Samsung U800 Soul b
- ?
- Anonymous
- pt}
- 04 Jun 2008
cool
- b
- ben
- wr6
- 03 Jun 2008
freeware catalogue for PC http://www.greenbydiamond.com/index_files/freeware.html
- a
- a friend
- 47X
- 03 Jun 2008
video, bad resolution QCIF what are they thinking
- ?
- Anonymous
- kWZ
- 03 Jun 2008
hey its like SE w890 with less stuff!
- ?
- Anonymous
- mDL
- 02 Jun 2008
WAaouuuu ! QCIF video recording at 15fps ! Welcome back ten years ago...
I love Samsung, but for your information Nokia will release mid june the 6220C for 325 euros with VGA video recording at 30fps...
- s
- shadowed_angst
- 2At
- 02 Jun 2008
I hope the production units will have video recording at QVGA or CIF resolution at the least because QCIF is already outdated for mid-range phones.
- D
- Duan
- wuc
- 02 Jun 2008
Lol @ your comparisons. Com'on men !!! U r comparing this sexy outstanding phone with awful Nokia 6300. No comparison. Hey emotional ppl...dont go for name....just be impartial & compare the looks, features, memory features, camera etc.
If u compare the body, the we can say it competes with Nokia 6500 classic and Sony Ericsson T650. If talk about camera, then its rivals are S.E C702, G700, Nokia N78 and LG KF510.
Get life...dont get emotional to defend that brand which you carry. I m uzing S.E K800...but I m impressed with this phone az well. I ll definitely will try this sexy babe.
- ?
- Anonymous
- MsN
- 01 Jun 2008
good phone
- J
- J
- F4p
- 01 Jun 2008
Personally, i find the touch interface a little insensitive at times. No doubt a good camera. However its flash is not powerful enough when facing strong sunlight or in dim light conditions at night. One factor they should improve on would be the volume of the loudspeaker. It is too soft to be heard on a busy street or bus. Sound quality through the earphones are excellent. Sound quality through the loudspeakers lack bass. keypad is great for messaging. large screen makes viewing of photos a pleasure. conclusion: great for photos but not a good option for people whom like to blast music through the loudspeakers and not suitable for people whom often visit crowded and noisy areas.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pkh
- 31 May 2008
this is a direct rival to the 6500classic...
- ?
- Anonymous
- Mtq
- 31 May 2008
Bad video (QCIF 15 fps)...
- n
- neeha
- PxK
- 31 May 2008
Anonymous, 31 May 2008What is it nice about this phone? You just wake up and neve... morewell i thnk u r wrong.it realy looks nice.nokia 6300 is good bt nt more dn it
- ?
- Anonymous
- mD6
- 31 May 2008
of course this phone looks muc better than old stylish nokia 6500
- T
- TC16
- kH@
- 31 May 2008
well not bad
but the 6500 lo0ks alot beter
and the u800 dusnt have the wow facter of the u900 but still ok
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2x5
- 31 May 2008
What is it nice about this phone? You just wake up and never seen cell phoen in your life then I can seee why you say this beautiful phone. This is another cheap basic phone from Samsung like others make. You want a basic beautiful phoen look Nokia 6300 if you need more advance and not expensive then look at E51 and next month to E66.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PHq
- 30 May 2008
usb2.0 ok, but A2DP??
- ?
- Anonymous
- Uq4
- 30 May 2008
The best phone till now! much much better copier than original Nokia 6...
- ?
- Anonymous
- q{X
- 30 May 2008
it is copy of Nokia 6500 classic. 1 Gb memory, Design, metal finish, almost same size and weight.
Big companies like Samsung and nokia they should have some standards abt copying each others product. Cell phones are all about innovation and new technology. But copying each other is really lame specially by big companies. Inspiration is healthy but in this field and the way the market is they should come up with new ideas.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PZt
- 30 May 2008
samsung design some of the most beautifull phones in the market today and this one is certainly one of them. but based on my experience, nokia and sony ericson rules when it comes to features.
- ?
- Anonymous
- ibq
- 30 May 2008
Opss...No autofocus...