DxOMark: Sony Xperia 1 II's camera comparable to a two-year-old flagship
- L
- Lucas N82
- 8j%
- 28 Jan 2021
Anonymous, 28 Jan 2021In comments on their site they said they used the default p... moreI agree. The funny fact is that Xperia 1II have full auto mode/night mode in Photo Pro. So average consumer can start app and chose "Auto" and always shot in that mode - because once you chose mode - it always will be on app start.
I have many photos from 1II on g drive and its really good camera (main sensor 24mm).
- s
- sohail shafayat
- X{X
- 28 Jan 2021
114 and 102 for photo and video without paying DxO is really good. But zoom is really bad
- W
- Wezz
- pf0
- 28 Jan 2021
The Xperia's auto mode needs to be reviewed even if it remains rather good because it offers natural rendering, otherwise the Photo Pro app explodes a lot of the best smartphones in photo but you have to like the photography
- ?
- Anonymous
- mKb
- 28 Jan 2021
In comments on their site they said they used the default photo app, because that's what the "average consumer" would use, which I think is a lame copout.
When I read reviews of cameras, I want to know what the BEST it can do is.
This is why it annoys me when reviewers leave settings on default despite switching a setting to always on or off gets you better results because normal people are drooling idiots apparently who don't do anything on their phones. I've seen reviewers not do tap to focus because it's not what the average person does. So dumb.
- K
- Kea
- 62Q
- 28 Jan 2021
Who will buy a full frame camera only using auto mode?
- ?
- Anonymous
- nFx
- 28 Jan 2021
I don't know any photographer who takes DxOMark ratings seriously, so why do phone sites quote them? Just because they are an easy source of clickbait headlines?
- A
- AlexP
- rRU
- 28 Jan 2021
PhabyoAutrey, 28 Jan 2021Do they still say such stupid things? I am surprised that t... moreAgree
- W
- Why.why.why.
- N6@
- 28 Jan 2021
I think these days, we search for review & mobile posts just to read the comment section... Cuz they're at times more believable than the post itself. (Lol)
- W
- Wingzer0
- 7X9
- 28 Jan 2021
I think this reviewers are a bunch of noobs and paid actors that are meant to downplay the real performance of Xperia 1II.They are easily paid and bribe for the sake of the competitors of Sony.
- M
- Medionx
- pGV
- 28 Jan 2021
PhabyoAutrey, 28 Jan 2021Do they still say such stupid things? I am surprised that t... moreI believe much more your opinion than dxomark scores... I bought mi note 3 because they ranked it as s7... I have both phones at home and you cant compare fotos. S7 plays in another league.
- W
- WolfRain
- 7X9
- 28 Jan 2021
I think this reviewers are paid to downplay the real performance of Xperia 1 II.
- a
- alexandre
- HBh
- 28 Jan 2021
Anonymous, 28 Jan 2021Sony need to improve in the camera and zoom capabilities. A... moreWhat phone is making 100x zoom while the Xperia is doing 3x? The Galaxy S20 Ultra with their 100x "Space Zoom" from an optical 4x zoom? I love Samsung, but their marketing is misleading and then you got this people who either are fanboys or are too naive to actually do simple research and know what they are talking about. It's even all here on GSMArena... You people shouldn't even be allowed to comment in this forums because you make a disservice to the community. Yes, 3x Zoom on a today flagship is not that special, my Mate 20 Pro has it and is from 2018, but the iPhone 12 Pro Max doesn't even reach that and people rave about their cameras. If zoom is really what you're into, you're not gonna buy an iPhone or even an Xperia, maybe not even the S20 Ultra. You either buy a DSLR really meant for it or you go for the Mi 10 Ultra, P40 Pro or especially the P40 Pro+ and the super recent S21 Ultra that can finally say they have the best zoom in the smartphone market...
- K
- Kriegsherr
- ubI
- 28 Jan 2021
Raiyan23, 28 Jan 2021dxomark.... hmm i hate them, i used to love them 2-3 years ... moreMoney talks. Pay DxOmark and high scores flow naturally. This review companies are getting bribe every now and then yet, tech forum readers pretend like they are run by St. John Paul.
- a
- atb
- pcL
- 28 Jan 2021
Forget Dxo Mark becourse there is some very interesting information on on the Xperi blog net about the new Xperia 1 iii
- a
- anonymous
- q9A
- 28 Jan 2021
PhabyoAutrey, 28 Jan 2021Do they still say such stupid things? I am surprised that t... moreThe problem is we don't know which app Dxomark is using. I am assuming they are using the normal camera app like every other phone does.
- P
- PhabyoAutrey
- 3kA
- 28 Jan 2021
Do they still say such stupid things? I am surprised that they are still considered. It makes me laugh a lot. I have the Xperia 1 Mark II since it came out and the camera is of another level. The photo quality of this phone is beyond mobile, it's not for average snapper. The more I learn how to use the manual mode of the built-in Photography Pro app, the more and more improve the photos and I notice that this phone is impressive, if you know how to use it. Dxomark is ridiculous!
- L
- LucasN82
- 8j%
- 28 Jan 2021
NUM3R1C, 28 Jan 2021I fully agree. Unfortunately, Sony is not making any progre... moreTwo apps for camera is wierd, I agree. Its super strange. But you must believe me that this phone in Photo Pro app shows really nice results.
- J
- Jongjave
- XMF
- 28 Jan 2021
Mikele, 28 Jan 2021How? The test DXOMARK carried out are all based on their to... moreDxomark caught cheating for their review. Blocking unfavorable comment etc ... Folk in forum like xdadeveloper , reddit , dpreview knows that. haha
- R
- Raiyan23
- X%1
- 28 Jan 2021
dxomark.... hmm i hate them, i used to love them 2-3 years ago but now, just no, something about them is just fishy now, it's very difficult to believe them, when they release new post it has like 2-3 comparisons but they like to give it super high scores, for example, their mate 40 pro + review had like only one comparison, that's it, they say they do 100 or 1000 different tests, okay i give them the benefit of the doubt, but they don't even give at least 3? Interesting. And now, after a few months, i go and check again and voila, magically there are like 15 comparisons, so basically they performed the tests, but their internet was so slow that it took them a few months to upload the comparison photos? Also, the Huawei, Xiaomi and the Apple phones are tested really fast but it takes them ages to do one on the Samsungs and they are a bit low rated as well, i wonder why?
- ?
- Anonymous
- Y1S
- 28 Jan 2021
Someone pointed this out over on Ars Technica; this phone should not be viewed as a consumer phone, but as a way of viewing and recording/streaming the high-res video feed from a Sony camera in real-time. In that case, this is a bargain compared to purchasing a comparable 4K display and the associated hardware. It's a case where "professional grade" literally means "If you do not make your living by producing video, this is not for you."