Sharp announces 5.5” 4K LCD with crazy 806ppi density
- D
- AnonD-131793
- Ibx
- 13 Apr 2015
AnonD-377835, 13 Apr 2015Wait soon samsung copy this too! Typical blinded haters. Google search for 4K Note 5.
- g
- grillazz
- 3IU
- 13 Apr 2015
i need 3000 ppi density to match my 3000mah battery now!!! much good battery very without lag!!!!! take my money andshruot uwp!!!123211111!!!!
- C
- Charley
- 5Jm
- 13 Apr 2015
Why? On a 5.5" device this is overkill. Don't even try to suggest otherwise. Not only that, the added pixels/resolution destroys performance on the battery and the fps front (should you care to play games on this thing).
Nice technological achievement, but really dumb in practice until we get some SoCs that can actually handle this efficiently.
- D
- AnonD-237024
- nIp
- 13 Apr 2015
720p I'm OK with, 1080p I'm great with and QHD I'm fine with. This is just pushing it now.
- D
- AnonD-377835
- 6Qv
- 13 Apr 2015
Wait soon samsung copy this too!
- A
- Ackom
- wce
- 13 Apr 2015
for me, 1080p is already very high
- h
- harlekkin
- ij{
- 13 Apr 2015
AnonD-259545, 13 Apr 2015I wish they had spent the time and money making a super pow... moreI wish they'd spend more money on exporting their phones...
- W
- W3W
- sxt
- 13 Apr 2015
Give me a break.
This people commenting like it was a Smartphone screen.
PEOPLE USE YOUR EYE IT SAID 5.5" NOT 5.5'
- m
- marclee37
- P%e
- 13 Apr 2015
prefer true black tech
denser ppi is secondary.
my tab s is 300+ ppi, my s4 is 400+ ppi. i think they are same good.
400+ might not be necessary.
i still have interrst to try a 500+ ppi true black screen
more meaningful is to bring up the ppi on nb screen, desktop screen.
would we see 130+ ppi true black nb desktop screen at affordable price in near future?
- ?
- Anonymous
- T6r
- 13 Apr 2015
Because this is what we need on a 5'' screen...4k resolution...next they will invent pants, that forever hold your fart smell...because that is just as useful, actually slightly more, I'm personally surprised they didn't think of before.
- D
- AnonD-367561
- jI9
- 13 Apr 2015
At this point, can almost guarantee it will sport pointless 4K
- D
- AnonD-259545
- Hkt
- 13 Apr 2015
I wish they had spent the time and money making a super power efficient display
- D
- AnonD-244086
- mAV
- 13 Apr 2015
good choice till 2016 because is development of solig energy
- D
- AnonD-244086
- mAV
- 13 Apr 2015
let's hope note 5 will have the same display resolution and min 4000 mah,or in the worst case a brick battery with 200 000 mAh
- s
- slr
- j2C
- 13 Apr 2015
Cenas, 13 Apr 2015Two letters: VR!Two Words = Vibration Reduction.just kidding.
- D
- AnonD-50641
- RJ2
- 13 Apr 2015
Oh no...my fully charged battery 3000mAh is draining really fast on this 4k....
- T
- To GSM Arena
- M{D
- 13 Apr 2015
Please add a link to your test:
And if you are wondering whether a 4K screen will actually make any difference, you can check out our post on pixel density. There’s a simple test there that lets you know the highest resolution that makes difference to you, depending on your eyesight.
- c
- crazytech
- Kg%
- 13 Apr 2015
So 1080 is for low end, 2k mid range and 4k high end.. this will be the trend...
- A
- Aadrian
- 0wx
- 13 Apr 2015
Wow so sharp, just crazy. Wouldn't it be overkill for the battery and brightness?
- C
- Cenas
- mVA
- 13 Apr 2015
Two letters: VR!