Exynos 2100 is a big step up from 990, still behind Snapdragon 888

02 February 2021
But the difference between the two 2021 chipsets is negligible.

Sort by:

You know what is weird? Is that Samsung makes the new Snapdragon chipset also...

    • a
    • anon1
    • 8xR
    • 02 Feb 2021

    What about signal reception and daily social media usage? I always thought people who purchase a samsung phone are not gaming people or at least, they do expect the best gaming performance. Exynos 2100 seems like the best option for those who use all aspects of a phone, not just extreme gaming or rendering.

      • D
      • AnonD-973296
      • GYi
      • 02 Feb 2021

      Qlord, 02 Feb 2021There's no surprise that Snapdragon 888 (TSMC) is fast... morei like ur funny words magic man

        • G
        • Gandalf
        • 6rE
        • 02 Feb 2021

        Qlord, 02 Feb 2021There's no surprise that Snapdragon 888 (TSMC) is fast... moreSnapdragon 888 is made by Samsung 5nm process

          There's no surprise that Snapdragon 888 (TSMC) is faster and more energy efficient than Exynos 990 os 2100 (Samsung), given:

          TSMC's 5nm transistor density is 185 MTx/mm2; and
          Samsung's 5nm transistor density is 134 MTx/mm2; in fact
          Samsung's 3nm transistor density is only 180 MTx/mm2; moreover

          TSMC's 3nm transistor density is a whopping 315 MTx/mm2

            Anonymous, 02 Feb 2021So there u go everyone it doesnt throttle and lose alot per... moreDoesn’t throttle? S21 is a throttling king currently https://youtu.be/4bZpTD3T5Vc

              Anonymous, 02 Feb 2021So there u go everyone it doesnt throttle and lose alot per... moreDon't be dishonest

              Exynos 2100 is worse than the kirin 9000

                Lstar4real, 02 Feb 2021Kirin is the best and the most advance chips... Take it or... moreYou mean Apple A14 because it's way more powerful than Kirin and still more power efficient

                  -Trix-, 02 Feb 2021” If anything, playing GenShin Impact on the Exynos and Sna... more+1
                  Samsung drops miserably to 21FPS in this comparison

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHmB10jzt70&t=745s

                    Looks like the Kirin beats both of them for performance per watt.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • 8Kf
                      • 02 Feb 2021

                      I would not be surprised if samsung demands the bias youtubers to say exynos is better this time.
                      They do not allow them to mention the plastic back nor lack of accessories.

                        Kirin is the best and the most advance chips... Take it or leave it.... Thanks

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • mur
                          • 02 Feb 2021

                          TSMC 5nm looks significantly more efficient than Samsung 5nm.

                          2.54GHz Cortex-A77 of Kirin 9000 is 17% more efficient than 2.42GHz Cortex-A78 of Snapdragon 888.

                          ARM rated A78 4% more efficient than A77 at the same clock speed and same manufacturing process. Despite higher clock speed A77 is significantly more efficient than A78.

                          Of course implementation makes a difference, but Qualcomm knows its business. Regarding that numbers TSMC looks 20-25% more efficient IMO.

                          Less efficient process also cripples the performance. No surprise Qualcomm missed ARM's 3GHz target with X1.

                            • D
                            • AnonD-973296
                            • GYi
                            • 02 Feb 2021

                            Peter UK, 02 Feb 2021Yes! That's what article is saying, and I'm soo c... moreprobs saying it cus it wont make much of a difference in the real word since most of the time spec sheets don't translate into real world use?🤔

                              AnonD-973296, 02 Feb 2021so the 2100 is 26% less battery efficient and 12% less powe... moreYes! That's what article is saying, and I'm soo confused with last sentence.

                              'Unlike last year, where some markets got a better performing chip, this year it essentially doesn't matter which version you get.'

                              I'm sorry, what? You just said it's not the same! What is going on?

                                • A
                                • Anonymous
                                • mxP
                                • 02 Feb 2021

                                The CPU is fine once again but its the GPU as always

                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9h9L0ebzmE

                                  • A
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • mxP
                                  • 02 Feb 2021

                                  notafanboy, 02 Feb 2021of course it's behind Snapdragon. Samsung always want ... moreU haters main point was the battery drain and performance throttle over long periods of gaming.

                                  This doesnt happen now and the Exynos runs cooler than the Snapdragon.

                                  And now you still complaining LOL, its the 2nd best CPU after Snapdragon. Kirin and Dimensity CPU aint on the same level

                                    • A
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • mxP
                                    • 02 Feb 2021

                                    So there u go everyone it doesnt throttle and lose alot performance over long periods of gaming. So they improved it alot, better than Kirin 9000, well done Sammy.

                                    All those haters been going on for weeks well enjoy the mud on your face. Hopefully next year Samsung will improve even further

                                      • D
                                      • AnonD-973296
                                      • GYi
                                      • 02 Feb 2021

                                      so the 2100 is 26% less battery efficient and 12% less powerful than the SD888?

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • 3Rs
                                        • 02 Feb 2021

                                        Exynos 2100 still slower than Kirin.

                                          4 of 7