Google Pixel 6a
- R
- RandyRiffin
- CpL
- 23 Nov 2021
Still 60Hz? Come on Google. I really wanted that smoooth display! I really hope you can adopt it next year as almost every other miranger will have it
[Don't want to get derogatory otherwise ElioX will come and GET me]
- R
- Ron7x
- xPP
- 22 Nov 2021
Could be my next phone after nova 7i.☺️
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0x6
- 22 Nov 2021
In my country 4a 5g was around 700 euros i live in europe
- E
- ElioX
- HLw
- 22 Nov 2021
matezaco, 22 Nov 2021400€ také my money and give me phoneNo way. At least 499 or 549. No less than that
- d
- dbjungle
- jMG
- 22 Nov 2021
Anonymous, 22 Nov 2021plz remove that ridiculous back camera design @ least on... moreI'm not a fan either. My fav is the one from the Pixel 4 through 5a series. Just a clean black square. I'd also prefer the hole punch in the top left. I know it's more symmetrical in the center, but it's more distracting as well.
- d
- dbjungle
- jMG
- 22 Nov 2021
I would be happy with a 778 or Tensor, but I hope this uses the Tensor. Using a 778 instead of Tensor kind of comes across as Tensor is nothing special to Google and they just wanted to create a buzz by saying they have their own chip. It means nothing without any real commitment behind it. Putting it in the 6a and all future Pixels will give it more legitimacy that Google is all in with it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- smx
- 22 Nov 2021
To big for me, shame, good specs
- ?
- Anonymous
- ELq
- 22 Nov 2021
Anonymous, 22 Nov 2021153mm now become compact size !!!! just google these w... morePixel 6A is 71.8 wide, Note 4 is 78.6 That's the part of the phone that you hold
- N
- Niko Sable
- 3S6
- 22 Nov 2021
Amazing phone, i want it. Good size for me like an other "compact" phones.
- G
- GD
- QwS
- 22 Nov 2021
Anonymous, 22 Nov 2021plz remove that ridiculous back camera design @ least on... moreFirst of all, the back camera bump may seem ridiculous to you but others may be digging it. It is a welcome change from the same styled camera bump you find in almost all other smartphones.
- m
- mattwelke
- 017
- 22 Nov 2021
Anonymous, 22 Nov 2021153mm now become compact size !!!! just google these w... moreThis drives me crazy. I can't stand not being able to use my phone with one hand. I remember using the Nexus 5 and it feeling like the perfect size. I don't understand why phones these days are the size of small tablets.
- ?
- Anonymous
- M4v
- 22 Nov 2021
plz remove that ridiculous back camera design
@ least on this model
make the back design... ordinary just like 3A model
current camera design of pixel 6 series reminds me Huawei nova...place of it just was upper + single cam
https://m.gsmarena.com/huawei_nova-pictures-8284.php
- ?
- Anonymous
- M4v
- 22 Nov 2021
153mm now become compact size !!!!
just google these words
Best phablets of 2014
Galaxy Note 4
with 153mm was 1 of them
https://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note_4-6434.php
now 153mm in 2022 becomes compact😂
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8kP
- 22 Nov 2021
No SD card, audio jack, terrible big failed. No BUY more garbage thanks.
- D
- AnonD-1027450
- Mxm
- 22 Nov 2021
PixelFan, 22 Nov 2021Removing the headphone jack doesn't necessarily automa... moreOEMs are removing headphone jack only thing you can do is crying 😭😭😭😭
- H
- Hiiii
- XWp
- 22 Nov 2021
I hope it'll have the best camera at it's price
- P
- PixelFan
- w4Y
- 22 Nov 2021
ElioX, 22 Nov 2021They could have left that part empty, but they already wrot... moreRemoving the headphone jack doesn't necessarily automatically equate to better battery life.
Before anyone bother pointing out that more space = bigger battery. I'd like to specify that if the OEM chooses to optimize the OS, that also can help achieve excellent battery. Plus, optimizing the OS also helps deliver a better user experience. Google obviously delivers (atleast imo) the best android experience out there but 6 could use some optimization and it seems like the upcoming patches are meant to deliver just that.
Anyways, regarding the 3.5mm jack - OEMs simply choose to abandon the jack because it helps with the sales of TWS buds or those horrendous Type-C to 3.5mm connectors. Improved battery, better waterproofing have got nothing to do with it. That's their marketing teams doing their best to brainwash you with arguments with some semblance of reasoning. The only valid reason to drop it might be reduced manufacturing costs but I'd like to see any OEM admit it.
Also, the A52s, A72 and the older pixels a phones actually are pretty good with battery. These phones also have the headphone jack.
I'd also add Sony phones to the list but their absolutely ridiculous pricing kinda makes it hard for anyone to use them as an example in a remotely reasonable argument.
TWS vs 3.5mm is an argument that has been done many times. So nothing new needs to be said, both have their various use cases, merits and demerits. So if the removal of 3.5mm jack from a phone series that had housed it for the past couple of years is listed as a demerit then it is a valid one.
Also, thank you for pointing out that they had flagged the specs. I totally missed that somehow.