Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
- b
- bilal
- KhZ
- 04 May 2012
i think samsung is not listioning to as
- A
- Artemon
- Lax
- 04 May 2012
Champion!!!
- D
- AnonD-49560
- t1}
- 04 May 2012
few things i liked about the s3. (P.S: have to say somethin positive after the criticism i did!! ;-p ) it has nfc which is really becoming mainstream nowadays and almost all recent nokia fones have nfc in them . Also the face detection unlocking feature is good so overall rating of dis fone should be:
popularity- 99%
features 9.7
perfomance-10 :-)
and design- 3 !!!
- a
- ali
- pTi
- 04 May 2012
it should compare with huawei ascend d quad!thats it
- M
- Mobilemaster
- Lax
- 04 May 2012
Lapax, 04 May 2012If you remove the "Samsung" it could surely pass ... moreIt's low-end for you maybe, but for me it looks cool. It NOT looks like a brick! :P It has round edges. I don't tell that it's the most coolest phone, but it looks pretty cool. It has awesome specs, you GET a lot of internal storage...
- K
- KushaL
- KFM
- 04 May 2012
Guyz why do you only see the outer part of the phone!!! Please Samsung Galaxy S III, Htc One X, LG Optimus 4X are similar in specs. But Samsung Galaxy S III is more featured packed compared to other two phone. See the Samsung Galaxy S III official website !!! . And dont forget Samsung Galaxy S III processor is 2 times faster than Htc's or LG's phones. You all think Samsung Galaxy S III has old GPU !!But Samsung Galaxy S III updated and more powerful Mali 400 GPU. Check this link :
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_flexes_muscles_on_benchmarks-news-4201.php
Now you can believe Samsung Galaxy S III is the best!!!! :) :P
- r
- rexton270
- nyA
- 04 May 2012
Oh dear... Another boring desing from Samsung. And plastic again!!! No innovation except HW... Stick with my Nexus Prime...
- j
- jays
- fmV
- 04 May 2012
I guess most of da disappointed r thoz wo dreamt of a "super fone with imaginary specifications n looks". Dey just hav to come bk to reality. G S2 ws poor luking comare to many others bt its screen n features made it famous. Dis one too will be da same. Da screen n features will overshadow da "look" which i do nt mind even. I will definately get it wen its out.
- J
- Jix
- p{5
- 04 May 2012
Lapax, 04 May 2012If you remove the "Samsung" it could surely pass ... moreNowadays, all high end phones are competitive and speedy with dual cores or quadcores, benchmarking hardly differs from one to another...thus what differentiate a high end phone from another is another thing...its software, build quality and materials used.
Thats what samsung did not understand..
An executive wont carry this phone it will feel too cheap..also women will not carry it cz its too big for them...and those 2 categories of buyers are large..
- l
- lol
- RId
- 04 May 2012
you ppl are damn funny. picture quality aint judging by the mp. if u want a god damn high mp , go buy sony arc s with 12mp.. lol ? look at nikon camera d700 with 12.1 mp , does this mean their quality is like sony arc s ? samsung didnt bet you guys to buy their product.. lol
about plastic , why complain ? you guys start complaining when the phone is heavy and now they made the phone light , you guys complain againt.. how stupid it is ? fyi plastic absorb shock better than metal , dont u guys study ? use your brain and common sense dude..
- p
- poster88
- 2GW
- 04 May 2012
who wants such high specs in a phone when it's too big and poor design? it's dimensions are too large to be classed as a 'phone' IMO.
- o
- om
- 3CH
- 04 May 2012
Ugly design from back side, I give 0/10
- D
- AnonD-49560
- t1}
- 04 May 2012
Deejay, 04 May 2012A Pathetic looking phone.. How can Samsung luanch a phone l... moreyeah u are right. We pay a heavy price and in return we excpect something especially from the best company in the world and we get this!!! M not complaining about the software coz its the best, its even better and smarter than the one on iphone and its an ideal smartfone but the looks are very cheap and dirty especially the curved ends!! I was so happy wen i brought my s2 but i was regretting later that i should've waited for s3. Now i am happy that i purchased the s2 and i think it was a good decision coz i can upgrade to ICS and it has the same features as that of s3 only the screen size would be smaller and the processor would be less. Samsung.......... U've let us down :-( not expected from such an awsome fone making company!! :-(
- d
- dinkydice
- P%{
- 04 May 2012
the phenomena is..the pocket huge amount of profit by heading the market..and thats an advantage of the side of media perception..tech and what not.
- m
- max-x
- PRW
- 04 May 2012
is the camera recording stereo sound or not?
- D
- AnonD-32716
- utK
- 04 May 2012
Anonymous, 23 Apr 2012still far behind the HTC ONE x, its price is also too expen... moreUse your common sense. Plastic has the ability to absorb shocks easily than metal. Even if you drop the phone and the phone and the plastic cracks (which can be easily replaced), its internals will be protected, which is not the case with phones of metal casing.
- a
- advice
- fwM
- 04 May 2012
Lapax, 04 May 2012If you remove the "Samsung" it could surely pass ... morethe majority of people had chosen the plastic of the galaxy s2 and i think the majority will choose the s3.
the only company that can compete with samsung in the next few months is apple.
- A
- Artemon
- Lax
- 04 May 2012
champion!!!
- H
- HH
- 6Q0
- 04 May 2012
no doubt from the bigining till today samsung has only given SII and note upto mark. other models to buy is the wastage of money and time.
- D
- AnonD-8067
- w9D
- 04 May 2012
poor than expectation,ram is less.camera is lesser than Nokia 808 PureView,N8,HTC Titan II(16mpx),SONY XPERIA S.....not look as htc one x.....