Pixel 5 gets mediocre 120 points in DxOMark test

30 October 2020
It's using very old hardware and Google's decision not to include a third camera limits it even further.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • 3%}
  • 01 Nov 2020

No one cares about phone bench marking. It's doesn't matter to the user experience. Other than incremental upgrades in a camera all phone have been rectangles with a glass screen that check email and watch YouTube and nothing more.i don't care about synthetic bench marks. This is not a gaming pc.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • TKk
    • 01 Nov 2020

    Not an Android sheep, 31 Oct 2020Look at the poor Apple hater here, lol. Theh didn't t... moreWhat he said is true. I don't see how much better iPhone 12 camera its with the such much more expensive price point.

      • o
      • ob
      • wra
      • 01 Nov 2020

      Anonymous, 31 Oct 2020Why is GSMArena reporting DxOMark tests? If I want to read... moreWhat? Why are you mad? GSMArena just reporting from Dxomark (which is a popular testing camera site for some people) how Google Pix 5 camera performance. That's all. No promoting content of Dxomark because GSMArena has their own test too which maybe have different result.

        • d
        • diggler
        • kmn
        • 01 Nov 2020

        You guys need hobbies. Bunch of spec stroking weirdos. If you like the phone buy it, if you don't then buy something else. Jesus Christ with the whining.

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • T6v
          • 31 Oct 2020

          Why is GSMArena reporting DxOMark tests? If I want to read DxOMark tests, I will go to the site. I am here to read GSMArena tests.

          DxOMark has lost me over the past three years because the phones I have bought based on its recommendations have not been as reviewed. I don't want to accuse DxOMark of pay-to-play, but for whatever reason, their reviews of some Chinese products do not agree with my experience after I bought the recommended devices, so I have stopped relying on them.

          I trust GSMArena's reviews based on my own experience with reviewed products and do not understand why DxOMArk has to be promoted here.

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • mE0
            • 31 Oct 2020

            JDK, 30 Oct 2020Boom! DxOmark is immediately shown to be unreliable. Do ... moreNo need for hardware?
            So where will the software be installed then ?
            Lenses are hardware, so is battery , screen, motherboard, CPU , GPU, etc

            A phone without hardware isn't a phone

              YUKI93, 31 Oct 2020I actually expect Google to use a brand new 12MP camera sen... moreYep, they just stuck to the same camera module from a few years ago. And fr why they did even remove the telephoto just to make extra profits.

                Swordman, 31 Oct 2020This score is kinda expected. For those of you Google fanbo... moreI actually expect Google to use a brand new 12MP camera sensor like the one in the Samsung Galaxy S20/S20+, Sony Xperia 1 ii/5 ii, and the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max. I can understand why Google doesn't want to embrace the Quad Bayer sensor because of software computation limitations (I mean, even Sony and Apple don't use Quad Bayer sensor either and Sony is the top maker of it), but Google at the very least should use a brand new one.

                  • N
                  • Not an Android sheep
                  • 3dq
                  • 31 Oct 2020

                  Anonymous, 30 Oct 2020Still better than the iPhone 12 Look at the poor Apple hater here, lol.
                  Theh didn't test the iPhone 12 yet, but even the last year iPhone 11 Pro got 124 points.
                  Keep on trolling my guy.

                    Anonymous, 31 Oct 2020DxOMark where Huawei, Vivo and Xiaomi rank the best lolIf you have valid arguments then show where DXOMark's methodology (each of them) is faulty. Blanket statements are arguments of someone that, "maybe" I would say, a bit of reading and comprehending an established test procedures and results hurts them.

                      VectorR, 31 Oct 2020"Mediocre" 120 points? Just wondering why Pixel 3... morePoints are relative to other competitors so it's mediocre when you weigh in the latest contender from other big smartphone manufacturers.

                        • A
                        • Adul Al Salami Kebab
                        • nrX
                        • 31 Oct 2020

                        Huawei is de wei.

                          Swordman, 31 Oct 2020This score is kinda expected. For those of you Google fanbo... morePlus tbh I didn't expect the night score for Pixel 5's main camera to be so high, even above S20 ultra and Mi 10 Pro, and only bested by Mi 10 Ultra, P40 Pro, Mate 40 Pro.

                            low end hardware + good software = flagship price.

                              This score is kinda expected. For those of you Google fanboys criticising Dxomark for this score, you forgot how Google has kept the same main 12MP module for years already, while the competition is using newer camera modules. Plus Pixel 5 does not have a telephoto camera (which Google shld have kept in but they were too greedy for the profits), which means the zoom score is going to be much lower. No software tricks can make up for a real telephoto lens.

                              Let's be real, if not for Google's computational photography making up for the poor hardware, the score will have been way lower.

                                "Mediocre" 120 points? Just wondering why Pixel 3 and 4 have a way less points? I literary can't distinguish photos coming from all 3 generations. Anyway, I always agree with DxOMark Xperias reviews only :).

                                  JDK, 30 Oct 2020Boom! DxOmark is immediately shown to be unreliable. Do ... more"The software is so good that there's no more need for hardware. Kind of like iPhones."

                                  Don't be ridiculous. The camera hardware on iPhone and Pixel is clearly not up to the market standard and you know it. While Pixel 5 clicks considerably better looking photos than the previous generation, in many scenes they still look like they are coming out of a tiny sensor. iPhone 12/Pro has been a mediocre performer and looking through bunch of samples I don't find it any better than iPhone 11 series' camera (if any, the main camera & the telephoto are worse in many aspects), though 12 Pro Max might change the situation for Apple considerably.

                                    Viv, 31 Oct 2020Ppl actually buy phones based on the scores from these people?I do, based on their overall camera score, if I want to prioritise Camera is the main driver for my purchase. Though test conditions vs my actual lighting conditions in my region is way too different (actually we get more light than Northern Hemisphere, hence outdoor pictures come better than these test conditions. DxO may not be perfect but so far no one could prove their findings wrong challenged them openly as far as my knowledge goes.

                                      120 is not bad!! Better than iPhone 11 Pro, equal to OnePlus 8 Pro..... Only problem with that phone is cost, way too much just like iPhones

                                        Anonymous, 31 Oct 2020It's obvious that the Pixel 5 is not at the level of c... moreYeah, they have a new test though and the scores are higher for all phones under the new test. Still though a very good score for the Pixel 5