Samsung Galaxy Note 4 review: Four of a kind
Four of a kind
Snapdragon 805 chip
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 we reviewed comes with the Snapdragon 805 system-on-a-chip, which should be the last 32-bit high-end chipset from Qualcomm. It's built using a 28nm manufacturing process and has a quad-core CPU with four Krait 450 cores clocked as high as 2.7GHz. The graphics processor is an Adreno 420 GPU.
The Galaxy Note 4 can alternatively come with the Samsung-made Exynos 5433 with an octa-core processor with four Cortex-A53 1.3GHz cores and four Cortex-A57 1.9GHz ones. The GPU in charge in the Exynos chipset is the Mali-T760. Our review unit however is the Snapdragon version.
Let's look at the CPU performance first. Geekbench 3 and AnTuTu 5 give an all-around evaluation of the system. Here the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 scored very high results. In Geekbench 3 it was defeated (strangely) by its peers - Samsung Galaxy S5 and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 with Snapdragon chipsets and the Exynos-powered Alpha. It edged out the Apple iPhone 6 Plus, though.
AnTuTu 5 shows the Galaxy Note 4 as the second seed just behind the Galaxy Alpha. Basemark OS II shows an overall score along with single and multi-core scores.
GeekBench 3
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
3214 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
3011 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
2937 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
2925 -
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
2884 -
Sony Xperia Z3
2860 -
OnePlus One
2663 -
LG G3 - EU version
2563 -
HTC One (M8)
2367
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
51905 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
46824 -
HTC One (M8)
44020 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
43164 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
42211 -
Sony Xperia Z3
40393 -
LG G3 - EU version
39905
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
1222 -
OnePlus One
1196 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
1181 -
LG G3 - EU version
1126 -
HTC One (M8)
1126 -
Sony Xperia Z3
1109 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
1082 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
1003 -
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
915
Basemark OS II (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
2588 -
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
2579 -
HTC One (M8)
2428 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
2415 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
2236 -
LG G3 - EU version
2213 -
OnePlus One
2213 -
Sony Xperia Z3
2114
Basemark OS II (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
15096 -
OnePlus One
10234 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
10063 -
HTC One (M8)
9860 -
LG G3 - EU version
9611 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
9446 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
9364 -
Sony Xperia Z3
8792
The Adreno 420 GPU inside the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is very capable. We ran a series of on and offscreen tests through GFXBench and the gaming benchmark Basemark X. It's important to note that the onscreen tests should turn out with a lower framerate because of the Galaxy Note 4's (quite higher than 1080p) 1440p screen resolution.
The GFX 2.7 and 3.0 offscreen tests place the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 in second place behind the Apple iPhone 6 Plus. The difference in framerate isn't big compared to the iPhone but is considerable (in favor of the Galaxy Note 4) when compared to other phones.
The onscreen tests place the Samsung phablet way behind the competition, which is to be expected - it has the highest resolution here, aside from the LG G3.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 got points where it counted, though. Gaming shows great promise as the Note 4 topped Basemark X.
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
44.6 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
41.7 -
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
31.3 -
HTC One (M8)
28.4 -
OnePlus One
28.3 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
27.8 -
Sony Xperia Z3
27.7 -
LG G3 - EU version
27.2 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
26.3
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
48.4 -
HTC One (M8)
30.1 -
OnePlus One
30 -
Sony Xperia Z3
29.3 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
28.1 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
26.7 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
26.4 -
LG G3 - EU version
20.5
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
18.6 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
18.5 -
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
13.4 -
OnePlus One
12.1 -
Sony Xperia Z3
12 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
11.8 -
LG G3 - EU version
11.4 -
HTC One (M8)
11.1 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
9.9
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
25.3 -
OnePlus One
12.9 -
Sony Xperia Z3
12.7 -
HTC One (M8)
11.9 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
11.7 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
11.2 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 S800
10 -
LG G3 - EU version
7.2
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
18684 -
OnePlus One
13129 -
Sony Xperia Z3
12637 -
HTC One (M8)
12396 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
11744 -
LG G3 - EU version
11552 -
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
11065
Browsing benchmarks show JavaScript and HTML 5 performance on the Samsung Galaxy Note 4. Kraken tests the former and lists the Galaxy Note 4 as second only to the iPhone 6 Plus and the Galaxy Alpha - a respectable score. HTML 5 performance on the Galaxy Note 4 is surpassed only by its main rival, the Apple iPhone 6 Plus.
Kraken 1.1
Lower is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
4650 -
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
4911 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
5351 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
6043 -
Sony Xperia Z3
6355 -
LG G3 - EU version
6987 -
OnePlus One
7008 -
HTC One (M8)
10296
BrowserMark 2.1
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6 Plus
3389 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
2208 -
Sony Xperia Z3
1533 -
LG G3 - EU version
1474 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
1398 -
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
1364 -
OnePlus One
1339 -
HTC One (M8)
1069
What you need to take away from these tables is that the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is a very capable smartphone. The 1440p display resolution is tasking on the GPU (as seen in the scores above) and the multitasking features will take their tow on the processor but the Snapdragon 805 handles everything with ease.
Performance is buttery smooth aside from a half a second wait when you tap the recent apps button (but probably just nitpicking here - the same task on the Nexus 5 running stock Android takes exactly the same rime). The UI appears to run at a constant 60fps.
Reader comments
- fanta
- 16 Oct 2023
- gu@
battery is just a waste of time
- Honorathe Bizumuremy
- 09 Aug 2023
- NXT
It has torch?