Motorola Edge 50 Pro review
- ?
- Anonymous
- AVw
- 16 Apr 2024
Anonymous, 16 Apr 2024Overpriced phone
Small battery.
No SD card
No audio jack.
Instead of telling us common knowledge, get a Sony.
Or a cheap phone that has it all, because plenty of those that tick all the boxes.
- F
- Fa14bi
- JHY
- 16 Apr 2024
Anonymous, 16 Apr 2024Pretty clear some markets get 3.1. Impossible to make 2.2... moreas they said in the review here, they take UFS 2.2 as a false claim and say that it is 3.1 as it reaches that amount of speed.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LHk
- 16 Apr 2024
Overpriced phone
Small battery.
No SD card
No audio jack.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 16 Apr 2024
IpsDisplay, 16 Apr 2024The v30 is way more efficient seems like Vivo knows what th... more120 vs 144Hz ..
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 16 Apr 2024
Anders, 16 Apr 2024The fact that it's only using UFS 2.2 should be in the... morePretty clear some markets get 3.1.
Impossible to make 2.2 to reach 1,5-1,6 Gb/s.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 16 Apr 2024
If you feel shocked by its price, remember there is huawei nova 12s, phone of €500 that does not have 5G, uses SD778 ( same of moto edge 20 from 2021) , has 8MP super wide, no IP rating, older BT5.2, usb 2.0,
- N
- Nerd
- vGN
- 16 Apr 2024
It's priced competitively in india. Rest everywhere no one would ever buy this
- A
- Anders
- 39y
- 16 Apr 2024
The fact that it's only using UFS 2.2 should be in the cons list too.
This phone is way, way too overpriced. Motorola must've lost their minds or they actually don't want to make any money from this phone.
- I
- IpsDisplay
- q98
- 16 Apr 2024
The v30 is way more efficient seems like Vivo knows what they are doing with optimization of the 7 gen 3
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 16 Apr 2024
Initial price here is far lower than what edge 40 arrived.
Almost 25% less.
- M
- Minu
- ter
- 16 Apr 2024
Mills, 16 Apr 2024There's no bad phone. Just a bad priced one. This is a... moreThe fact that the Vivo V30 Pro basically kills this one, and the poor naming scheme fuels the fire even further
- P
- Pralea
- mQ0
- 16 Apr 2024
Okay, maybe a bit pricey, but come on gsmarena. 4 stars? If you would judge every phone for its price you would have to lower the score for a lot of phones
- A
- AC-DC
- U@W
- 16 Apr 2024
Mills, 16 Apr 2024There's no bad phone. Just a bad priced one. This is a... moreYou're right about everything except a minor mistake. It is indeed LTPO, just not LTPS.
It is priced at a very competitive range in India, one could even tell this is almost the best all rounder in its price segment.
Don't know why Moto messed this up for other countries.
- L
- Later2020
- XS{
- 16 Apr 2024
Just put in some extra money and buy the OnePlus 12R , rather than this one.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Fek
- 16 Apr 2024
At €700, getting beat up by Exynos S23 FE and Pixel 8 makes it look sad.
Not even starting about base S23 and OnePlus being cheaper and even more better.
Even edge 40 pro which goes for 619 euro now crushes it too.
Ouch motorola
- k
- kraken9
- 2S{
- 16 Apr 2024
As Indian buyer I have to pay ₹28k with bank offers for 8gb+256gb model. Top model seems overpriced at ₹34k . Specs Seem fine to me. Good camera for photos. Good enough chip for day to day work. Battery capacity should have been alil better compared to rest of the phones in this price range. (And the software updates history of motorola isn't praiseworthy) I'll order one :)
Also don't like sale strategy here. They have weekly sale where stock is exhausted within 3 to 5 minutes. Plus their selling partner , Flipkart charges extra ₹90 or so as arbitrary packaging fee . The delivery guy opens the packaging to ensure safe delivery without damage but it ruins fun of unboxing yourself.
- ?
- Anonymous
- CbD
- 16 Apr 2024
The phone looks cool but the 120 watt charging would have me overthinking if the phone would explode any minute
- a
- ashrobb
- 8B4
- 16 Apr 2024
Not a bad phone, but terribly priced. Battey life seems low, but for a 144hz display and 4500mah battery it has decent numbers.
- M
- Mills
- xFM
- 16 Apr 2024
There's no bad phone. Just a bad priced one. This is a prime example. Midrange performance in a flagship price tag.
7 Gen 3 should've been 8 Gen 2 or 8s Gen 3. Don't know why they gave the Ultra 8s.
No LTPO is fine, I guess. It saves battery. Speaking of which, the battery is average.
700 euro price tag should be at least 560 euros.
Ultra should've gotten 8 Gen 3 or Dimensity 9300 or 9200+