Nokia 3250 and SE W810 released
- N
- NiCkTHEbIG
- MFG
- 24 Mar 2006
Nokia'z much better than sonyericsson
but on thiz phone sonyericsson roxs...
much better design and cam for ericsson and ezier2handle
Anyway, the symbian 9.1 will kind of make the difference ! !
Cul8r guys and hope for nokia 2 improve ....
- v
- viperkid
- PRQ
- 24 Mar 2006
nokia 3250 is definitely the absolute winner for me! i will definitely buy 3250 bcoz it has symbian 9.1, dedicated music keys, will have more available java and symbian based games than W810 (let us face it majority of mobile games and apps are almost made for nokia specifically [dat's y SE phones has a feature that u can adjust d screen for java games/apps so u can play/run properly games/apps not really made for SE...] and again nokia is the worldwide leader in market of mobile phones, wyl SE i think only no. 4 wyl motorola doing better at no. 2 maker (with 17.8% share) i think d rankings has to do with d REAL quality of the handsets!
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/02/28/yourmoney/mobile-5806545.php
plus d fact dat 3250 has more supported audio codes like WMA and eAAC+ (which will enable u to save around 750 songs on a 1GB card unlike with W810 dat does not support WMA plus eAAC+ which will lead u to saving it in other formats like AAC which is definitely bigger in file size around 3X dat size of eAAC+) let's not forget 3250 supports standard 3.5mm earphones and playlist creation thru the phone itself plus playlist sending thru bluetooth et al! wat more can u ask for a REAL music phone! also polyphonic files on SE really sounds better coz SE supports bitrate and sampling frequency on playing .mid files and other synthetic audio formats wyl nokia does not support it resulting into a more plain sounding midi tunes, on the other hand playing d same mp3 file with d same bitrate on a SE and nokia phone like K750i and 6230 through their respective loudspeakers r really d same in quality and even dat of nokia is a bit louder! besides, SE way late in technology they only had edge recently unlike nokia having EDGE phones since 2004 if im not mistakin or even earlier (e.g. 6230) now let's see who's really behind in new technology! here's a great look of the two's technical specification, looking from there u'll really realized who is inferior (W810)!
http://developer.sonyericsson.com/site/global/products/phonegallery/w810/p_w810.jsp
http://www.forum.nokia.com/main/0,,018-2935,00.html?model=3250
- P
- Phoenix
- 2@X
- 24 Mar 2006
Nokia Roxs..... Totally agree: Nokia manufactures Rocks
For fones, you will have to buy SE.
Nokia is for Novices, the Enlightened use Ericsson (SE)
- r
- rik
- mYk
- 24 Mar 2006
sonyericsson is much better, and looks much better. its smaller and can handle double as much memory as the nokia. so there is no doubt for me. sonyericsson w810i rocks totaly. if you compare it with nokia 3250, is rocks even more.
- v
- vido_fighter
- mtZ
- 24 Mar 2006
people.. nokia has made name with 3310-3330 nokia isnt stat good animore its just crap.. S.E has made its name by making good phone's and this is (again) a good phone!
so people remember nokia isn't whot it has bin and will never ever get a phone as good as 3310-3330 they only think about money and there crapy phone's
sweet dreams everybody who whont the nokia
- L
- Ltjbuke
- nqy
- 24 Mar 2006
W810 is the winner.3250 its suX!!!
- 0
- 0014
- PBY
- 24 Mar 2006
I simply agree with Stalin.
SE is better and is more music oriented than nokia.
Why buy a phone with lesser memory capacity if you want your music in the phone?
SE Rules!
- M
- Musli
- mNL
- 24 Mar 2006
3250 is not worth its price.
w800 is still the best solution ~~
- D
- Dudu
- ntN
- 24 Mar 2006
oh come on !!!! SE W810 is 100000 times better looking , the software's great .... the features are super .... nokia ? what can I say ? ... biger ,stupider :)) ... symbian is not that great ... the camera is uncomparable with SE ... SE rulzz .... ant what's with the squigly bottom of nokia 3250 ???? it only makes it look even uglyer !!!!
- D
- Dreadnought
- niA
- 24 Mar 2006
Symbian separates toys with cool logos and names from really useful devices.
- S
- Stalin
- nsG
- 24 Mar 2006
Again with the Symbian trash?
Who needs symbian afterall?
Is this the only criteria that you always use to buy a phone?
U prefer to own a worse phone just to have symbian?
Why what advantages offers you to make the difference?
About Edge, i respect the US needs,
but the walkman will win the rest of the world...
- S
- SE sucks
- mJe
- 24 Mar 2006
Nokia Roxs.....
- ?
- Anonymous
- MJT
- 24 Mar 2006
forgot to mention 100% less memory as well
- ?
- Anonymous
- MJT
- 24 Mar 2006
3hrs talk time?? twisy bit at bottom serves what purpose?? looks very poor! camera rubbish without auto focus, rendering 2mp useless!
nokia sucks
- K
- Kleo
- my5
- 24 Mar 2006
Nokia phones are ugly, dated and crappy built and Symbian sucks! Nokia- quit while you're behind. Sony Ericsson are easily the best!
- X
- Xee
- PxK
- 24 Mar 2006
come on guys!! how can u compare a symbain os phone eith a java based phone its not fair!! symbain is way much advanced in techno then java
- s
- sew800iuser
- T4a
- 24 Mar 2006
If u dont need edge go for sonyericsson w800i. Im very satisfied with it. The camera is the best among all mobiles who got 2mpx camera. The sound is the best. U have to know that se w800i has more internal memory than w810. Just check up the specifications
- B
- Beezer
- MJT
- 24 Mar 2006
Sony Ericcson by a country mile. Nokia is on the way out!
- ?
- Anonymous
- F4p
- 24 Mar 2006
sony ericsson will be better in terms of memory and further improvement of the previous model w800i.
3250 is slightly cheaper then w810i and is definitely an improvement from 3230, nevertheless the question lies upon how well is nokia under its hood in terms of
sound clarity that SE have provided on its walkman model.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PWY
- 24 Mar 2006
dude,,nokia rox anyday