The jury reached a verdict in Apple vs. Samsung case
- S
- Samsung for life
- Lbm
- 27 Aug 2012
I got to say that before the jury's decision i was sure of a win for samsung and waited for the moment to brag about it infront of the apple fan boys but after that i was shocked so i think they have the right to brag about it as they won. I know samsung imitated a bit of apple products but i feel that these things are vital for each smartphone and not only samsung use them. Hopefully samsung will do better products with better quality ( without using a whole plastic body ;) I think samsung will improve after that and i dont think its a loss i think its a win for a new beginning ( apple fans will no longer call samsung a copycat)
- m
- mel
- t7X
- 27 Aug 2012
judge is also a applefanboys. thay are using ipad 4 there judgement. lol but thats the fact.
- ?
- Anonymous
- uRD
- 27 Aug 2012
If Apple don't copy, there will be no iphone, in fact it's the mother of all copy. One sided judgement, losers are consumer. Boycott Apple!!!!
- T
- TheNeighbor
- v0q
- 27 Aug 2012
Apple just unknowingly has given Samsung the motivation to outdo Apple's products. This is good. Banning Samsung's premium devices in the USA will push better products from Samsung. I just hope that $1 billion "fine" should not be passed to us consumers.
- ?
- Anonymous
- M7Y
- 27 Aug 2012
PITIFUL APPLE IS AT IT AGAIN! Obviously, they are needing funds and this is the only way they can harness it. They have the originality but they don't have the innovation and creativity. They are stuck with their design and they fear that they are already getting left behind. YES! They created the so-called all mighty Iphone but they also asked a great deal of amount for it. Expensive and easily broken (try dropping it a couple of times and say goodbye to your hard-earned money just like that). I'd still buy Samsung products because they have the variaty of designs, color, creativity, innovation that keeps things exciting, etc...
Bottomline, APPLE is no longer as competitive as before (they have become an escapist instead). Com'on, what is with a little competition to keep the fire burning, right? Sad...
- m
- mfan
- uSg
- 27 Aug 2012
No doubt, The court have been clear the result, I've seen other people comment on the case like blind eye.
who can prove the evident that Samsung is right?.
- o
- onedi
- tA$
- 27 Aug 2012
law can be manipulated to give APPLE company a monopoly
- J
- Jay
- t}B
- 27 Aug 2012
Shame On Apple...
If Patents verdicts are given jugdement like this.. it would be hard to make products for anyone..
Does apple mean if I wish to Make a television it shouldnt be rectangle, it should be round or triangle and it shouldnt black borders... coz its registered patent for some ishit company... I used to appreciate products by apple but cant really appreciate their greediness .. IT IS NOt A LOSS FOR SAMSUNG - IT IS LOSS OF US COMMON PEOPLE - THE PUBLIC WILL FACE CONSEQUECES FOR THIS VERDICT AS THE PRODUCTS WILL BE MORE EXPENSIVE AND APPLE WILL HAVE LESS COMPETITION.. THANKS TO APPLE FOR this... DOesnt make consumer happy...
- K
- K
- t7T
- 27 Aug 2012
im not surprised that apple won because they are the one who first polished the iOS and the design. compare the iphone 2g and galaxy s very similar interface and so on. at least htc has some originality in their line of android phones
- D
- DAN13L
- qPM
- 27 Aug 2012
Anonymous, 26 Aug 2012I like my S2, but was shocked when I saw how similar touchw... moreI agree, I saw touchwiz as a bootleg iOS and a disgrace to android. I was really tempted to buy the SII but touch wiz was the deal breaker
- D
- DAN13L
- qPM
- 27 Aug 2012
AnonD-59657, 27 Aug 2012I could not find there is any similarity between Sammy S2/S... moreNot only that, courts in other countries are dismissing Apple's lawsuit. Why did they win in the US?
- D
- AnonD-59657
- u7m
- 27 Aug 2012
I could not find there is any similarity between Sammy S2/S3 and Apple iPhone 4/4S in term of appearance. Similar situation goes to the Tab/Note vs iPad. Why Apple claimed Sammy copied them?
How can American jury make that kind of unfair verdict? This is a sad thing.
- i
- iSJ5
- t7X
- 27 Aug 2012
According to Mr. Webster, copy
means something that was
reproduced from the original, a
clone, an imitation, a carbon
copy. Does Samsung phones look
exactly like Apple iPhone? but we will say "inspiration" not "copy"! i will say to my self i m a one an apple's big fan, but i really dont like the there act of being greedy! i like there device but i disagree for there action!
- ?
- Anonymous
- v0q
- 27 Aug 2012
Anonymous, 26 Aug 2012Samsung's internal documents (the ones they didn't delete) ... moreThis is clear that they different because when you talk about the looks too much like with, is different when they used the word the same and there's nothing to be argue.
- ?
- Anonymous
- kg3
- 27 Aug 2012
Time to move to WP8 when it comes out. Android has too many problems.
- x
- xxx
- nxk
- 27 Aug 2012
Every mobile phone is and always will be RECTANGULAR.
- h
- harrihippi
- q2G
- 27 Aug 2012
I honestly feel that the jury was BIASED, if this case was held in korea it would have been a different story. People should have a choice to make on what phone they may want or desire. Apple seems to running knit-picking patients and only suing their closest compeitior and thats samsung. To me, samsung arrives with advanced changes in their products thats all very interesting and beautiful. As for apple, everything they've put out all looks the very same, no changes at all, just a screen full of icons which is becomes boring as all out hell. Samsung comes out with more than just a pretty face, but everything is quite useable. Again, apple has proven to be greedy and trying to dominate the market and as with a reality show, will try crushing all competition that seem to either top them or come even close to them. I own both, the iphone as well as the samsung galaxy S2 and S3 and to be truthful, I love the samsung products so much better than the iphone. After I heard about apple's petty case against samsung along with a biased jury, I sold my iphone on craigs list and want no more apple products. Apple has earned 650 billion dollars in this industry so dammit, allow someone else the opportunity and allow us americans to have a free choice of what brand phone we want. Going to the phone and seeing only apple products can become quite boring to me, in fact, apple is off the rack merchandise to me. I get more attention when I whip out a samsung product than I get when I take out the boring off the rack iphone. So samsung, you've got a consistant customer here and I love your products, keep them coming.
- D
- DaTdude
- qIj
- 27 Aug 2012
Ever think that its all a ploy?? #1 why sue the person who you get most of your hardware from #2 why sue just Sammy? Most if not all android icons are the same across the board (look and moto blur). #3 none of Sammy phones look like an iPhone nor there tabs while there is one manufacturer that makes a damn near identical copy !!! Its called good for sales on both sides. Crapple needs help in sales and Sammy will get that money back from apple in the form of paying for hardware and all you fools buy into it. Now whit that said on to the judge who helped all this. Kind of funny how much and strong evedince in Sammys favor that apple was not the first for any of this touch screen stuff. A 6 year old can search the web and find all the information needed in about an hour to call bullshit on apple. Its all bout the $$ and this show has made both a boat load of money. GOOGLE IS YOUR BEST FRIEND!!! SERCH AND STOP DRINKING THE COOLAID!!!
- i
- iOS
- mZx
- 26 Aug 2012
goodbye samdung,nice to meet you!
- s
- spark
- Li1
- 26 Aug 2012
..Next on Apple agenda:"we should sue Nokia, for their Lumia 800 looks like our former Ipod mini". What I do know is that a phone looks like a phone, a tablet looks like a tablet, a smart-phone looks like a smart-phone, regardless of the manufacturer.