.
Reader comments
- Anonymous
- 20 Jun 2024
- A57
What charging protocols does it support? Quick Charge is definitely there, but what about Power Delivery? Tecno Infinix, according to information, has its own fast charging protocol. Has anyone tested the charging unit with USB testers?
- RyuMikail
- 17 Apr 2024
- tA$
It's a good phone, i am honestly okay woth the camera quality and the photo, battery so much last longer (even not actually) but still better than my last phone, well it's 50:50 from my Realme 3, telephoto camera really help me in so much ...
- Anonymous
- 20 Jul 2023
- 3NE
That's not how it works. Only the maximum charge level matters. Discharging to 0% does not harm the battery. Just don't leave it completely drained for months.