Latest Geekbench results show the Exynos 2400 is closing the gap to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- ?
- Anonymous
- t7@
- 05 Jan 2024
Anonymous, 05 Jan 2024Exynos is Samsung's baby and they will never let TSMC ... moreAlso because its cheaper to make their own soc with their own fab while charging the same as tsmc fabbed soc.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0Un
- 05 Jan 2024
It's not for the CPU... in my case I'm not willing to spend my money in a simplified modem.
The snapdragon uses the Qualcomm X75 modem while the Exynos comes with a subpar implementation with less combinations of bands aggregated, this time including even in upstream, and worse performance.
- Tranquillow
- AdF
- 05 Jan 2024
Meanwhile the midrange line still get beaten out by the Snapdragon 778G for the 3rd time
- a
- abc.to.xyz
- KIs
- 05 Jan 2024
Again, few percent less benchmarks mean little. Exynos main problems are (A) sustained performance. (B) Random SoCs heating up with basic usage degrading the overall experience much closer to unstable. Their benchmarks are mostly fine with around 10% of degraded performance.
- ?
- Anonymous
- tZ4
- 05 Jan 2024
alcatraz, 05 Jan 2024If Exynos continues to be made by Samsung (foundry) it can ... moreExynos is Samsung's baby and they will never let TSMC manufacture Exynos chipsets. Samsung Foundry also need Exynos chipsets to fill production slots because let's face it, most OEMs would choose TSMC if they have a choice. Qualcomm learned the mistake of choosing SF for making 888 and 8gen1 and now realise only TSMC can deliver the yield and quality.
- H
- Hemedans
- fuZ
- 05 Jan 2024
alcatraz, 05 Jan 2024If Exynos continues to be made by Samsung (foundry) it can ... moreExynos use same cores as sd 8 gen 3, the reason it score lower because it has lower clocks, what you said doesn't apply here,
- ?
- Anonymous
- 61v
- 05 Jan 2024
and when the phone overheat, the performance will be the same like last year chipset.
happen both in galaxy and iphone
- B
- B52
- gLC
- 05 Jan 2024
I do not give a heck about those numbers...
But usual differences like heat management, consumption management (battery life) and especially image processing really make a huge difference.
- T
- TechFa
- Nu7
- 05 Jan 2024
Let me get this correctly; Is Samsung's Exynos now Qualcomm's direct competitor for a second place? 🤔
- Leanzazzy
- IWU
- 05 Jan 2024
Let's see the sustained performance. Peak numbers mean nothing if sustained performance is terrible.
- ?
- Anonymous
- fCE
- 05 Jan 2024
Nobody talk about overheating issue created by Exynos.
Benchmark does not mean day to day usage means a lot.
If that overheats it fails.
- j
- jiyen235
- XQQ
- 05 Jan 2024
[deleted post]I had nothing to compare to the S8 lol, I'm not saying anything about battery but heat, when gaming it got pretty hot, otherwise I was happy with it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Hk%
- 05 Jan 2024
Can't imagine the heat of those phones.
- A
- Alikh
- av@
- 05 Jan 2024
The main problem is with their fabrication process!
- P
- Poldo
- 45$
- 05 Jan 2024
Samsung in a nutshell a semi-conductor company cant even decide which third party chip they are putting to their boring phones.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7t3
- 05 Jan 2024
you have to suffer, 05 Jan 2024yeah sure pretty decent processor that requires you to char... moreExynos 2100 and Tensor G1 owner here – it's not that bad. They get a bit hot from time to time and they sometimes need a charge a bit before I head to bed but they're not too bad honestly.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7t3
- 05 Jan 2024
NoName, 05 Jan 2024But no Aptx Lossless support anyway.LDAC is better than AptX.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7t3
- 05 Jan 2024
Anonymous, 05 Jan 2024SD8 gen 3 also has very poor efficiency.In actuality it is rather efficient. It's about as efficient as the 8 Gen 2 iirc, and that is a very efficient chip
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0BG
- 05 Jan 2024
Anonymous, 04 Jan 2024Even if it is 1nm, as long it is made in a Samsung fab it i... moreSD8 gen 3 also has very poor efficiency.
- ?
- Anonymous
- u{E
- 05 Jan 2024
DroidBoye, 05 Jan 20248 gen 3 still managed to be on top even though it has 2 cor... morethose 2 cores the sd lacked were A520 cores which arent that powerful anyway, combined with the snapdragons much higher clock speeds in the performance cores... yeah, isnt all that surprising