HTC 10 evo review: The sea dragon

The sea dragon

GSMArena team, 21 February 2017.

Performance

Here comes the scary part: the Snapdragon 810 chipset is what could turn people away from the HTC 10 evo. There's probably only one good reason to pick this chip over others - its GPU is high class. Even so, it's obviously no match for the Snapdragon 820, a chip that has appeared in several phones that are cheaper than the 10 evo.

Raw performance isn't even the main issue - its consistency is terrible. Below are the best case results we got from the phone, but keep in mind those can drop by as much as 50% after a while when the phone really heats up.

HTC 10 evo review

Single and multi-core performance isn't bad - the big Cortex-A57 cores (four of them) and the smaller A53 cores (again, four of them) still have life in them. However, technology has left this 20nm chipset behind and phones with the 14nm Snapdragon 625 chipset are breathing down its neck. Those are the Asus Zenfone 3, the Huawei nova plus, the Oppo R9s and many others.

Multi-core performance is almost on par, but in single-core tests, the HTC 10 evo has a small advantage (the S625 has only little A53 cores, so no surprise here). This advantage will shrink if we let the HTC heat up.

GeekBench 4 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    5645
  • OnePlus 3T
    4364
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    4333
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    4130
  • ZTE Axon 7
    3990
  • HTC 10
    3621
  • HTC 10 Evo
    3354
  • Oppo R9s
    3130
  • Huawei nova plus
    3100
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    2621

GeekBench 4 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    1911
  • OnePlus 3T
    1890
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    1815
  • HTC 10
    1708
  • ZTE Axon 7
    1702
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    1694
  • HTC 10 Evo
    1109
  • Oppo R9s
    845
  • Huawei nova plus
    843
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    795

Starting from a cool phone, the 10 evo offers slightly better overall performance than these phones. That's what AnTuTu thinks, anyway, we noticed occasional stutter in the UI animations when using the phone. And, again, this lead will literally melt away in minutes.

AnTuTu 6

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 3T
    165097
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    155185
  • HTC 10
    154031
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    151619
  • ZTE Axon 7
    129926
  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    129629
  • HTC 10 Evo
    82841
  • Oppo R9s
    66081
  • Huawei nova plus
    64680
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    62818
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    62217

Basemark OS 2.0

Higher is better

  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    2690
  • OnePlus 3T
    2678
  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    2670
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    2434
  • ZTE Axon 7
    2346
  • HTC 10 Evo
    1913
  • HTC 10
    1839
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    1222
  • Huawei nova plus
    1215
  • Oppo R9s
    1091
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    1031

Analyst reports have shown that gaming sessions on mobile phones typically last around 10 minutes. Even so, the HTC makes the thermometer reading go up fast and a drop in framerate was noticeable while we were running benchmarks - much choppier at the end than at the start.

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 3T
    48
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    47
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    31
  • HTC 10
    28
  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    27
  • HTC 10 Evo
    16
  • ZTE Axon 7
    12
  • Huawei nova plus
    10
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    10
  • Oppo R9s
    9.7
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    9.6

GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 3T
    20
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    19
  • ZTE Axon 7
    16
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    12
  • HTC 10
    9.9
  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    8.3
  • HTC 10 Evo
    6.9
  • Huawei nova plus
    3.7
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    3.7
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    3.4
  • Oppo R9s
    3.4

You may want to consider letting the Boost+ app limit the screen resolution. Even at QHD resolution, the Adreno 420 GPU wipes the floor with the weaker Adreno 505 found in the Snapdragon 625. At 1080p resolution, it's no contest.

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    49
  • OnePlus 3T
    49
  • HTC 10
    47
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    44
  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    38
  • HTC 10 Evo
    27
  • ZTE Axon 7
    15
  • Oppo R9s
    10
  • Huawei nova plus
    9.9
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    9.8
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    9.8

GFX 3.1 Car scene (offscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 3T
    20
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    19
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    18
  • HTC 10
    18
  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    16
  • ZTE Axon 7
    15
  • HTC 10 Evo
    12
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    3.4
  • Oppo R9s
    3.4
  • Huawei nova plus
    3.4
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    3.4

You may have noticed that we haven't mentioned the Snapdragon 820 phones yet. There are several of them that are cheaper or on par with the HTC 10 evo. And you don't have to go the obvious route of OnePlus 3T, Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus or ZTE Axon 7. You can buy older, more established brands too - the Galaxy S7 edge and the Moto Z aren't far off the price of a 10 evo.

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 3T
    36958
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    36322
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    36062
  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    32609
  • ZTE Axon 7
    32243
  • HTC 10
    28882
  • HTC 10 Evo
    28736
  • Huawei nova plus
    10524
  • Oppo R9s
    10519
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    10445
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    10401

Basemark X (medium)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 3T
    43333
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    42493
  • HTC 10 Evo
    39283
  • ZTE Axon 7
    38812
  • HTC 10
    30680
  • Huawei nova plus
    21352
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    21300
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    21164
  • Oppo R9s
    21128

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal

Higher is better

  • Galaxy S7 edge (E8890, Nougat)
    680
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    648
  • OnePlus 3T
    641
  • ZTE Axon 7
    606
  • Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
    538
  • HTC 10 Evo
    520
  • Oppo R9s
    143
  • Huawei nova plus
    138
  • Motorola Moto Z Play
    138
  • Samsung Galaxy C7
    137

We're quite disappointed at HTC over the chipset chosen for this phone. Our first contention is this - the HTC 10 evo costs too much. At this price, it should have had Snapdragon 820. Sure, Snapdragon 625 probably can't drive a QHD screen so it's out of the question. But at least it would have given the phone decent battery life.

That's the second thing - with Snapdragon 810 at its heart, the HTC 10 evo offers neither good battery life nor consistent performance. We almost think we would have preferred an S808 or a Helio-X20. That or a price tag that acknowledges the phones limitations, a Galaxy S7 edge is less than €50 more expensive and has even better waterproofing (let alone battery life).

Reader comments

  • PickyTech
  • 18 Feb 2020
  • rRU

HTC 10 EVO. HTC ditched the boomsound headset so the touting of the adaptive design is useless. The USBC port is also useless due to the fact that there is no headset adapter that can function properly with their proprietary nontechnology. Any USB-...

  • Android Bot
  • 05 Feb 2019
  • Q71

glad u like it

  • Anonymous
  • 15 Dec 2018
  • 6PR

i bought this mobail but i am facing an issue in this mobail.that its screen it's not good ..mean its screen shows diffrent colure ..like yotube icon is red but this mobail showing drak red cloure,,pls tell me how change its cloure