Sony Xperia X battery life
- D
- AnonD-510275
- XMF
- 18 May 2016
Please, be smart, people. Number is everything if u want to compare something that has exact teory. It has been through different way of battery test.
*If u don't wanna buy this phone, so don't comment, especialy bad comment. U only make everything worse.*
- D
- AnonD-287672
- bE8
- 18 May 2016
vrvly, 18 May 20162h more web browsing than lg g5, better than nothing. But w... moreYeah. They should have added a bigger battery and lowered the pricing
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 18 May 2016
AnonD-538833, 18 May 2016Fact - You reading compression is on the level of 5 years o... moreEven Z1 has 27 hours of talk time.
Making the X look very poor in this department.
Funny you think talk time is as important as on screen time.
Even though talk time is with the screen off the whole time.
Just goes to show you have the knowledge of a 5 year old.
- vrvly
- g5f
- 18 May 2016
2h more web browsing than lg g5, better than nothing. But worse than Z3 series, so they could try to improve though.
- D
- AnonD-287672
- bE8
- 18 May 2016
AnonD-442781, 18 May 2016So why is the overall endurance rating worse than the z5, a... moreThat is because they're testing phones on a standard 200 nits brightness which was implemented here long after the z5 was tested. Read the article first before bashing
- D
- AnonD-287672
- bE8
- 18 May 2016
Anonymous, 18 May 2016Even iPhone SE is better. With 1620mah battery.IPhone SE has a 4 inch display, not even full HD display and a processor built on a newer process. So your comparison is invalid.
- D
- AnonD-287672
- bE8
- 18 May 2016
Anonymous, 18 May 2016Consider X is powered by SD650 which is on old 28nm fab pro... moreI assume it's all due to Qnovo technology?
- D
- AnonD-287672
- bE8
- 18 May 2016
AnonD-404798, 18 May 2016awesome optimization and battery life , really impressive !Too bad it's going to be heartbreakingly expensive in my country.
- D
- AnonD-287672
- bE8
- 18 May 2016
mir, 18 May 2016This can't even match its predecessors and even the QHD S7 ... moreGiven the size of the battery, it's endurance is pretty good but it doesn't match S7 only in one aspect - video playback
- D
- AnonD-538833
- X$T
- 18 May 2016
Anonymous, 18 May 2016It not a dumb comment.
It's just facts.
Facts that yo... moreFact - You reading compression is on the level of 5 years old.
Even though they clearly stated what are their impression of the battery life of xperia x and why you shouldn't judge the battery life based on raw number you can't seem to comprehend what they are talking about. Replying to your post would be a waste of time especially considering the fact that you can't even read. Goodbye, Samsung fanboy.
- D
- AnonD-287672
- bE8
- 18 May 2016
Sony could've just put a 3000mAh battery there and got at least a 90 hour endurance rating. But no, they'll make the phone thicker but not the battery. But battery life is impressive given its size. Too bad the phone is overpriced. I wanted this phone badly.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 18 May 2016
AnonD-3367, 18 May 2016So much for the Qnovo Tech, 67H with a Mid range SoC is not... moreEven iPhone SE is better.
With 1620mah battery.
- D
- AnonD-3367
- fjR
- 18 May 2016
So much for the Qnovo Tech, 67H with a Mid range SoC is not a very good score, the old Galaxy S4 i9500 had a similar score, lol.
They should have just put 3000mAh batteries and optimized properly in the X and X Performance.
- D
- AnonD-404798
- d%{
- 18 May 2016
awesome optimization and battery life , really impressive !
- ?
- Anonymous
- J1C
- 18 May 2016
Consider X is powered by SD650 which is on old 28nm fab process, it's OK for such low capacity.
Also consider X was tested with new rules (200 nits).
While z5 had 90 nits at 50% brightness.
Many competitors presented and tested in last year did the same.
So 67H isn't bad at all (Phones with far bigger battery had been worse) , real life results may be even better and don't forget about stamina.
- D
- AnonD-442781
- pJm
- 18 May 2016
[deleted post]So why is the overall endurance rating worse than the z5, and significantly worse than the z3, and significantly worse than Samsung's flagships?
Just learn to accept it, Sony isn't the same anymore. The battery life of their phones has indeed dropped. I don't know why you would deny it, numbers done lie.
- V
- Vic
- 354
- 18 May 2016
Sony keeps making battery smaller and thickness bigger...
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 18 May 2016
[deleted post]It not a dumb comment.
It's just facts.
Facts that you can't accept.
Funny thing is i'm not even bashing the brand as i am using previous Sony Z flagships to prove how crap the current X Series is.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wry
- 18 May 2016
Anonymous, 18 May 2016Regardless of mAh, its really disappointing to see Sony's b... moreSony did add thickness to their phones.
If you look at X Performance, thicker than any Z flagship yet less mah.
But for some reason battery became smaller as their phone became thicker?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7AD
- 18 May 2016
Regardless of mAh, its really disappointing to see Sony's battery life drop to middle-of-the-road status when they used to be class-leading. I'd gladly accept an extra 1mm of thickness if it meant a return to the battery life the Xperia Z3 had.