128GB Samsung Galaxy S23 to use slower UFS 3.1 storage
- S
- Samsung user
- wri
- 31 Jan 2023
joe nodden, 31 Jan 2023😂 Keep telling yourself that while you spend thousands on S... moreOf course. Why not? It's a logical thing to spend money buying high quality phone with long term software support.
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 31 Jan 2023
Samsung user, 31 Jan 2023The launch price of S23 base model in the USA would probabl... moreSource: Trust me.
Christ on a bicycle, make some objective claims or don't bother replying.
- ?
- Anonymous
- a0V
- 31 Jan 2023
The Galaxy S line used to be the best of the best but in different form factors. Ever since the S21, the "base" models have been getting downgraded. Just buy an iPhone.
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 31 Jan 2023
[deleted post]😂 Keep telling yourself that while you spend thousands on Samsung's underwhelming phones, buddy.
- ?
- Anonymous
- q8Q
- 31 Jan 2023
Samsung user, 31 Jan 2023The launch price of S23 base model in the USA would probabl... moreEven if that was true its still not justified and should be cheaper.
Or have better upgrades.
They are likely to even copy Apple by using last gen soc soon.
- p
- potato4k
- XUy
- 31 Jan 2023
Demon Slayer, 30 Jan 2023That's irrevant because i saved everything on the card... moreIf you are content with the transfer speed of SD card, then whether the base S23 uses UFS3 or UFS4 is irrelevant as even UFS2 speed is faster than SD card. UFS3 is sufficient for modern smartphone usage. USF4 on higher storage tiers makes sense for people who wants to transfer large files.
- S
- Samsung user
- wri
- 31 Jan 2023
joe nodden, 31 Jan 2023If gsmarena is correct, the S23 will launch with an MSRP of... moreThe launch price of S23 base model in the USA would probably 950 USD.
950 USD S23 vs 1100 USD S20 (after inflation).
Thats 150 USD price difference.
So its understandable if S20 had higher resolution than S23.
Typical stupid trolls.
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 31 Jan 2023
Samsung user, 31 Jan 2023You must be forgetting the fact that the S20 base model had... moreIf gsmarena is correct, the S23 will launch with an MSRP of 960 euros. Which is $1041 USD.
Don't give me that inflation nonsense. You mean to tell me that the company who literally manufactures its own displays has made absolutely zero efficiency gains in manufacturing over the past 3 god damn years?
Meanwhile other companies using Samsung's own displays have managed to put better displays in newer models equally priced in comparison to their older ones?
Typical Samsung fanboy.
- S
- Samsung user
- wri
- 31 Jan 2023
joe nodden, 31 Jan 2023Charging a thousand dollars for a phone and cheaping out on... moreYou must be forgetting the fact that the S20 base model had a launching price of 1000 USD, in 2020. Thats like 1100 USD in 2023 after inflation.
Of course S20 had better resolution compared to S23.
- ?
- Anonymous
- gqb
- 31 Jan 2023
Demon Slayer, 30 Jan 2023The Xperia 5 iv is as long as the S22 plus I'd hardly... moreThat's because the Xperia 5 iv has a taller 21:9 screen while the Galaxy S22 has a shorter 19.5:9. It won't be much difference if the S22 screen is in 21:9.
- ?
- Anonymous
- gqb
- 31 Jan 2023
potato4k, 30 Jan 2023SD cards are a lot slower than even UFS2. You don't install apps or even the OS on a microSD card.
- ?
- Anonymous
- gqb
- 31 Jan 2023
Anonymous , 31 Jan 2023855 had overheating issue. One of recent Qualcomm soc came ... moreAnything below 888 doesn't suffer from overheating.
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 31 Jan 2023
Anonymous , 31 Jan 2023From my past experience. Samsung mid range soc are way bett... moreYeah they're better but comparing trash to trash still means it's all trash. Look at the A53. Its performance is only similar to phones with a slow as hell 4 Gen 1.
- S
- Samath N8 808 owner
- GR{
- 31 Jan 2023
Anonymous , 31 Jan 2023855 had overheating issue. One of recent Qualcomm soc came ... moreI beg to differ sir. No overheating on my SD855 enabled LG G8x. For a past flagship, its amazingly cool.
- S
- Samath N8 808 owner
- GR{
- 31 Jan 2023
Considering that we don't have microSD slots now, a 128GB version of a flagship is just a thing of past itself.
Forget speeds, the capacity itself is of past.
Don't they realise that 128 GB internal is something from 2016?? Its 7 years now. Then why don't they give microSD from the past?
- A
- Anonymous
- XSs
- 31 Jan 2023
joe nodden, 31 Jan 2023Idk if the 855 was really that bad. I mean if I were you I ... more855 had overheating issue. One of recent Qualcomm soc came with shortcomings after two amazing efficient soc like 845 and 835 (one if the first arm soc used in several notebooks).
Yeah 810 wasn't good either, but it was that mainstream like 801. Only few models had the soc including s5 us edition, Xperia z5.
- A
- Anonymous
- XSs
- 31 Jan 2023
joe nodden, 31 Jan 2023Except their mid range SoCs suck as well. From my past experience. Samsung mid range soc are way better than their flagship soc of recent years.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7X4
- 31 Jan 2023
joe nodden, 31 Jan 2023Idk if the 855 was really that bad. I mean if I were you I ... moreBut TSMC learned and improved over the years.... Scamsung is opposite on the otherhand, they just get worse & worse with their Qualcomm/Crappynos fabbed socs.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LkB
- 31 Jan 2023
AnonD-731363, 30 Jan 2023Rather usb 2.0 and 200+W charging than opposite so USB 4.0 ... moreBetter having 15W and healthy battery for 3 years than 200W and bad battery after 10 months.
Explain us why testing at 10W how many cycles it can last if phone is gonna be charged at 200W?
Is there something to hide from costumers?
Why not testing at 200W?
- joe nodden
- j5{
- 31 Jan 2023
Anonymous, 31 Jan 2023Nothing to prove. 888 was the hell of inefficient soc follo... moreIdk if the 855 was really that bad. I mean if I were you I would've mentioned the 810. That was horrendous and maybe the only time TSMC has been behind.